Clinical and microbiologic changes following the irrigation of periodontal pockets with metronidazole or stannous fluoride.

A J Lazzaro, N F Bissada
{"title":"Clinical and microbiologic changes following the irrigation of periodontal pockets with metronidazole or stannous fluoride.","authors":"A J Lazzaro,&nbsp;N F Bissada","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this investigation was to determine the efficacy of subgingival irrigation with 1.64% stannous fluoride or 0.5% metronidazole solutions on the clinical and microbiologic parameters of adult periodontitis as compared with scaling and root planing. Twelve patients with moderate to advanced periodontitis were selected, and one pocket of a minimum 5-mm probe depth in each quadrant received one of the following treatments: (a) one session of scaling and root planing at the beginning of the experiment, (b) stannous fluoride irrigation, (c) metronidazole irrigation, and (d) saline irrigation. Results showed that scaling and root planing provided significantly better improvement in most of the clinical parameters than did the two tested irrigants. Saline also provided a statistically significant improvement, but only during the first 4 weeks. The four methods of treatment provided a sustained decrease in spirochetes, with a concomitant increase in coccoid cells. It was concluded that although subgingival irrigation with 1.64% stannous fluoride or 0.5% metronidazole solutions improved periodontal health, they never achieved the same efficacy as scaling and root planing and, therefore, should not be substituted for fastidious mechanical subgingival plaque and calculus removal.</p>","PeriodicalId":76317,"journal":{"name":"Periodontal case reports : a publication of the Northeastern Society of Periodontists","volume":"11 1","pages":"12-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Periodontal case reports : a publication of the Northeastern Society of Periodontists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the efficacy of subgingival irrigation with 1.64% stannous fluoride or 0.5% metronidazole solutions on the clinical and microbiologic parameters of adult periodontitis as compared with scaling and root planing. Twelve patients with moderate to advanced periodontitis were selected, and one pocket of a minimum 5-mm probe depth in each quadrant received one of the following treatments: (a) one session of scaling and root planing at the beginning of the experiment, (b) stannous fluoride irrigation, (c) metronidazole irrigation, and (d) saline irrigation. Results showed that scaling and root planing provided significantly better improvement in most of the clinical parameters than did the two tested irrigants. Saline also provided a statistically significant improvement, but only during the first 4 weeks. The four methods of treatment provided a sustained decrease in spirochetes, with a concomitant increase in coccoid cells. It was concluded that although subgingival irrigation with 1.64% stannous fluoride or 0.5% metronidazole solutions improved periodontal health, they never achieved the same efficacy as scaling and root planing and, therefore, should not be substituted for fastidious mechanical subgingival plaque and calculus removal.

甲硝唑或氟化亚锡冲洗牙周袋后的临床和微生物学变化。
本研究的目的是比较1.64%氟化亚锡或0.5%甲硝唑溶液龈下冲洗对成人牙周炎临床和微生物学参数的影响,并与洁牙和刮根术进行比较。选择12例中晚期牙周炎患者,在每个象限的探针深度至少为5mm的一个袋中接受以下治疗之一:(a)在实验开始时进行一次洗牙和根平,(b)氟化亚锡冲洗,(c)甲硝唑冲洗,(d)盐水冲洗。结果表明,洗牙和刨根对大多数临床参数的改善效果明显优于两种被试冲洗剂。生理盐水也提供了统计学上显著的改善,但仅在前4周。这四种治疗方法提供了螺旋体的持续减少,伴随而来的是球虫细胞的增加。结论:虽然1.64%氟化亚锡或0.5%甲硝唑溶液龈下冲洗可改善牙周健康,但其效果远不及洗牙和牙根平整,因此不应取代精密的机械龈下菌斑和牙石清除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信