Factors influencing patient disposition after ambulatory herniorrhaphy

Q4 Nursing
Stavros G. Memtsoudis , Melanie C. Besculides , Cephas P. Swamidoss
{"title":"Factors influencing patient disposition after ambulatory herniorrhaphy","authors":"Stavros G. Memtsoudis ,&nbsp;Melanie C. Besculides ,&nbsp;Cephas P. Swamidoss","doi":"10.1016/j.ambsur.2005.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose:</h3><p>To determine factors associated with patient disposition status other than discharge to their customary residence (DCR) after elective, ambulatory inguinal hernia repair (IHR).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods:</h3><p><em>N</em> <!-->=<!--> <span>7953 patients who underwent IHR were identified in the National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery<span> (NSAS). Disposition status was examined by age, sex, race, type of anesthetic, anesthesia provider, expected source of payment, laterality of the procedure, facility type and US region. Logistic regression was used to examine independent risk factors for such disposition status.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><p>Independent risk factors for disposition status other than DCR included anesthesia type, anesthesia provider, increasing age of the patient, and bi- versus unilaterality of the procedure. Differences in disposition status were also found by facility type and US region in which the procedure was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion:</h3><p>The increased cost associated with a disposition status other than DCR requires identification of factors that independently contribute to such an outcome. In this study a number of anesthesia related and unrelated factors were identified that may impact on the disposition of patients undergoing ambulatory inguinal hernia repair. In light of limitations inherent to analysis of large databases our results should be interpreted with caution and prospective trials are needed for validation of our findings. The value of our results may lie particularly in the hypothesis generation for such trials.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38794,"journal":{"name":"Ambulatory Surgery","volume":"12 2","pages":"Pages 67-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ambsur.2005.06.004","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ambulatory Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966653205000375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose:

To determine factors associated with patient disposition status other than discharge to their customary residence (DCR) after elective, ambulatory inguinal hernia repair (IHR).

Materials and methods:

N = 7953 patients who underwent IHR were identified in the National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery (NSAS). Disposition status was examined by age, sex, race, type of anesthetic, anesthesia provider, expected source of payment, laterality of the procedure, facility type and US region. Logistic regression was used to examine independent risk factors for such disposition status.

Results:

Independent risk factors for disposition status other than DCR included anesthesia type, anesthesia provider, increasing age of the patient, and bi- versus unilaterality of the procedure. Differences in disposition status were also found by facility type and US region in which the procedure was performed.

Discussion:

The increased cost associated with a disposition status other than DCR requires identification of factors that independently contribute to such an outcome. In this study a number of anesthesia related and unrelated factors were identified that may impact on the disposition of patients undergoing ambulatory inguinal hernia repair. In light of limitations inherent to analysis of large databases our results should be interpreted with caution and prospective trials are needed for validation of our findings. The value of our results may lie particularly in the hypothesis generation for such trials.

影响门诊疝修补术后患者情绪的因素
目的:确定选择性、门诊腹股沟疝修补(IHR)后除出院到惯常住所(DCR)外与患者处置状态相关的因素。材料和方法:在全国门诊外科调查(NSAS)中确定了7953例接受IHR的患者。处置状态按年龄、性别、种族、麻醉类型、麻醉提供者、预期付款来源、手术的侧边性、设施类型和美国地区进行检查。采用Logistic回归方法检验这种处置状态的独立危险因素。结果:除DCR外,处理状态的独立危险因素包括麻醉类型、麻醉提供者、患者年龄的增加以及手术的双侧与单侧。处置状态的差异也被发现由设施类型和美国地区的程序进行。讨论:与处置状态相关的成本增加,而不是DCR,需要识别独立促成这种结果的因素。在这项研究中,一些麻醉相关的和不相关的因素被确定,可能会影响患者的处置接受门诊腹股沟疝修补。鉴于大型数据库分析固有的局限性,我们的结果应谨慎解释,并需要前瞻性试验来验证我们的发现。我们的结果的价值可能特别在于为这些试验生成假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ambulatory Surgery
Ambulatory Surgery Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信