The effect of feed force on vibration and productivity in hammer drilling: A machine-independent analysis excluding the effect of motor speed reduction

IF 2.5 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Sebastian Zimprich, Frieder Matter, Johannes Reiser, Jan Heinrich Robens, Sven Matthiesen
{"title":"The effect of feed force on vibration and productivity in hammer drilling: A machine-independent analysis excluding the effect of motor speed reduction","authors":"Sebastian Zimprich,&nbsp;Frieder Matter,&nbsp;Johannes Reiser,&nbsp;Jan Heinrich Robens,&nbsp;Sven Matthiesen","doi":"10.1016/j.ergon.2023.103524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Construction workers usually use hammer drills to drill holes into hard materials for anchors or concrete screw installations. Vibration emission in the drilling process can cause various occupational diseases. Workers influence this process mainly by varying the feed force. A feed force variation in hammer drilling causes a machine-specific motor speed reduction. As it is impossible to distinguish the effect of feed force on vibration and productivity from machine-specific motor speed reduction effects, the findings of various studies on hammer drilling vary considerably. The goal of this study therefore is to identify the feed force effect on vibration and productivity, thus excluding machine-specific effects due to a motor speed reduction. We modified a hammer drill to keep motor speeds constant over a wide feed force range and conducted a drilling study using an automated drilling test rig. The drilling productivity increased with higher feed force, whereas machine-specific motor speed reduction led to a decrease. Evaluated with Cohen's f, both factors had a large effect (feed force: f = 0.62, motor speed: f = 0.42). An increasing feed force led to a higher vibration emission with a large effect (f = 1.03). Motor speed reduction reduced vibration with a small effect (f = 0.21). Further hammer drill studies are needed to specify machine-specific motor speed reductions for comparing the results of different studies. The isolated effects could be used by manufacturers to implement control strategies for automatic optimizations. Based on the feed force, motor speed could be varied to optimize vibration or productivity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50317,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814123001166","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Construction workers usually use hammer drills to drill holes into hard materials for anchors or concrete screw installations. Vibration emission in the drilling process can cause various occupational diseases. Workers influence this process mainly by varying the feed force. A feed force variation in hammer drilling causes a machine-specific motor speed reduction. As it is impossible to distinguish the effect of feed force on vibration and productivity from machine-specific motor speed reduction effects, the findings of various studies on hammer drilling vary considerably. The goal of this study therefore is to identify the feed force effect on vibration and productivity, thus excluding machine-specific effects due to a motor speed reduction. We modified a hammer drill to keep motor speeds constant over a wide feed force range and conducted a drilling study using an automated drilling test rig. The drilling productivity increased with higher feed force, whereas machine-specific motor speed reduction led to a decrease. Evaluated with Cohen's f, both factors had a large effect (feed force: f = 0.62, motor speed: f = 0.42). An increasing feed force led to a higher vibration emission with a large effect (f = 1.03). Motor speed reduction reduced vibration with a small effect (f = 0.21). Further hammer drill studies are needed to specify machine-specific motor speed reductions for comparing the results of different studies. The isolated effects could be used by manufacturers to implement control strategies for automatic optimizations. Based on the feed force, motor speed could be varied to optimize vibration or productivity.

进给力对锤钻振动和生产率的影响:排除电机减速影响的机械独立分析
建筑工人通常使用冲击钻在坚硬的材料上钻孔,用于锚或混凝土螺钉安装。钻孔过程中产生的振动会引起各种职业病。工人主要通过改变进给力来影响这个过程。在锤式钻孔中,进给力的变化会导致机器特定的电机速度降低。由于不可能将进给力对振动和生产率的影响与机器特定的电机减速效应区分开来,因此各种关于锤钻的研究结果差异很大。因此,本研究的目标是确定进给力对振动和生产率的影响,从而排除由于电机减速而导致的机器特定影响。我们对冲击钻进行了改进,使其在大进给力范围内保持电机转速不变,并使用自动钻井测试平台进行了钻井研究。随着进给力的增加,钻井产能增加,而机器特定的电机转速降低会导致钻井产能下降。用Cohen's f评价,这两个因素都有很大的影响(进给力:f = 0.62,电机转速:f = 0.42)。进给力的增大导致振动发射增大,且影响较大(f = 1.03)。电机转速降低对振动的影响较小(f = 0.21)。为了比较不同研究的结果,需要进一步的冲击钻研究来指定特定于机器的电机减速。这些孤立效应可以被制造商用来实施自动优化的控制策略。根据进给力,可以改变电机速度以优化振动或生产率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
110
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions that add to our understanding of the role of humans in today systems and the interactions thereof with various system components. The journal typically covers the following areas: industrial and occupational ergonomics, design of systems, tools and equipment, human performance measurement and modeling, human productivity, humans in technologically complex systems, and safety. The focus of the articles includes basic theoretical advances, applications, case studies, new methodologies and procedures; and empirical studies.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信