Reliability of Occupational Therapy Students Using the Figure-of-eight Technique of Measuring Hand Volume

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION
Mohammad Shaban Nadar , Dua'a Al-Kandari , Maqdad Taaqi
{"title":"Reliability of Occupational Therapy Students Using the Figure-of-eight Technique of Measuring Hand Volume","authors":"Mohammad Shaban Nadar ,&nbsp;Dua'a Al-Kandari ,&nbsp;Maqdad Taaqi","doi":"10.1016/j.hkjot.2013.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective/Background</h3><p>The figure-of-eight technique is a measure for hand volume that has been validated among experienced American clinicians and physical therapy students, but not among Middle Eastern occupational therapy students. The purpose of this study was to assess the intrarater and inter-rater reliability as well as concurrent validity of the figure-of-eight technique of measuring hand volume by 4th year (of a 5-year curriculum) occupational therapy students.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study used a cross-sectional design of a single group with three-level repeated measures of five raters. Twenty-three healthy students participated in this study. Five raters (4th year occupational therapy students) performed three separate blinded figure-of-eight measurements of hand volume for each hand. Two independent examiners performed one volumetric measurement for each hand using a water volumeter. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to examine the intrarater and inter-rater reliabilities of figure-of-eight measurements. Pearson product-moment correlations were used to establish concurrent validity relative to the volumeter which is the gold standard.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Intrarater reliability (ICC, 3<em>k</em>) ranged from .98 to .99 and the inter-rater reliability (ICC, 2<em>k</em>) was .99. The Pearson correlation coefficient for the concurrent validity was <em>r</em> = .929 (<em>p</em> &lt; .001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study demonstrated that five occupational therapy students in the 4th year of a 5-year curriculum were reliable raters for hand volume using the figure-of-eight technique, after being trained and tested for competency. The students can use the figure-of-eight technique for systematically assessing hand volume with confidence in their clinical fieldwork.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55049,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"23 1","pages":"Pages 20-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkjot.2013.04.001","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569186113000235","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective/Background

The figure-of-eight technique is a measure for hand volume that has been validated among experienced American clinicians and physical therapy students, but not among Middle Eastern occupational therapy students. The purpose of this study was to assess the intrarater and inter-rater reliability as well as concurrent validity of the figure-of-eight technique of measuring hand volume by 4th year (of a 5-year curriculum) occupational therapy students.

Methods

This study used a cross-sectional design of a single group with three-level repeated measures of five raters. Twenty-three healthy students participated in this study. Five raters (4th year occupational therapy students) performed three separate blinded figure-of-eight measurements of hand volume for each hand. Two independent examiners performed one volumetric measurement for each hand using a water volumeter. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to examine the intrarater and inter-rater reliabilities of figure-of-eight measurements. Pearson product-moment correlations were used to establish concurrent validity relative to the volumeter which is the gold standard.

Results

Intrarater reliability (ICC, 3k) ranged from .98 to .99 and the inter-rater reliability (ICC, 2k) was .99. The Pearson correlation coefficient for the concurrent validity was r = .929 (p < .001).

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that five occupational therapy students in the 4th year of a 5-year curriculum were reliable raters for hand volume using the figure-of-eight technique, after being trained and tested for competency. The students can use the figure-of-eight technique for systematically assessing hand volume with confidence in their clinical fieldwork.

职业治疗专业学生使用八字形测量手体积的信度
目的/背景8字形技术是一种测量手体积的方法,在经验丰富的美国临床医生和物理治疗专业的学生中得到了验证,但在中东职业治疗专业的学生中还没有得到验证。本研究的目的是评估四年级(五年制课程)职业治疗学生测量手体积的8字形技术的内部信度和内部信度以及并发效度。方法本研究采用单组横断面设计,采用5个评分者的3个水平重复测量。23名健康学生参加了本研究。五名评分者(四年级职业治疗专业的学生)对每只手的手体积进行了三次独立的盲法八字测量。两名独立检查员使用水容量计对每只手进行一次体积测量。用组内相关系数(ICC)检验8字形测量的组内和组间信度。使用皮尔逊积矩相关性来建立相对于体积计的并发效度,这是金标准。结果量表内信度(ICC, 3k)为0.98 ~ 0.99,量表间信度(ICC, 2k)为0.99。同时效度的Pearson相关系数为r = .929 (p <措施)。结论本研究表明,5名5年制职业治疗专业4年级学生经过训练和能力测试后,使用八字形技术对手体积进行了可靠的评分。学生可以使用八字形技术系统地评估手的体积有信心在他们的临床现场工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy is the official peer-reviewed open access publication of the Hong Kong Occupational Therapy Association. The Journal aims to promote the development of theory and practice in occupational therapy (OT), and facilitate documentation and communication among educators, researchers and practitioners. It also works to advance availability, use, support and excellence of OT and maintain professional standards to promote better understanding of OT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信