General practitioners' role in safeguarding patients with dementia in their use of dietary supplements. A qualitative study.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-07 DOI:10.1080/02813432.2023.2283182
Hilde Risvoll, Torsten Risør, Kjell H Halvorsen, Marit Waaseth, Trine Stub, Trude Giverhaug, Frauke Musial
{"title":"General practitioners' role in safeguarding patients with dementia in their use of dietary supplements. A qualitative study.","authors":"Hilde Risvoll, Torsten Risør, Kjell H Halvorsen, Marit Waaseth, Trine Stub, Trude Giverhaug, Frauke Musial","doi":"10.1080/02813432.2023.2283182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The use of dietary supplements (DS) may cause harm through direct and indirect effects. Patients with dementia may be particularly vulnerable. This study aims to explore general practitioners' (GPs') experiences with DS use by these patients, the GPs perceived responsibilities, obstacles in taking on this responsibility, their attitudes toward DS, and suggestions for improvements to safeguard the use of DS in this patient group.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative individual interview study conducted February - December 2019. Data were analysed using systematic text condensation.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Primary healthcare clinics in Norway.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Fourteen Norwegian GPs.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>None of the informants were dismissive of patients using DS. They were aware of the possible direct risks and had observed them in patients. Most GPs showed little awareness of potential indirect risks to patients with dementia who use DS. They acknowledged the need for caretaking of these patients. Although there were differences in practice styles, most of the GPs wished to help their patients safeguarding DS use but found it difficult due to the lack of quality assurance of product information. Furthermore, there were no effective ways for the GPs to document DS use in the patients' records. Several suggestions for improvement were given by the GPs, such as increased attention from GPs, inclusion of DS in the prescription software, and stricter regulatory systems for DS from the authorities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The GPs had initially little awareness of this safety risk, but there were differences in practice style and attitudes towards DS. The GPs did not perceive themselves as main responsible for safe use of DS in patient with dementia. The most important reason to disclaim responsibility was lack of information about the products. One suggestion for improvement was better integration of DS in patients' medical record.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10851825/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2023.2283182","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The use of dietary supplements (DS) may cause harm through direct and indirect effects. Patients with dementia may be particularly vulnerable. This study aims to explore general practitioners' (GPs') experiences with DS use by these patients, the GPs perceived responsibilities, obstacles in taking on this responsibility, their attitudes toward DS, and suggestions for improvements to safeguard the use of DS in this patient group.

Design: Qualitative individual interview study conducted February - December 2019. Data were analysed using systematic text condensation.

Setting: Primary healthcare clinics in Norway.

Subjects: Fourteen Norwegian GPs.

Findings: None of the informants were dismissive of patients using DS. They were aware of the possible direct risks and had observed them in patients. Most GPs showed little awareness of potential indirect risks to patients with dementia who use DS. They acknowledged the need for caretaking of these patients. Although there were differences in practice styles, most of the GPs wished to help their patients safeguarding DS use but found it difficult due to the lack of quality assurance of product information. Furthermore, there were no effective ways for the GPs to document DS use in the patients' records. Several suggestions for improvement were given by the GPs, such as increased attention from GPs, inclusion of DS in the prescription software, and stricter regulatory systems for DS from the authorities.

Conclusion: The GPs had initially little awareness of this safety risk, but there were differences in practice style and attitudes towards DS. The GPs did not perceive themselves as main responsible for safe use of DS in patient with dementia. The most important reason to disclaim responsibility was lack of information about the products. One suggestion for improvement was better integration of DS in patients' medical record.

全科医生在保障痴呆症患者使用膳食补充剂方面的作用。定性研究。
目的:膳食补充剂的使用可能通过直接和间接的影响造成危害。痴呆症患者可能特别容易受到伤害。本研究旨在探讨全科医生(gp)对这些患者使用退行性椎体滑移的经验、全科医生认为的责任、承担责任的障碍、他们对退行性椎体滑移的态度,以及改善建议,以保障这一患者群体使用退行性椎体滑移。设计:定性个人访谈研究于2019年2月至12月进行。数据分析使用系统文本浓缩。环境:挪威的初级保健诊所。受试者:14名挪威全科医生。研究结果:没有人对使用退行性椎体滑移的患者不屑一顾。他们意识到可能存在的直接风险,并观察了患者的情况。大多数全科医生几乎没有意识到使用退行性痴呆患者的潜在间接风险。他们承认有必要照顾这些病人。虽然执业风格存在差异,但大多数全科医生都希望帮助患者保障DS的使用,但由于缺乏产品信息的质量保证,这很难做到。此外,全科医生没有有效的方法在患者病历中记录DS的使用情况。全科医生提出了一些改进建议,例如增加全科医生的关注,将DS纳入处方软件,以及当局对DS的更严格监管体系。结论:全科医生最初对这种安全风险的认识很少,但在实践方式和对退行性椎体滑移的态度上存在差异。全科医生并不认为自己对痴呆患者安全使用DS负有主要责任。不承担责任最重要的原因是缺乏关于产品的信息。改进的建议之一是更好地整合患者病历中的DS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信