Cases

Q4 Social Sciences

Environmental Law and Management Pub Date : 1999-07-08 DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0941(199905/06)11:3<69::AID-ELM141>3.0.CO;2-X

{"title":"Cases","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1099-0941(199905/06)11:3<69::AID-ELM141>3.0.CO;2-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Human Rights: Steel and others v UK (ECHR lays down limits to legitimate protest in environmental cases); Civil Liability: Baxter v Camden London Borough Council (ruling on noise); Ind v Plant Hire Co.(Stroud)Ltd (compensation for waste nuisance); Health and Safety: R v F Howe & Son (Engineers) Ltd (Court of Appeal criticises fines in health & safety cases as too low and sets new guidelines); Highways: Ramblers Association v Hoogstraten ; IPC/LAAPC: Compton and Gath Drums (important appeal decisions by the DETR on the content and procedure of authorisations); William Blythe & Co.(can low fines elsewhere be used as proportionality argument to reduce other fines?); Agency v Petrus Oils (case against a company collapses - Agency penalised in costs); Oakley v Birmingham City Council (profound implications of location of sanitary facilities); Forthcoming prosecution: HSE v Monsanto (Monsanto to be prosecuted for alleged breaches of rules relating to trials of genetically modified crops); Waste: Mayer Parry Recycling Ltd v The Environmental Agency (extended meaning given to the notion of 'waste' in the context of scrap metal); Customs and Excise v ICI Chemicals and Polymers (restricted meaning given to the notion of 'waste'in the context of certain site engineering activities); Customs and Excise v Taylor Woodrow (important exemption gained for removal of contaminated material).</p>","PeriodicalId":39650,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Law and Management","volume":"11 3","pages":"69-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Law and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-0941%28199905/06%2911%3A3%3C69%3A%3AAID-ELM141%3E3.0.CO%3B2-X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human Rights: Steel and others v UK (ECHR lays down limits to legitimate protest in environmental cases); Civil Liability: Baxter v Camden London Borough Council (ruling on noise); Ind v Plant Hire Co.(Stroud)Ltd (compensation for waste nuisance); Health and Safety: R v F Howe & Son (Engineers) Ltd (Court of Appeal criticises fines in health & safety cases as too low and sets new guidelines); Highways: Ramblers Association v Hoogstraten ; IPC/LAAPC: Compton and Gath Drums (important appeal decisions by the DETR on the content and procedure of authorisations); William Blythe & Co.(can low fines elsewhere be used as proportionality argument to reduce other fines?); Agency v Petrus Oils (case against a company collapses - Agency penalised in costs); Oakley v Birmingham City Council (profound implications of location of sanitary facilities); Forthcoming prosecution: HSE v Monsanto (Monsanto to be prosecuted for alleged breaches of rules relating to trials of genetically modified crops); Waste: Mayer Parry Recycling Ltd v The Environmental Agency (extended meaning given to the notion of 'waste' in the context of scrap metal); Customs and Excise v ICI Chemicals and Polymers (restricted meaning given to the notion of 'waste'in the context of certain site engineering activities); Customs and Excise v Taylor Woodrow (important exemption gained for removal of contaminated material).

查看原文本刊更多论文

情况下

人权:钢铁和其他人诉英国(欧洲人权法院规定了环境案件中合法抗议的限制);民事责任:巴克斯特诉卡姆登伦敦自治市议会(噪音裁决);Ind诉工厂租赁有限公司(斯特劳德)有限公司(废物滋扰补偿);健康与安全:R v F Howe & &;Son (Engineers) Ltd .(上诉法院批评卫生罚款);安全案例太低，并制定了新的指导方针);公路:漫游者协会诉Hoogstraten;IPC/LAAPC:康普顿和迦特鼓(DETR对授权内容和程序的重要上诉决定);威廉·布莱斯(其他地方的低罚款是否可以作为比例论点来减少其他罚款?);机构诉Petrus石油公司(公司倒闭案-机构罚款);Oakley诉伯明翰市议会(卫生设施位置的深刻影响);即将到来的起诉:HSE诉孟山都(孟山都因涉嫌违反有关转基因作物试验的规定而被起诉);废物:Mayer Parry Recycling Ltd诉The Environmental Agency(在废金属的背景下，“废物”概念的延伸含义);海关诉ICI化学品和聚合物(在某些现场工程活动的背景下，“废物”概念的限制含义);海关和海关诉泰勒·伍德罗(因移除受污染材料而获得的重要豁免)。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Environmental Law and Management Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The aim of Environmental Law & Management is to provide lawyers, and other concerned professionals such as environmental consultants and managers in commerce and industry, with a coverage of rapidly developing issues in Environmental Law that is both contemporaneous and authoritative, combining the approaches of reporting developments and ensuring they are analysed so that their implications may be assessed. The objectives which the journal seeks to pursue in this connection are to provide accurate and up to date reports of recent developments in case law, statute and policy, and to reinforce this with in-depth analysis in the form of both articles and shorter items.