{"title":"[Audiometry findings, speech, impedance audiometry and BERA in acoustic neurinoma].","authors":"J Mrázek","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Audiometric examinations are essential in the diagnosis of acoustic neuroma. Experience with the diagnosis of 41 neurinomas of the acoustic nerve show, however, that the tactics of audiometric examinations vary from one case to the other. The basic examination is in all instances an accurate examination of the threshold of hearing. When the threshold is normal or there are slight or medium severe losses on the side of the lesion, the tympanogram, impedance and speech audiometry and BERA are supreme examinations and all other audiometric examinations are redundant. For BERA alone limiting losses are above 3000 to 4000 Hz. As soon as they pass at the above frequencies the borderline of 60 dB HL in proportion to the magnitude of these losses the amount of falsely positive findings increases rapidly and the importance of BERA in the diagnosis declines. The same applies to impedance audiometry if major losses interfere with medium and lower frequencies. In all these instances the importance of speech audiometry as well as of STAT (Supra Threshold Adaptation Test) increases, i.e. of traditional audiometric examinations, the latter of which can be used successfully also in very high losses round 80-90 dB HL.</p>","PeriodicalId":75692,"journal":{"name":"Ceskoslovenska otolaryngologie","volume":"38 6","pages":"340-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceskoslovenska otolaryngologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Audiometric examinations are essential in the diagnosis of acoustic neuroma. Experience with the diagnosis of 41 neurinomas of the acoustic nerve show, however, that the tactics of audiometric examinations vary from one case to the other. The basic examination is in all instances an accurate examination of the threshold of hearing. When the threshold is normal or there are slight or medium severe losses on the side of the lesion, the tympanogram, impedance and speech audiometry and BERA are supreme examinations and all other audiometric examinations are redundant. For BERA alone limiting losses are above 3000 to 4000 Hz. As soon as they pass at the above frequencies the borderline of 60 dB HL in proportion to the magnitude of these losses the amount of falsely positive findings increases rapidly and the importance of BERA in the diagnosis declines. The same applies to impedance audiometry if major losses interfere with medium and lower frequencies. In all these instances the importance of speech audiometry as well as of STAT (Supra Threshold Adaptation Test) increases, i.e. of traditional audiometric examinations, the latter of which can be used successfully also in very high losses round 80-90 dB HL.
听力检查在听神经瘤的诊断中是必不可少的。然而,对41例听神经神经鞘瘤的诊断经验表明,听力学检查的策略因病例而异。在所有情况下,基本检查都是对听力阈值的准确检查。当阈值正常或病灶一侧有轻微或中度严重损失时,鼓室图、阻抗和语音测听和BERA是最重要的检查,所有其他听力检查都是多余的。仅对BERA而言,限制损耗在3000至4000 Hz以上。一旦它们在上述频率上超过与这些损失幅度成比例的60 dB HL的界线,假阳性结果的数量就会迅速增加,而BERA在诊断中的重要性就会下降。这同样适用于阻抗测听,如果主要损失干扰中频和低频。在所有这些情况下,语音测听以及STAT(超阈值适应测试)的重要性都增加了,即传统的听力测试,后者也可以在非常高的损失(80-90 dB HL)下成功使用。