[Cervical ripening and induction of labor in term pregnancy using prostaglandin E2. Controlled clinical study comparing the intracervical and intravaginal routes].

A Zanini, S Norchi, E Beretta, I Cortinovis, G Fenaroli, A Scian
{"title":"[Cervical ripening and induction of labor in term pregnancy using prostaglandin E2. Controlled clinical study comparing the intracervical and intravaginal routes].","authors":"A Zanini,&nbsp;S Norchi,&nbsp;E Beretta,&nbsp;I Cortinovis,&nbsp;G Fenaroli,&nbsp;A Scian","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>106 term pregnant patients with unfavorable local condition (B.S. less than or equal to 5) and indication to induction of labour because of mother or fetus problems, were randomized for a controlled clinical trial. 52 patients (group A) received 0.5 mg. of PGE2 in 2 ml of tylose gel intracervically. 48 patients (group B) received 3.0 mg. of PGE2 in 5 ml of tylose gel intravaginally. 6 patients were excluded because of violation of protocol. The aim of our study was to evaluate the best method of cervical ripening before a classical induction with amniotomy and oxytocin. Our results show that intracervical PGE2 gel seems to have a better effect on the ripening of the cervix than the intravaginal one if we only consider the proposition of softening success (group A 14/52; group B 6/48). If the evaluation of the effect on the cervical ripening is made according to modification of Bishop's score after gel application, the situation seems inverted because the medians values of the modifications have obtained respectively for group A and B a variation of 2.0 and 3.0 points. Moreover the intravaginal way showed a significantly higher incidence of collateral effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":75513,"journal":{"name":"Annali di ostetricia, ginecologia, medicina perinatale","volume":"110 5","pages":"209-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali di ostetricia, ginecologia, medicina perinatale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

106 term pregnant patients with unfavorable local condition (B.S. less than or equal to 5) and indication to induction of labour because of mother or fetus problems, were randomized for a controlled clinical trial. 52 patients (group A) received 0.5 mg. of PGE2 in 2 ml of tylose gel intracervically. 48 patients (group B) received 3.0 mg. of PGE2 in 5 ml of tylose gel intravaginally. 6 patients were excluded because of violation of protocol. The aim of our study was to evaluate the best method of cervical ripening before a classical induction with amniotomy and oxytocin. Our results show that intracervical PGE2 gel seems to have a better effect on the ripening of the cervix than the intravaginal one if we only consider the proposition of softening success (group A 14/52; group B 6/48). If the evaluation of the effect on the cervical ripening is made according to modification of Bishop's score after gel application, the situation seems inverted because the medians values of the modifications have obtained respectively for group A and B a variation of 2.0 and 3.0 points. Moreover the intravaginal way showed a significantly higher incidence of collateral effects.

前列腺素E2用于足月妊娠的宫颈成熟和引产。比较宫颈内和阴道内途径的对照临床研究[j]。
106例局部条件不佳(B.S.小于或等于5)且因母或胎儿问题需要引产的足月妊娠患者随机纳入对照临床试验。A组52例,给予0.5 mg;在2ml酪糖凝胶中注射PGE2。B组48例,3.0 mg;在5毫升酪糖凝胶中静脉注射PGE2。6例患者因违反方案而被排除。我们研究的目的是评估在羊膜切开和催产素经典诱导前宫颈成熟的最佳方法。我们的研究结果表明,如果只考虑软化成功的命题,宫颈内PGE2凝胶似乎比阴道内的PGE2凝胶对宫颈成熟的影响更好(a组14/52;B组6/48)。如果根据涂抹凝胶后对Bishop评分的修改来评价对宫颈成熟的影响,情况似乎是相反的,因为A组和B组修改的中位数分别为2.0分和3.0分的变化。此外,阴道内途径的副反应发生率明显高于阴道内途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信