Discrimination between follicular adenoma and follicular carcinoma of the thyroid: preoperative validity of cytometry on aspiration smears.

Applied pathology Pub Date : 1989-01-01
R Montironi, R Alberti, S Sisti, A Braccischi, M Scarpelli, G M Mariuzzi
{"title":"Discrimination between follicular adenoma and follicular carcinoma of the thyroid: preoperative validity of cytometry on aspiration smears.","authors":"R Montironi,&nbsp;R Alberti,&nbsp;S Sisti,&nbsp;A Braccischi,&nbsp;M Scarpelli,&nbsp;G M Mariuzzi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of our study was to evaluate the validity of the quantitative analysis of nuclear features on aspiration smears in the distinction between follicular adenoma and follicular carcinoma. Karyometric and DNA features, including the nucleolar count, were evaluated on the cytologic material of 28 cases; the values were in general slightly higher in the carcinomas than in the adenomas, with overlap between the two diagnostic groups. By plotting the two most discriminant and least correlated parameters against each other and by drawing two straight lines (one perpendicular to the axis representing the mean of the major nuclear diameter at the 9-microns point, the other perpendicular to the axis of the percentage of nucleolated cells at the 75% point), we obtained two regions: a rectangle delimited by the two axes and the two lines containing 86% of adenomas, and the remaining part of the plane containing 79% of carcinomas. The validity of this approach was tested in 32 new cases not included in the original bivariate classification: accuracy 87%; sensitivity 86%; specificity 88%; predictive value of adenoma 88%; predictive value of carcinoma 85%. In conclusion, a simple cytometric method, i.e., the combined evaluation of the mean of the major nuclear diameter with the percentage of nucleolated nuclei, allows a substantial distinction to be made between follicular adenoma and carcinoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":77670,"journal":{"name":"Applied pathology","volume":"7 6","pages":"367-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of our study was to evaluate the validity of the quantitative analysis of nuclear features on aspiration smears in the distinction between follicular adenoma and follicular carcinoma. Karyometric and DNA features, including the nucleolar count, were evaluated on the cytologic material of 28 cases; the values were in general slightly higher in the carcinomas than in the adenomas, with overlap between the two diagnostic groups. By plotting the two most discriminant and least correlated parameters against each other and by drawing two straight lines (one perpendicular to the axis representing the mean of the major nuclear diameter at the 9-microns point, the other perpendicular to the axis of the percentage of nucleolated cells at the 75% point), we obtained two regions: a rectangle delimited by the two axes and the two lines containing 86% of adenomas, and the remaining part of the plane containing 79% of carcinomas. The validity of this approach was tested in 32 new cases not included in the original bivariate classification: accuracy 87%; sensitivity 86%; specificity 88%; predictive value of adenoma 88%; predictive value of carcinoma 85%. In conclusion, a simple cytometric method, i.e., the combined evaluation of the mean of the major nuclear diameter with the percentage of nucleolated nuclei, allows a substantial distinction to be made between follicular adenoma and carcinoma.

甲状腺滤泡腺瘤与滤泡癌的鉴别:术前吸吸涂片细胞计数的有效性。
本研究的目的是评估吸痰涂片核特征定量分析在区分滤泡腺瘤和滤泡癌中的有效性。对28例患者的细胞学材料进行核计量和DNA特征(包括核仁计数)评估;一般来说,癌的数值略高于腺瘤,在两组诊断中有重叠。通过绘制两个最判别和至少相关参数对彼此和画两条直线,(一个垂直于轴代表的意思是主要的核直径9-microns点,另一个垂直于轴线有细胞核的细胞的百分比在75%点),我们得到两个区域:一个矩形分隔两个轴和两行包含腺瘤的86%,剩下的部分包含79%的癌的飞机。该方法的有效性在32例未包括在原始二元分类中的新病例中进行了测试:准确率为87%;灵敏度86%;特异性88%;腺瘤的预测值88%;癌的预测值为85%。总之,一种简单的细胞术方法,即综合评价大核直径的平均值和成核核的百分比,可以对滤泡腺瘤和癌进行实质性的区分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信