Can obstetric complications explain the high levels of obstetric interventions and maternity service use among older women? A retrospective analysis of routinely collected data

Jacqueline S Bell, Doris M Campbell, Wendy J Graham, Gillian C Penney, Mandy Ryan, Marion H Hall
{"title":"Can obstetric complications explain the high levels of obstetric interventions and maternity service use among older women? A retrospective analysis of routinely collected data","authors":"Jacqueline S Bell,&nbsp;Doris M Campbell,&nbsp;Wendy J Graham,&nbsp;Gillian C Penney,&nbsp;Mandy Ryan,&nbsp;Marion H Hall","doi":"10.1016/S0306-5456(01)00214-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Objective</strong> To determine whether the higher levels of obstetric intervention and maternity service use among older women can be explained by obstetric complications.</p><p><strong>Design</strong> A retrospective analysis of routinely collected data from the Aberdeen Maternity and Neonatal Databank.</p><p><strong>Participants</strong> All residents of Aberdeen city district delivering singleton infants at the Maternity Hospital 1988-1997 (28,484 deliveries).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures</strong> Odds ratios for each intervention in older maternal age groups compared with women aged 20-29. Interventions considered include obstetric interventions (induction of labour, augmentation, epidural use, assisted delivery, caesarean section) and raised maternity service use (more than two prenatal scans, amniocentesis, antenatal admission to hospital, admission at delivery of more than five days, infant resuscitation, and admission to the neonatal unit).</p><p><strong>Methods</strong> Logistic regression was used to investigate the association between maternal age and the incidence of interventions. The odds ratios for each intervention were then adjusted for relevant obstetric complications and maternal socio-demographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results</strong> Levels of amniocentesis, caesarean section, assisted delivery, induction, and augmentation (in primiparae) are all higher among older women. Maternity service use also increases significantly with age: older women are more likely to have an antenatal admission, more than two scans, a hospital stay at delivery of more than five days, and have their baby admitted to a neonatal unit. Controlling for relevant obstetric complications reveals several examples of effect modification, but does not eliminate the age effect for most interventions in most groups of women.</p><p><strong>Conclusions</strong> Higher levels of intervention among older women are not explained by the obstetric complications we considered.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75620,"journal":{"name":"British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology","volume":"108 9","pages":"Pages 910-918"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0306-5456(01)00214-5","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306545601002145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To determine whether the higher levels of obstetric intervention and maternity service use among older women can be explained by obstetric complications.

Design A retrospective analysis of routinely collected data from the Aberdeen Maternity and Neonatal Databank.

Participants All residents of Aberdeen city district delivering singleton infants at the Maternity Hospital 1988-1997 (28,484 deliveries).

Main outcome measures Odds ratios for each intervention in older maternal age groups compared with women aged 20-29. Interventions considered include obstetric interventions (induction of labour, augmentation, epidural use, assisted delivery, caesarean section) and raised maternity service use (more than two prenatal scans, amniocentesis, antenatal admission to hospital, admission at delivery of more than five days, infant resuscitation, and admission to the neonatal unit).

Methods Logistic regression was used to investigate the association between maternal age and the incidence of interventions. The odds ratios for each intervention were then adjusted for relevant obstetric complications and maternal socio-demographic characteristics.

Results Levels of amniocentesis, caesarean section, assisted delivery, induction, and augmentation (in primiparae) are all higher among older women. Maternity service use also increases significantly with age: older women are more likely to have an antenatal admission, more than two scans, a hospital stay at delivery of more than five days, and have their baby admitted to a neonatal unit. Controlling for relevant obstetric complications reveals several examples of effect modification, but does not eliminate the age effect for most interventions in most groups of women.

Conclusions Higher levels of intervention among older women are not explained by the obstetric complications we considered.

产科并发症能否解释老年妇女中产科干预和产科服务使用率高的原因?对常规收集数据的回顾性分析
目的探讨老年妇女较高的产科干预和产科服务使用率是否可以用产科并发症来解释。设计回顾性分析从阿伯丁产妇和新生儿数据库常规收集的数据。参与者1988-1997年在妇产医院接生的所有阿伯丁城区居民(28,484例分娩)。主要结果测量:与20-29岁妇女相比,各干预措施在老年产妇年龄组中的优势比。考虑的干预措施包括产科干预措施(引产、增强术、硬膜外使用、助产、剖腹产)和提高产科服务的使用(两次以上产前扫描、羊膜穿刺术、产前住院、分娩5天以上住院、婴儿复苏和入住新生儿病房)。方法采用Logistic回归分析产妇年龄与干预措施发生率的关系。然后根据相关的产科并发症和产妇社会人口特征调整每种干预措施的优势比。结果老年妇女羊膜穿刺术、剖宫产术、助产术、引产术和隆胸术(初产妇)的水平均较高。产妇服务的使用也随着年龄的增长而显著增加:年龄较大的妇女更有可能接受产前检查,两次以上扫描,分娩时住院5天以上,并将婴儿送入新生儿病房。控制相关的产科并发症揭示了效果改变的几个例子,但并没有消除大多数妇女群体中大多数干预措施的年龄影响。结论:我们所考虑的产科并发症不能解释老年妇女干预水平较高的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信