{"title":"Multidisciplinary compliance with guidelines for stroke assessment: Results of a nurse-led evaluation study","authors":"Sharon Hamilton , Susan McLaren , Anne Mulhall","doi":"10.1016/j.cein.2006.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate the use of a combined strategy (a nurse opinion-leader; evidence-based guidelines; a staff education programme and a new recording system) for the implementation of multidisciplinary stroke assessment in an acute hospital setting as measured by the compliance of different professional groups.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A quasi-experimental study design utilising a pre-test/post-test group.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Nine medical wards in a 600 bedded outer London Acute NHS Trust (without a stroke unit).</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>190 stroke patients (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->98 pre-test vs <em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->92 post-test).</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>Professional compliance with assessment guidelines documented in the new recording system.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Pre-test compliance with guidelines (<em>n</em>40) ranged from 0% to 100% and post-test ranged from 23–100%. Significant improvements (<em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->.05) in compliance were found in relation to 25 guidelines and a significant decline was documented in four others. Comparison of pre vs post-test values demonstrated variable changes in compliance with guidelines across professional groups: medical (range −64–+23%); nursing (range +2–+74%); physiotherapy (range −15–+69%); occupational therapy (range 0–+34%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The combined use of an opinion leader, guidelines, education and a recording system had a variable affect on compliance with guidelines; opinion-leadership appeared to have the most influence over compliance. The study design, and guideline specific features may have constrained changes in practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":87580,"journal":{"name":"Clinical effectiveness in nursing","volume":"9 ","pages":"Pages e57-e67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cein.2006.10.007","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical effectiveness in nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361900406000628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Objectives
To evaluate the use of a combined strategy (a nurse opinion-leader; evidence-based guidelines; a staff education programme and a new recording system) for the implementation of multidisciplinary stroke assessment in an acute hospital setting as measured by the compliance of different professional groups.
Design
A quasi-experimental study design utilising a pre-test/post-test group.
Setting
Nine medical wards in a 600 bedded outer London Acute NHS Trust (without a stroke unit).
Participants
190 stroke patients (n = 98 pre-test vs n = 92 post-test).
Main outcome measures
Professional compliance with assessment guidelines documented in the new recording system.
Results
Pre-test compliance with guidelines (n40) ranged from 0% to 100% and post-test ranged from 23–100%. Significant improvements (p < .05) in compliance were found in relation to 25 guidelines and a significant decline was documented in four others. Comparison of pre vs post-test values demonstrated variable changes in compliance with guidelines across professional groups: medical (range −64–+23%); nursing (range +2–+74%); physiotherapy (range −15–+69%); occupational therapy (range 0–+34%).
Conclusion
The combined use of an opinion leader, guidelines, education and a recording system had a variable affect on compliance with guidelines; opinion-leadership appeared to have the most influence over compliance. The study design, and guideline specific features may have constrained changes in practice.