Evaluating the Safety of an Educational Deprescribing Intervention: Lessons from the Optimize Trial.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Drugs & Aging Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-20 DOI:10.1007/s40266-023-01080-y
Cynthia M Boyd, Susan M Shetterly, John D Powers, Linda A Weffald, Ariel R Green, Orla C Sheehan, Emily Reeve, Melanie L Drace, Jonathan D Norton, Mahesh Maiyani, Kathy S Gleason, Jennifer K Sawyer, Matthew L Maciejewski, Jennifer L Wolff, Courtney Kraus, Elizabeth A Bayliss
{"title":"Evaluating the Safety of an Educational Deprescribing Intervention: Lessons from the Optimize Trial.","authors":"Cynthia M Boyd, Susan M Shetterly, John D Powers, Linda A Weffald, Ariel R Green, Orla C Sheehan, Emily Reeve, Melanie L Drace, Jonathan D Norton, Mahesh Maiyani, Kathy S Gleason, Jennifer K Sawyer, Matthew L Maciejewski, Jennifer L Wolff, Courtney Kraus, Elizabeth A Bayliss","doi":"10.1007/s40266-023-01080-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients, family members, and clinicians express concerns about potential adverse drug withdrawal events (ADWEs) following medication discontinuation or fears of upsetting a stable medical equilibrium as key barriers to deprescribing. Currently, there are limited methods to pragmatically assess the safety of deprescribing and ascertain ADWEs. We report the methods and results of safety monitoring for the OPTIMIZE trial of deprescribing education for patients, family members, and clinicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a pragmatic cluster randomized trial with multivariable Poisson regression comparing outcome rates between study arms. We conducted clinical record review and adjudication of sampled records to assess potential causal relationships between medication discontinuation and outcomes. This study included adults aged 65+ with dementia or mild cognitive impairment, one or more additional chronic conditions, and prescribed 5+ chronic medications. The intervention included an educational brochure on deprescribing that was mailed to patients prior to primary care visits, a clinician notification about individual brochure mailings, and an educational tip sheets was provided monthly to primary care clinicians. The outcomes of the safety monitoring were rates of hospitalizations and mortality during the 4 months following brochure mailings and results of record review and adjudication. The adjudication process was conducted throughout the trial and included classifications: likely, possibly, and unlikely.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a total of 3012 (1433 intervention and 1579 control) participants. There were 420 total hospitalizations involving 269 (18.8%) people in the intervention versus 517 total hospitalizations involving 317 (20.1%) people in the control groups. Adjusted risk ratios comparing intervention to control groups were 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72, 1.16] for hospitalization and 1.19 (95% CI 0.67, 2.11) for mortality. Both groups had zero deaths \"likely\" attributed to a medication change prior to the event. A total of 3 out of 30 (10%) intervention group hospitalizations and 7 out of 35 (20%) control group hospitalizations were considered \"likely\" due to a medication change.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Population-based deprescribing education is safe in the older adult population with cognitive impairment in our study. Pragmatic methods for safety monitoring are needed to further inform deprescribing interventions.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT03984396. Registered on 13 June 2019.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"45-54"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11101016/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-023-01080-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients, family members, and clinicians express concerns about potential adverse drug withdrawal events (ADWEs) following medication discontinuation or fears of upsetting a stable medical equilibrium as key barriers to deprescribing. Currently, there are limited methods to pragmatically assess the safety of deprescribing and ascertain ADWEs. We report the methods and results of safety monitoring for the OPTIMIZE trial of deprescribing education for patients, family members, and clinicians.

Methods: This was a pragmatic cluster randomized trial with multivariable Poisson regression comparing outcome rates between study arms. We conducted clinical record review and adjudication of sampled records to assess potential causal relationships between medication discontinuation and outcomes. This study included adults aged 65+ with dementia or mild cognitive impairment, one or more additional chronic conditions, and prescribed 5+ chronic medications. The intervention included an educational brochure on deprescribing that was mailed to patients prior to primary care visits, a clinician notification about individual brochure mailings, and an educational tip sheets was provided monthly to primary care clinicians. The outcomes of the safety monitoring were rates of hospitalizations and mortality during the 4 months following brochure mailings and results of record review and adjudication. The adjudication process was conducted throughout the trial and included classifications: likely, possibly, and unlikely.

Results: There was a total of 3012 (1433 intervention and 1579 control) participants. There were 420 total hospitalizations involving 269 (18.8%) people in the intervention versus 517 total hospitalizations involving 317 (20.1%) people in the control groups. Adjusted risk ratios comparing intervention to control groups were 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72, 1.16] for hospitalization and 1.19 (95% CI 0.67, 2.11) for mortality. Both groups had zero deaths "likely" attributed to a medication change prior to the event. A total of 3 out of 30 (10%) intervention group hospitalizations and 7 out of 35 (20%) control group hospitalizations were considered "likely" due to a medication change.

Conclusions: Population-based deprescribing education is safe in the older adult population with cognitive impairment in our study. Pragmatic methods for safety monitoring are needed to further inform deprescribing interventions.

Trial registration: NCT03984396. Registered on 13 June 2019.

Abstract Image

评价教育处方干预的安全性:来自优化试验的经验教训。
背景:患者、家庭成员和临床医生表达了对停药后潜在的药物不良戒断事件(ADWEs)的担忧,或对破坏稳定的药物平衡的恐惧,这是解除处方的主要障碍。目前,实际评估处方安全性和确定ADWEs的方法有限。我们报告了对患者、家庭成员和临床医生进行处方教育的最优化试验的安全监测方法和结果。方法:这是一项实用的聚类随机试验,采用多变量泊松回归比较研究组之间的转归率。我们进行了临床记录审查和抽样记录的裁决,以评估停药和结果之间的潜在因果关系。这项研究包括65岁以上患有痴呆或轻度认知障碍的成年人,一种或多种额外的慢性疾病,并规定了5种以上的慢性药物。干预措施包括在初级保健访问之前向患者邮寄关于处方的教育小册子,关于个人小册子邮寄的临床医生通知,以及每月向初级保健临床医生提供教育提示表。安全监测的结果是邮寄宣传册后4个月内的住院率和死亡率,以及记录审查和裁决的结果。审判过程贯穿整个审判过程,包括分类:可能、可能和不太可能。结果:共3012名参与者(干预组1433名,对照组1579名)。干预组共有420人住院,涉及269人(18.8%),对照组共有517人住院,涉及317人(20.1%)。干预组与对照组的住院率校正风险比为0.92[95%可信区间(CI) 0.72, 1.16],死亡率校正风险比为1.19 (95% CI 0.67, 2.11)。两组都没有“可能”归因于事件发生前药物变化的死亡。干预组30例住院患者中有3例(10%),对照组35例住院患者中有7例(20%)被认为“可能”是因为药物改变。结论:在我们的研究中,以人群为基础的处方性教育在老年认知障碍人群中是安全的。需要实用的安全监测方法来进一步为处方干预提供信息。试验注册:NCT03984396。2019年6月13日注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drugs & Aging
Drugs & Aging 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs & Aging delivers essential information on the most important aspects of drug therapy to professionals involved in the care of the elderly. The journal addresses in a timely way the major issues relating to drug therapy in older adults including: the management of specific diseases, particularly those associated with aging, age-related physiological changes impacting drug therapy, drug utilization and prescribing in the elderly, polypharmacy and drug interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信