Cases

Q4 Social Sciences

Environmental Law and Management Pub Date : 1999-06-21 DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0941(199901/04)11:1/2<11::AID-ELM134>3.0.CO;2-U

{"title":"Cases","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1099-0941(199901/04)11:1/2<11::AID-ELM134>3.0.CO;2-U","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> EU Law</h3>\n \n <p><i>Mighell v Reading, Evans v Motor Insurers' Bureau, White v White</i>—further clarification of the direct effect doctrine.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Civil Liability</h3>\n \n <p><i>Harris v Evans</i>—restrictions placed on the civil liability of regulatory bodies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highways</h3>\n \n <p><i>Westley v Hertfordshire CC</i>—distinction between disrepair and obstruction of a way—not all nuisances are statutory nuisances.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Planning</h3>\n \n <p><i>R v Secretary of State ex parte Walsall MBC</i>—problems arising over an infill condition—implied permission for waste deposition.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Waste</h3>\n \n <p><i>Agency v Short</i>—the problems of relying on unsubstantiated assurances.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":39650,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Law and Management","volume":"11 1-2","pages":"11-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Law and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-0941%28199901/04%2911%3A1/2%3C11%3A%3AAID-ELM134%3E3.0.CO%3B2-U","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

EU Law

Mighell v Reading, Evans v Motor Insurers' Bureau, White v White—further clarification of the direct effect doctrine.

Civil Liability

Harris v Evans—restrictions placed on the civil liability of regulatory bodies.

Highways

Westley v Hertfordshire CC—distinction between disrepair and obstruction of a way—not all nuisances are statutory nuisances.

Planning

R v Secretary of State ex parte Walsall MBC—problems arising over an infill condition—implied permission for waste deposition.

Waste

Agency v Short—the problems of relying on unsubstantiated assurances.

查看原文本刊更多论文

情况下

欧盟法米格尔诉雷丁案，埃文斯诉汽车保险商局案，怀特诉怀特案，进一步澄清直接效力原则。哈里斯诉埃文斯案——对监管机构民事责任的限制。韦斯特利诉赫特福德郡一案——失修和阻碍道路的区别——并非所有妨害都是法定妨害。规划R诉国务卿部分沃尔索尔mbc -填埋条件引起的问题-暗示允许废物沉积。废物机构诉短线——依赖未经证实的保证的问题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Environmental Law and Management Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The aim of Environmental Law & Management is to provide lawyers, and other concerned professionals such as environmental consultants and managers in commerce and industry, with a coverage of rapidly developing issues in Environmental Law that is both contemporaneous and authoritative, combining the approaches of reporting developments and ensuring they are analysed so that their implications may be assessed. The objectives which the journal seeks to pursue in this connection are to provide accurate and up to date reports of recent developments in case law, statute and policy, and to reinforce this with in-depth analysis in the form of both articles and shorter items.