Impacto pronóstico de la respuesta patológica completa y del estado ganglionar en pacientes con cáncer de mama avanzado tratadas con dosis alta de epirrubicina neoadyuvante

IF 0.2 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Gaceta Mexicana de Oncologia Pub Date : 2016-05-01 Epub Date: 2016-06-07 DOI:10.1016/j.gamo.2016.05.005
Nicolás Ramírez-Torres , Ancizar Pérez-Puentes , Rodolfo Rivas-Ruiz , Juan O. Talavera , Horacio Astudillo-de la Vega
{"title":"Impacto pronóstico de la respuesta patológica completa y del estado ganglionar en pacientes con cáncer de mama avanzado tratadas con dosis alta de epirrubicina neoadyuvante","authors":"Nicolás Ramírez-Torres ,&nbsp;Ancizar Pérez-Puentes ,&nbsp;Rodolfo Rivas-Ruiz ,&nbsp;Juan O. Talavera ,&nbsp;Horacio Astudillo-de la Vega","doi":"10.1016/j.gamo.2016.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The primary endpoint was to assess the pathological complete response (pCR) rate, and the secondary endpoint was to determine the survival of the patients with advanced breast cancer treated with high doses of neoadjuvant epirubicin, and for different treatment periods.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>The patients received FE<sub>100</sub>C (5-fluorouracil 500<!--> <!-->mg/m<sup>2</sup>, epirubicin 100<!--> <!-->mg/m<sup>2</sup>, cyclophosphamide 600<!--> <!-->mg/m<sup>2</sup>) in either 4 or 6 cycles.</p><p>A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the relationship of pCR with predictive factors. Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional hazard were performed. The groups were compared using log-rank test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study included 60 patients per group. A non-significant increase in the pCR rate (16.7%; <em>p</em>=.283) was observed after receiving 6 FE<sub>100</sub>C. The logistic regression analysis revealed that only clinical stage IIIA (OR, 11; <em>p</em>=.023) was more likely to achieve a pCR. The univariate analysis showed a statistically significant difference in favour of IIIA tumours (82%; <em>p</em>=.042), and negative axillary lymph nodes (96%; <em>p</em>=.000) in disease-free survival. In the multivariate analysis, the group with more than 4 positive lymph nodes (hazard ratio [HR], 19.6; <em>p</em>=.003) had the worst prognosis. The treatment effect was not significant for the pCR (HR, 3.9; <em>p</em>=.184), or the number of cycles given (HR, 1.3; <em>p</em> = .412) on disease free survival.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results show a slight increase in the effectiveness (pCR) with 6 FE<sub>100</sub>C, however there was no chance of improving the disease-free survival and the post-chemotherapy negative lymph node rates compared with a shorter treatment period.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":41581,"journal":{"name":"Gaceta Mexicana de Oncologia","volume":"15 3","pages":"Pages 128-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.gamo.2016.05.005","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gaceta Mexicana de Oncologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1665920116300281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/6/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective

The primary endpoint was to assess the pathological complete response (pCR) rate, and the secondary endpoint was to determine the survival of the patients with advanced breast cancer treated with high doses of neoadjuvant epirubicin, and for different treatment periods.

Patients and methods

The patients received FE100C (5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 100 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2) in either 4 or 6 cycles.

A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the relationship of pCR with predictive factors. Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional hazard were performed. The groups were compared using log-rank test.

Results

The study included 60 patients per group. A non-significant increase in the pCR rate (16.7%; p=.283) was observed after receiving 6 FE100C. The logistic regression analysis revealed that only clinical stage IIIA (OR, 11; p=.023) was more likely to achieve a pCR. The univariate analysis showed a statistically significant difference in favour of IIIA tumours (82%; p=.042), and negative axillary lymph nodes (96%; p=.000) in disease-free survival. In the multivariate analysis, the group with more than 4 positive lymph nodes (hazard ratio [HR], 19.6; p=.003) had the worst prognosis. The treatment effect was not significant for the pCR (HR, 3.9; p=.184), or the number of cycles given (HR, 1.3; p = .412) on disease free survival.

Conclusion

The results show a slight increase in the effectiveness (pCR) with 6 FE100C, however there was no chance of improving the disease-free survival and the post-chemotherapy negative lymph node rates compared with a shorter treatment period.

本研究的目的是评估在乳腺癌治疗中使用新佐剂埃鲁比霉素治疗的晚期乳腺癌患者的预后。
目的评估大剂量表柔比星治疗晚期乳腺癌患者的病理完全缓解率(pCR),以及不同治疗期患者的生存情况。患者和方法患者接受FE100C(5-氟尿嘧啶500 mg/m2,表柔比星100 mg/m2,环磷酰胺600 mg/m2)治疗,分4或6个周期。进行逻辑回归分析以确定pCR与预测因素的关系。进行Kaplan-Meier图和Cox比例风险分析。各组间比较采用log-rank检验。结果每组60例患者。pCR率无显著升高(16.7%;p=.283)。logistic回归分析显示,只有临床IIIA期(OR, 11;p= 0.023)更有可能实现pCR。单变量分析显示,支持IIIA肿瘤的差异有统计学意义(82%;P = 0.042),腋窝淋巴结阴性(96%;P =.000)。多因素分析中,淋巴结阳性≥4个组(风险比[HR], 19.6;P = 0.003)预后最差。治疗效果对pCR无显著影响(HR, 3.9;p=.184),或给出的周期数(HR, 1.3;P = .412)。结论与较短的治疗时间相比,6 FE100C治疗的有效性(pCR)略有提高,但无病生存期和化疗后淋巴结阴性率没有提高的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
255
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书