Does Research Reduce Poverty? Assessing the Welfare Impacts of Policy-oriented Research in Agriculture

Edoardo Masset, Rajendra Mulmi, Andy Sumner
{"title":"Does Research Reduce Poverty? Assessing the Welfare Impacts of Policy-oriented Research in Agriculture","authors":"Edoardo Masset,&nbsp;Rajendra Mulmi,&nbsp;Andy Sumner","doi":"10.1111/j.2040-0209.2011.00360_2.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In the current context of the global financial crisis and its aftermath, development resources are likely to be getting scarcer. Resources for development research are too. The set of circumstances generating the resource scarcity is also putting pressure on development gains. More than ever before, every dollar spent on development research will have to count towards sustainable poverty reduction. However, the understanding of the impacts of development research on policy change and on poverty is weak at best, with agriculture being no different.</p>\n <p>The area of research impact is not a new area of enquiry but an emergent one. Our paper seeks to build on the work of others. It surveys the literature and identifies different ways of assessing the impact of ‘policy-oriented’ research. We then take the available literature on agriculture as a specific focus to survey.</p>\n <p>Our paper surveys the different types of ‘policy-oriented’ research; the literature on the ‘theories of change’ for policy research in international development; methodologies for analysing the impact of policy-oriented research; the relevant agriculture literature and outlines the types indicators that can be used for impact assessment of research with examples.</p>\n <p>The key findings are:</p>\n <p>\n \n </p><ul>\n \n <li><span>•  </span>\n \n \n <p>There is no standard practice for the evaluation of research projects and every evaluation strategy should be designed on a case-by-case basis.</p>\n </li>\n \n <li><span>•  </span>\n \n \n <p>It is possible to test research project impacts along some dimensions of social welfare (agricultural output, income or poverty) by finding the appropriate indicators (and methodology). The overall goal – welfare impacts of research – is highly desirable, but not always feasible.</p>\n </li>\n \n <li><span>•  </span>\n \n \n <p>When welfare assessment of research is not feasible, it is recommended that evaluators test intermediate outcomes. The articulation of the theory of change of the project allows testing critical links in the causal chain running from research to welfare.</p>\n </li>\n </ul>\n \n </div>","PeriodicalId":100618,"journal":{"name":"IDS Working Papers","volume":"2011 360","pages":"01-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2011.00360_2.x","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IDS Working Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2011.00360_2.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the current context of the global financial crisis and its aftermath, development resources are likely to be getting scarcer. Resources for development research are too. The set of circumstances generating the resource scarcity is also putting pressure on development gains. More than ever before, every dollar spent on development research will have to count towards sustainable poverty reduction. However, the understanding of the impacts of development research on policy change and on poverty is weak at best, with agriculture being no different.

The area of research impact is not a new area of enquiry but an emergent one. Our paper seeks to build on the work of others. It surveys the literature and identifies different ways of assessing the impact of ‘policy-oriented’ research. We then take the available literature on agriculture as a specific focus to survey.

Our paper surveys the different types of ‘policy-oriented’ research; the literature on the ‘theories of change’ for policy research in international development; methodologies for analysing the impact of policy-oriented research; the relevant agriculture literature and outlines the types indicators that can be used for impact assessment of research with examples.

The key findings are:

  • • 

    There is no standard practice for the evaluation of research projects and every evaluation strategy should be designed on a case-by-case basis.

  • • 

    It is possible to test research project impacts along some dimensions of social welfare (agricultural output, income or poverty) by finding the appropriate indicators (and methodology). The overall goal – welfare impacts of research – is highly desirable, but not always feasible.

  • • 

    When welfare assessment of research is not feasible, it is recommended that evaluators test intermediate outcomes. The articulation of the theory of change of the project allows testing critical links in the causal chain running from research to welfare.

研究能减少贫困吗?评估农业政策导向研究的福利影响
在当前全球金融危机及其后果的背景下,发展资源可能会越来越少。发展研究的资源也是如此。造成资源短缺的一系列情况也对发展成果造成压力。与以往任何时候相比,花在发展研究上的每一美元都必须用于可持续减贫。然而,对发展研究对政策变化和贫困的影响的理解充其量是薄弱的,农业也不例外。研究影响领域不是一个新的研究领域,而是一个新兴的领域。我们的论文试图以他人的工作为基础。它调查了文献并确定了评估“政策导向”研究影响的不同方法。然后,我们将现有的关于农业的文献作为具体的调查重点。本文综述了不同类型的“政策导向”研究;国际发展政策研究中的“变化理论”文献分析面向政策的研究的影响的方法;相关的农业文献和实例概述了可用于研究影响评估的类型指标。主要发现是:•没有评估研究项目的标准做法,每个评估策略都应该根据具体情况设计。•可以通过找到适当的指标(和方法)来测试研究项目对社会福利(农业产出、收入或贫困)的某些方面的影响。总体目标——研究对福利的影响——是非常可取的,但并不总是可行的。•当研究的福利评估不可行时,建议评估者测试中间结果。项目变化理论的表达允许测试从研究到福利的因果链中的关键环节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信