Taxing the Informal Economy: Challenges, Possibilities and Remaining Questions*

Anuradha Joshi, Wilson Prichard, Christopher Heady
{"title":"Taxing the Informal Economy: Challenges, Possibilities and Remaining Questions*","authors":"Anuradha Joshi,&nbsp;Wilson Prichard,&nbsp;Christopher Heady","doi":"10.1111/j.2040-0209.2013.00429.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Recent years have witnessed significantly increased attention to the challenge of taxing small businesses in the informal sector. However, much of this recent attention has remained focused on comparatively technical issues of revenue maximisation and policy design. This paper argues that this debate should focus increasingly on the wider development implications of informal sector taxation, as well as the political and institutional barriers to improved performance.</p>\n <p>When considering the merits of committing scarce resources to taxing small informal sector firms, debate has frequently focused on limited revenue potential, high costs of collection and potentially perverse impacts on small firms. By contrast, recent arguments have increasingly emphasised more indirect benefits of informal taxation in relation to economic growth, tax compliance and governance. These potentially broader benefits are increasingly finding support in recent research, but they are contingent on government support and consequently demand further attention.</p>\n <p>When we turn our attention away from whether tax authorities should tax small informal businesses towards the challenge of how to do so more effectively, we again argue that a broader frame of analysis is needed. Most existing research has focused on developing less distortionary tax regimes and on tax simplification in order to reduce the costs of compliance. However, while important, there strategies remain too narrow. Encouraging tax compliance demands not only lowering costs but also strengthening the potential benefits of formalisation, from increased security to new economic opportunities. As importantly, successful reform needs political support from political leaders, tax administrators and taxpayers alike. This demands greater attention to strengthening political incentives for reform, through strategic policy, administrative and institutional reform. With this in mind, the paper highlights a number of recent experiences that have sought to address these challenges, but which need further study.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100618,"journal":{"name":"IDS Working Papers","volume":"2013 429","pages":"1-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2013.00429.x","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IDS Working Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2013.00429.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed significantly increased attention to the challenge of taxing small businesses in the informal sector. However, much of this recent attention has remained focused on comparatively technical issues of revenue maximisation and policy design. This paper argues that this debate should focus increasingly on the wider development implications of informal sector taxation, as well as the political and institutional barriers to improved performance.

When considering the merits of committing scarce resources to taxing small informal sector firms, debate has frequently focused on limited revenue potential, high costs of collection and potentially perverse impacts on small firms. By contrast, recent arguments have increasingly emphasised more indirect benefits of informal taxation in relation to economic growth, tax compliance and governance. These potentially broader benefits are increasingly finding support in recent research, but they are contingent on government support and consequently demand further attention.

When we turn our attention away from whether tax authorities should tax small informal businesses towards the challenge of how to do so more effectively, we again argue that a broader frame of analysis is needed. Most existing research has focused on developing less distortionary tax regimes and on tax simplification in order to reduce the costs of compliance. However, while important, there strategies remain too narrow. Encouraging tax compliance demands not only lowering costs but also strengthening the potential benefits of formalisation, from increased security to new economic opportunities. As importantly, successful reform needs political support from political leaders, tax administrators and taxpayers alike. This demands greater attention to strengthening political incentives for reform, through strategic policy, administrative and institutional reform. With this in mind, the paper highlights a number of recent experiences that have sought to address these challenges, but which need further study.

对非正规经济征税:挑战、可能性和遗留问题*
近年来,对向非正规部门的小企业征税这一挑战的关注大大增加。然而,最近的大部分注意力仍然集中在收入最大化和政策设计等相对技术性的问题上。本文认为,这场辩论应越来越多地关注非正式部门税收对更广泛的发展影响,以及改善绩效的政治和体制障碍。在考虑将稀缺资源用于向小型非正规部门公司征税的优点时,辩论往往集中在有限的收入潜力、征收成本高以及对小型公司可能产生的不利影响上。相比之下,最近的争论越来越强调非正式税收在经济增长、税收合规和治理方面的更多间接好处。这些潜在的更广泛的好处在最近的研究中得到越来越多的支持,但它们取决于政府的支持,因此需要进一步关注。当我们把注意力从税务机关是否应该对小型非正规企业征税转向如何更有效地征税的挑战时,我们再次认为,需要一个更广泛的分析框架。大多数现有的研究都集中在发展较少扭曲的税收制度和简化税收,以减少遵守的成本。然而,这些战略虽然重要,但仍然过于狭隘。鼓励税务合规不仅需要降低成本,还需要加强正规化的潜在好处,从提高安全性到新的经济机会。同样重要的是,成功的改革需要政治领导人、税务管理者和纳税人的政治支持。这就要求更加注意通过战略政策、行政和体制改革来加强促进改革的政治动机。考虑到这一点,本文强调了一些最近寻求解决这些挑战的经验,但这些经验需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信