Development of an Emergency Department Case Management Case-Finding Tool.

IF 0.8 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
David Gallagher, Barbara Bentley, Ashley Barry, Amy Fraccola, Rosimeire Santos, Adam Glenn, James Howard, Aparna Kamath, Katie Flanagan
{"title":"Development of an Emergency Department Case Management Case-Finding Tool.","authors":"David Gallagher, Barbara Bentley, Ashley Barry, Amy Fraccola, Rosimeire Santos, Adam Glenn, James Howard, Aparna Kamath, Katie Flanagan","doi":"10.1097/NCM.0000000000000699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of study: </strong>Identifying emergency department (ED) patients who are at high risk for return visits is an important goal for case management to improve patient care. This quality improvement study describes the development and evaluation of the Emergency Department Case Management Priority Score (EDCMPS), an electronic medical record (EMR)-based \"case-finding\" system, and its ability to identify these high-risk patients. In addition, the authors present data about its acceptability among emergency department case managers (ED CMs).</p><p><strong>Primary practice settings: </strong>Emergency departments with case management availability and staffing.</p><p><strong>Methodology and sample: </strong>A retrospective analysis at Duke University Hospital ED compared patient data pre- and postimplementation of the EDCMPS. The tool was developed using the LEAN and Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) quality improvement methodologies, with ED CM participation. ED return and hospitalization rates within 7 and 30 days between both methods were compared, and a survey evaluated CM satisfaction with the EDCMPS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 2-month preintervention period (July 1, 2022, to August 31, 2022) included 8,677 patients discharged from the ED, with 897 patients (10.3%) identified as at high risk for return based on the previous manual methodology. In the 3-month postintervention period (September 1, 2022, to November 30, 2022), there were 13,566 patients discharged, with 692 patients (5.1%) identified as at high risk for return using the EDCMPS. The EDCMPS outperformed the manual method, yielding a significantly higher odds ratio (OR) for 7- and 30-day ED return or hospitalization (e.g., 30-day any return OR = 4.21 vs. 1.69). The survey showed broad ED CM agreement on the tool's superior performance, especially in organizing outpatient resources and referring to support programs. However, challenges in securing primary care follow-up, housing, and health insurance applications were identified. The tool's collaborative development approach ensured its fit to ED CM needs, contributing to its success.</p><p><strong>Implications for case management practice: </strong>The EDCMPS showcases promise in enhancing ED CM efficiency, with strong frontline staff endorsement. It pinpoints areas needing focus for patient support and has the potential to reduce ED revisits and therefore health care utilization. Its methodology offers insights for similar future implementations in health care institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":45015,"journal":{"name":"Professional Case Management","volume":" ","pages":"102-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10984631/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Professional Case Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCM.0000000000000699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of study: Identifying emergency department (ED) patients who are at high risk for return visits is an important goal for case management to improve patient care. This quality improvement study describes the development and evaluation of the Emergency Department Case Management Priority Score (EDCMPS), an electronic medical record (EMR)-based "case-finding" system, and its ability to identify these high-risk patients. In addition, the authors present data about its acceptability among emergency department case managers (ED CMs).

Primary practice settings: Emergency departments with case management availability and staffing.

Methodology and sample: A retrospective analysis at Duke University Hospital ED compared patient data pre- and postimplementation of the EDCMPS. The tool was developed using the LEAN and Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) quality improvement methodologies, with ED CM participation. ED return and hospitalization rates within 7 and 30 days between both methods were compared, and a survey evaluated CM satisfaction with the EDCMPS.

Results: The 2-month preintervention period (July 1, 2022, to August 31, 2022) included 8,677 patients discharged from the ED, with 897 patients (10.3%) identified as at high risk for return based on the previous manual methodology. In the 3-month postintervention period (September 1, 2022, to November 30, 2022), there were 13,566 patients discharged, with 692 patients (5.1%) identified as at high risk for return using the EDCMPS. The EDCMPS outperformed the manual method, yielding a significantly higher odds ratio (OR) for 7- and 30-day ED return or hospitalization (e.g., 30-day any return OR = 4.21 vs. 1.69). The survey showed broad ED CM agreement on the tool's superior performance, especially in organizing outpatient resources and referring to support programs. However, challenges in securing primary care follow-up, housing, and health insurance applications were identified. The tool's collaborative development approach ensured its fit to ED CM needs, contributing to its success.

Implications for case management practice: The EDCMPS showcases promise in enhancing ED CM efficiency, with strong frontline staff endorsement. It pinpoints areas needing focus for patient support and has the potential to reduce ED revisits and therefore health care utilization. Its methodology offers insights for similar future implementations in health care institutions.

急诊科案例管理案例查找工具的开发。
研究目的:识别急诊科(ED)高危复诊患者是病例管理提高患者护理水平的重要目标。这项质量改进研究描述了急诊科病例管理优先评分(EDCMPS)的发展和评估,EDCMPS是一种基于电子病历(EMR)的“病例发现”系统,以及它识别这些高风险患者的能力。此外,作者还提供了有关其在急诊科病例管理人员(ED CMs)中的可接受性的数据。主要实践设置:具有病例管理可用性和人员配置的急诊科。方法和样本:杜克大学医院ED的一项回顾性分析比较了实施EDCMPS前后的患者数据。该工具是使用精益生产和计划-执行-研究-行动(PDSA)质量改进方法开发的,ED CM参与其中。比较两种方法在7天和30天内ED的复发和住院率,并通过调查评估CM对EDCMPS的满意度。结果:2个月的预干预期(2022年7月1日至2022年8月31日)包括8,677例从急诊科出院的患者,其中897例(10.3%)患者根据先前的人工方法确定为高危复发。在干预后的3个月期间(2022年9月1日至2022年11月30日),有13566名患者出院,其中692名患者(5.1%)被EDCMPS确定为复发高风险。EDCMPS优于手工方法,7天和30天ED复发或住院的优势比(OR)明显更高(例如,30天任何复发OR = 4.21 vs. 1.69)。调查显示,ED CM广泛认同该工具的优越性能,特别是在组织门诊资源和参考支持方案方面。然而,确定了在确保初级保健后续行动、住房和健康保险申请方面的挑战。该工具的协作开发方法确保了它适合ED CM的需求,从而促成了它的成功。对个案管理实践的启示:EDCMPS展示了提高edcm效率的承诺,得到了前线员工的大力支持。它指出了需要重点支持患者的领域,并有可能减少急诊科的回访,从而减少医疗保健的利用。它的方法为今后在卫生保健机构中类似的实施提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Professional Case Management
Professional Case Management HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
26.70%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Professional Case Management: The Leader in Evidence-Based Practice is a peer-reviewed, contemporary journal that crosses all case management settings. The Journal features best practices and industry benchmarks for the professional case manager and also features hands-on information for case managers new to the specialty. Articles focus on the coordination of services, management of payer issues, population- and disease-specific aspects of patient care, efficient use of resources, improving the quality of care/patient safety, data and outcomes analysis, and patient advocacy. The Journal provides practical, hands-on information for day-to-day activities, as well as cutting-edge research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信