Disagreement between hedge funds and other institutional investors and the cross-section of expected stock returns

IF 2.6 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Mustafa O. Caglayan, Umut Celiker, Gokhan Sonaer
{"title":"Disagreement between hedge funds and other institutional investors and the cross-section of expected stock returns","authors":"Mustafa O. Caglayan,&nbsp;Umut Celiker,&nbsp;Gokhan Sonaer","doi":"10.1111/fire.12308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We find strong disagreements between hedge funds and other institutions in their common stock trades are twice as likely as agreements. Overall success of hedge funds’ trades and poor performance of non-hedge funds’ trades are both confined to disagreement stocks. Although hedge funds are commonly positive feedback traders, they are neither positive nor negative feedback traders for stocks heavily sold by other institutions. Hedge funds also depend less on earnings news. Our findings highlight the importance of disagreement in studying the performance of institutional investors’ trades and are consistent with the notion that skilled investors rely less on public information.</p>","PeriodicalId":47617,"journal":{"name":"FINANCIAL REVIEW","volume":"57 3","pages":"663-689"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FINANCIAL REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fire.12308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We find strong disagreements between hedge funds and other institutions in their common stock trades are twice as likely as agreements. Overall success of hedge funds’ trades and poor performance of non-hedge funds’ trades are both confined to disagreement stocks. Although hedge funds are commonly positive feedback traders, they are neither positive nor negative feedback traders for stocks heavily sold by other institutions. Hedge funds also depend less on earnings news. Our findings highlight the importance of disagreement in studying the performance of institutional investors’ trades and are consistent with the notion that skilled investors rely less on public information.

对冲基金和其他机构投资者之间的分歧以及股票预期收益的横截面
我们发现,对冲基金与其他机构在普通股交易中出现强烈分歧的可能性是达成一致的两倍。对冲基金交易的总体成功和非对冲基金交易的糟糕表现都局限于不一致的股票。尽管对冲基金通常是正反馈交易者,但对于其他机构大量卖出的股票,它们既不是正反馈交易者,也不是负反馈交易者。对冲基金对收益消息的依赖程度也有所下降。我们的研究结果强调了在研究机构投资者交易绩效时分歧的重要性,并与熟练投资者较少依赖公开信息的观点一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
FINANCIAL REVIEW
FINANCIAL REVIEW BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
28.10%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信