Quality of Pancreatic Cyst Clinical Practice Guidelines.

IF 2.8 4区医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY

Journal of clinical gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1097/MCG.0000000000001939

Jason J John, Wojciech Blonski, Tea Reljic, Ambuj Kumar

{"title":"Quality of Pancreatic Cyst Clinical Practice Guidelines.","authors":"Jason J John, Wojciech Blonski, Tea Reljic, Ambuj Kumar","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000001939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There are various published clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the management of pancreatic cystic lesions. However, the quality of these guidelines has not been systematically appraised. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of CPGs published in the last 5 years for the management of pancreatic cysts.Methods: A systematic search of the PubMed database for eligible CPGs published between January 1, 2016 and November 17, 2021, using a sensitive filter. The quality of the CPGs was independently evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II instrument, with domain scores considered sufficient quality if >60% and good quality if >80%.Results: The search yielded 4 eligible CPGs out of 426 citations. The scores varied for different domains for each CPG, with the overall median score being 79% for scope and purpose, 26% for stakeholder involvement, 51% for rigor of development, 69% for clarity of presentation, 14% for applicability, and 75% for editorial independence.Conclusions: The study revealed that the quality of the CPGs for pancreatic cyst management in adults remains moderate at best. Patient representatives were not involved in any of the CPG development process. There is a significant scope for improvement in methodological rigor and clarity of presentation.","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"836-839"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000001939","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are various published clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the management of pancreatic cystic lesions. However, the quality of these guidelines has not been systematically appraised. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of CPGs published in the last 5 years for the management of pancreatic cysts.

Methods: A systematic search of the PubMed database for eligible CPGs published between January 1, 2016 and November 17, 2021, using a sensitive filter. The quality of the CPGs was independently evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II instrument, with domain scores considered sufficient quality if >60% and good quality if >80%.

Results: The search yielded 4 eligible CPGs out of 426 citations. The scores varied for different domains for each CPG, with the overall median score being 79% for scope and purpose, 26% for stakeholder involvement, 51% for rigor of development, 69% for clarity of presentation, 14% for applicability, and 75% for editorial independence.

Conclusions: The study revealed that the quality of the CPGs for pancreatic cyst management in adults remains moderate at best. Patient representatives were not involved in any of the CPG development process. There is a significant scope for improvement in methodological rigor and clarity of presentation.

查看原文本刊更多论文

胰腺囊肿质量临床实践指南。

背景:有各种出版的临床实践指南(CPGs)胰腺囊性病变的管理。然而，这些指南的质量还没有得到系统的评价。本研究旨在评价近5年来发表的用于胰腺囊肿治疗的CPGs的质量。方法:系统检索PubMed数据库中2016年1月1日至2021年11月17日期间发表的符合条件的cpg，使用敏感过滤器。CPGs的质量使用研究与评估指南II工具进行独立评估，如果>评分为60%，则认为质量足够，如果>评分为80%，则认为质量良好。结果:从426篇引文中检索出4篇符合条件的cpg。每个CPG在不同领域的得分各不相同，总体中位数得分为范围和目的79%，利益相关者参与26%，开发严谨性51%，表达清晰度69%，适用性14%，编辑独立性75%。结论:研究表明，CPGs在成人胰腺囊肿治疗中的质量充其量是中等的。患者代表未参与任何CPG开发过程。在方法的严谨性和表述的清晰性方面还有很大的改进余地。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of clinical gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学

CiteScore

5.60

自引率

3.40%

发文量

339

审稿时长

3-8 weeks

期刊介绍： Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.