[Validation of an instrument to measure Exercise of Self Care Agency and its predictors].

H S So, E S Lee
{"title":"[Validation of an instrument to measure Exercise of Self Care Agency and its predictors].","authors":"H S So,&nbsp;E S Lee","doi":"10.4040/jnas.1989.19.3.273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this investigation was to delineate concepts contributing to the Exercise of Self-Care Agency (E.S.C.A.) Scale developed by Kearney & Fleischer (1979) and to test its construct validity and its predictors. The results are summarized as follows: 1. By means of principal factor analysis and maximal likelihood factor analysis upon data generated from 280 undergraduate students, the factors of Concern about Health Knowledge, Self-Concept, Information-Seeking Behavior, Decision-making and Responsibility, Self-esteem, and Passivity emerged. The total percent of variance explained by the 6 factors was 75.1%. 2. To assess factor independence and instrument homogeneity, correlations among the 6 factors were computed. The correlations ranged from .24 to .46 indicating that the factors and the items were not too similar or redundant. 3. Test-retest reliability of the total scale is r = .70. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for internal consistency of the total scale is .86 and that of the factors ranged from .750 to .661 (only factor 6 .497). 4. In additional analysis of the Exercise of Self-Care Agency Scale in relationship to Multiple Health Locus of Control, Family Environmental Scale, and Cornell Medical Index using stepwise multiple regression, the Internal Health Locus of Control Score predicted 21.8%(F = 53.34, P = .0001), Family Environmental Score 8.3%(F = 22.59, P = .0001), Modified Cornell Medical Index Score 5.4%(F = 15.74, P = .0001) of the score of the E.S.C.A.</p>","PeriodicalId":77565,"journal":{"name":"Kanho Hakhoe chi [The Journal of Nurses Academic Society]","volume":"19 3","pages":"273-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4040/jnas.1989.19.3.273","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kanho Hakhoe chi [The Journal of Nurses Academic Society]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4040/jnas.1989.19.3.273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The aim of this investigation was to delineate concepts contributing to the Exercise of Self-Care Agency (E.S.C.A.) Scale developed by Kearney & Fleischer (1979) and to test its construct validity and its predictors. The results are summarized as follows: 1. By means of principal factor analysis and maximal likelihood factor analysis upon data generated from 280 undergraduate students, the factors of Concern about Health Knowledge, Self-Concept, Information-Seeking Behavior, Decision-making and Responsibility, Self-esteem, and Passivity emerged. The total percent of variance explained by the 6 factors was 75.1%. 2. To assess factor independence and instrument homogeneity, correlations among the 6 factors were computed. The correlations ranged from .24 to .46 indicating that the factors and the items were not too similar or redundant. 3. Test-retest reliability of the total scale is r = .70. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for internal consistency of the total scale is .86 and that of the factors ranged from .750 to .661 (only factor 6 .497). 4. In additional analysis of the Exercise of Self-Care Agency Scale in relationship to Multiple Health Locus of Control, Family Environmental Scale, and Cornell Medical Index using stepwise multiple regression, the Internal Health Locus of Control Score predicted 21.8%(F = 53.34, P = .0001), Family Environmental Score 8.3%(F = 22.59, P = .0001), Modified Cornell Medical Index Score 5.4%(F = 15.74, P = .0001) of the score of the E.S.C.A.

[一种测量自我照顾能力的工具及其预测因子的验证]。
本研究的目的是描述有助于自我照顾能力行使的概念。由Kearney & Fleischer(1979)开发的量表,并测试其结构效度及其预测因子。研究结果总结如下:1。通过对280名大学生的数据进行主因子分析和最大似然因子分析,得出健康知识关注、自我概念、信息寻求行为、决策与责任、自尊和被动式因素。6个因素解释的总方差百分比为75.1%。2. 为了评估因素独立性和工具同质性,计算了6个因素之间的相关性。相关系数从0.24到0.46不等,表明因素和项目不太相似或冗余。3.总量表的重测信度r = 0.70。总量表内部一致性的Cronbach α系数为0.86,各因子的α系数范围为0.750 ~ 0.661(仅因子6.497)。4. 采用逐步多元回归分析自我照顾代理量表与多重健康控制点、家庭环境量表和康奈尔医疗指数的关系,内部健康控制点得分预测esca得分的21.8%(F = 53.34, P = 0.0001),家庭环境得分预测8.3%(F = 22.59, P = 0.0001),修正康奈尔医疗指数得分预测5.4%(F = 15.74, P = 0.0001)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信