Influence of training on reliability of surgical knots

Thomas E.J Ind , Julia C Shelton , John H Shepherd
{"title":"Influence of training on reliability of surgical knots","authors":"Thomas E.J Ind ,&nbsp;Julia C Shelton ,&nbsp;John H Shepherd","doi":"10.1016/S0306-5456(01)00251-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Objectives</strong> To determine whether trainees in obstetrics and gynaecology tie adequate surgical knots and to assess whether formal training improves knot tying skills.</p><p><strong>Design</strong> A comparative study assessing surgical knots before and after tuition.</p><p><strong>Population</strong> Fourteen trainees in a single obstetrics and gynaecology department.</p><p><strong>Setting</strong> A basic surgical skills workshop based in a London teaching hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong> Trainees tied surgical knots around a 120mm jig using 2/0 glycan polymer. Each trainee tied 11 knots before and after a two and a half hour teaching session. Knots were tested using a mechanical testing machine.</p><p><strong>Outcome</strong> <strong>measures</strong> Knot strength (<em>N</em>); proportion of knots that were ‘secure’ (defined as those that eventually failed on the testing device by breakage rather than slippage); proportion of knots that were ‘dangerous’ (defined as those with a tensile strength of &lt; 5 <em>N</em>).</p><p><strong>Results</strong> After tuition, the median knot strength of the whole group was 5.7 <em>N</em> stronger than before instruction (95% CI 4.6–12.3 <em>N</em>). Prior to tuition 13.5% (20/148) knots tied had a tensile strength of &lt; 5 <em>N</em>. This was compared with 3.4% (5/148) after tuition (OR = 0.2, 95% CI 0.1–0.6). Before instruction 55.4% (82/148) of the knots were secure compared with 66.9% (99/148) after tuition (OR = 1.6, 95% CI 1.0–2.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusion</strong> Knot tying workshops can improve the ability of trainees in obstetrics and gynaecology to tie reef knots.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75620,"journal":{"name":"British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology","volume":"108 10","pages":"Pages 1013-1016"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0306-5456(01)00251-0","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306545601002510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives To determine whether trainees in obstetrics and gynaecology tie adequate surgical knots and to assess whether formal training improves knot tying skills.

Design A comparative study assessing surgical knots before and after tuition.

Population Fourteen trainees in a single obstetrics and gynaecology department.

Setting A basic surgical skills workshop based in a London teaching hospital.

Methods Trainees tied surgical knots around a 120mm jig using 2/0 glycan polymer. Each trainee tied 11 knots before and after a two and a half hour teaching session. Knots were tested using a mechanical testing machine.

Outcome measures Knot strength (N); proportion of knots that were ‘secure’ (defined as those that eventually failed on the testing device by breakage rather than slippage); proportion of knots that were ‘dangerous’ (defined as those with a tensile strength of < 5 N).

Results After tuition, the median knot strength of the whole group was 5.7 N stronger than before instruction (95% CI 4.6–12.3 N). Prior to tuition 13.5% (20/148) knots tied had a tensile strength of < 5 N. This was compared with 3.4% (5/148) after tuition (OR = 0.2, 95% CI 0.1–0.6). Before instruction 55.4% (82/148) of the knots were secure compared with 66.9% (99/148) after tuition (OR = 1.6, 95% CI 1.0–2.7).

Conclusion Knot tying workshops can improve the ability of trainees in obstetrics and gynaecology to tie reef knots.

训练对手术结可靠性的影响
目的了解妇产科受训者是否能正确打结,并评估正规培训是否能提高打结技能。设计一项比较研究,评估手术结前和后的教学。人口一个产科和妇科的14名实习生。背景:伦敦某教学医院的基础外科技能讲习班。方法学员使用2/0聚糖聚合物在120mm的夹具周围打结。在两个半小时的教学之前和之后,每个学员都打了11个结。用机械试验机对结进行测试。结强度(N);“安全”结的比例(定义为最终在测试设备上因断裂而不是滑移而失效的结);“危险”结的比例(定义为抗拉强度为<结果教学后,全组的中位结强度比教学前提高了5.7 N (95% CI 4.6-12.3 N)。教学前,13.5%(20/148)的结的抗拉强度为<这与学费后的3.4%(5/148)相比(OR = 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.6)。教学前55.4%(82/148)结牢固,教学后66.9%(99/148)结牢固(OR = 1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.7)。结论打结研修班能提高妇产科学员打礁结的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信