Surgical Outcome of Proximal Isolated Subclavian Artery Aneurysms: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study.

IF 1.5 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Journal of Endovascular Therapy Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-19 DOI:10.1177/15266028231210221
Yuanrui Gu, Ke Zhang, Zeming Zhou, Yangxue Sun, Mingyao Li, Yunhong Wang, Chenxi Ouyang
{"title":"Surgical Outcome of Proximal Isolated Subclavian Artery Aneurysms: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study.","authors":"Yuanrui Gu, Ke Zhang, Zeming Zhou, Yangxue Sun, Mingyao Li, Yunhong Wang, Chenxi Ouyang","doi":"10.1177/15266028231210221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to introduce our institutional experience of treatment strategies (cervical subclavian artery reconstruction, thoracotomy subclavian artery reconstruction and endovascular treatment) for proximal isolated subclavian artery aneurysms (PISAAs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>we retrospectively analyzed 15 consecutive patients with PISAAs treated by different treatment strategies (cervical reconstruction, thoracotomy reconstruction and endovascular treatment) in our institution from May 2016 to May 2022. Baseline data, surgery-related data, postoperative information and long-term follow-up were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17 PISAAs in 15 consecutive patients were treated in our institution. The success rates of subclavian artery reconstruction in the cervical reconstruction, the thoracotomy reconstruction and the endovascular treatment were 100%, 100 and 83.33%, respectively. About the involved vertebral artery, the reconstruction rates in the cervical reconstruction, the thoracotomy reconstruction, and the endovascular treatment were 80%, 75%, and 0, respectively. The intraoperative blood loss in the thoracotomy reconstruction was significantly higher than that in the cervical reconstruction and the endovascular treatment (<i>p</i><0.05). The total operation time of the thoracotomy reconstruction was significantly longer than that of the cervical reconstruction and the endovascular treatment (<i>p</i><0.05). In terms of postoperative ventilator use time, total postoperative drainage fluid, total postoperative drainage time, and ICU duration, both the thoracotomy reconstruction and the cervical reconstruction were significantly more than the endovascular treatment (<i>p</i><0.05). During the follow-up, one patient in the endovascular treatment underwent re-intervention 22 months after surgery due to in-stent occlusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For patients with PISAAs, different treatment strategies are recommended depending on the size of the aneurysms and whether the involved vertebral arteries require reconstruction.Clinical impactThis article is the largest study on the treatment strategies of PISAAs. By comparing the prognosis and complications of endovascular treatment with those of open surgery, it provides a certain reference basis for the choice of treatment for patients with PISAAs. For patients with aneurysms' diameter of >50 mm, the thoracotomy subclavian artery reconstruction is recommended; for patients with aneurysms' diameter of <30 mm requiring reconstruction of the involved vertebral arteries, the cervical subclavian artery reconstruction is recommended; for patients with aneurysms' diameter of <30 mm not requiring reconstruction of the involved vertebral arteries, the endovascular treatment is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1083-1094"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028231210221","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to introduce our institutional experience of treatment strategies (cervical subclavian artery reconstruction, thoracotomy subclavian artery reconstruction and endovascular treatment) for proximal isolated subclavian artery aneurysms (PISAAs).

Methods: we retrospectively analyzed 15 consecutive patients with PISAAs treated by different treatment strategies (cervical reconstruction, thoracotomy reconstruction and endovascular treatment) in our institution from May 2016 to May 2022. Baseline data, surgery-related data, postoperative information and long-term follow-up were assessed.

Results: A total of 17 PISAAs in 15 consecutive patients were treated in our institution. The success rates of subclavian artery reconstruction in the cervical reconstruction, the thoracotomy reconstruction and the endovascular treatment were 100%, 100 and 83.33%, respectively. About the involved vertebral artery, the reconstruction rates in the cervical reconstruction, the thoracotomy reconstruction, and the endovascular treatment were 80%, 75%, and 0, respectively. The intraoperative blood loss in the thoracotomy reconstruction was significantly higher than that in the cervical reconstruction and the endovascular treatment (p<0.05). The total operation time of the thoracotomy reconstruction was significantly longer than that of the cervical reconstruction and the endovascular treatment (p<0.05). In terms of postoperative ventilator use time, total postoperative drainage fluid, total postoperative drainage time, and ICU duration, both the thoracotomy reconstruction and the cervical reconstruction were significantly more than the endovascular treatment (p<0.05). During the follow-up, one patient in the endovascular treatment underwent re-intervention 22 months after surgery due to in-stent occlusion.

Conclusions: For patients with PISAAs, different treatment strategies are recommended depending on the size of the aneurysms and whether the involved vertebral arteries require reconstruction.Clinical impactThis article is the largest study on the treatment strategies of PISAAs. By comparing the prognosis and complications of endovascular treatment with those of open surgery, it provides a certain reference basis for the choice of treatment for patients with PISAAs. For patients with aneurysms' diameter of >50 mm, the thoracotomy subclavian artery reconstruction is recommended; for patients with aneurysms' diameter of <30 mm requiring reconstruction of the involved vertebral arteries, the cervical subclavian artery reconstruction is recommended; for patients with aneurysms' diameter of <30 mm not requiring reconstruction of the involved vertebral arteries, the endovascular treatment is recommended.

近端孤立锁骨下动脉瘤的手术疗效:一项单中心回顾性观察研究。
目的:介绍我院对近端孤立性锁骨下动脉瘤(PISAAs)的治疗策略(颈椎锁骨下动脉重建术、开胸锁骨下动脉重建术和血管内治疗)的经验。方法:回顾性分析我院2016年5月至2022年5月连续15例采用不同治疗策略(颈椎重建术、开胸重建术和血管内治疗)的pisaa患者。评估基线数据、手术相关数据、术后信息和长期随访。结果:我院连续收治15例患者共17例pisaa。锁骨下动脉重建术在颈椎重建术、开胸重建术和血管内治疗中的成功率分别为100%、100%和83.33%。对于受累椎动脉,颈椎重建术、开胸重建术和血管内治疗的重建率分别为80%、75%和0%。开胸重建术中出血量明显高于颈椎重建及血管内治疗(ppp)结论:对于PISAAs患者,根据动脉瘤大小及累及椎动脉是否需要重建,推荐不同的治疗策略。临床影响:这篇文章是目前关于pisaa治疗策略的最大规模的研究。通过对比血管内治疗与开放手术的预后及并发症,为pisaa患者的治疗选择提供一定的参考依据。对于动脉瘤直径在bb0 ~ 50mm的患者,建议行开胸锁骨下动脉重建;对于动脉瘤直径为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信