Constructing tests to compare two proportions whose critical regions guarantee to be Barnard convex sets

Q Mathematics
Félix Almendra-Arao , José Juan Castro-Alva , Hortensia Reyes-Cervantes
{"title":"Constructing tests to compare two proportions whose critical regions guarantee to be Barnard convex sets","authors":"Félix Almendra-Arao ,&nbsp;José Juan Castro-Alva ,&nbsp;Hortensia Reyes-Cervantes","doi":"10.1016/j.stamet.2016.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In both statistical non-inferiority (NI) and superiority (S) tests, the critical region must be a Barnard convex set<span> for two main reasons. One, being computational in nature, based on the fact that calculating test sizes is a computationally intensive problem due to the presence of a nuisance parameter<span>. However, this calculation is considerably reduced when the critical region is a Barnard convex set. The other reason is that in order for the NI/S statistical tests to make sense, its critical regions must be Barnard convex sets. While it is indeed possible for NI/S tests’ critical regions to not be Barnard convex sets, for the reasons stated above, it is desirable that they are. Therefore, it is important to generate, from a given NI/S test, a test which guarantees that the critical regions are Barnard convex sets. We propose a method by which, from a given NI/S test, we construct another NI/S test, ensuring that the critical regions corresponding to the modified test are Barnard convex sets, we illustrate this through examples. This work is theoretical because the type of developments refers to the general framework of NI/S testing for two independent binomial proportions and it is applied because statistical tests that do not ensure that their critical regions are Barnard convex sets may appear in practice, particularly in the clinical trials area.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48877,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Methodology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.stamet.2016.08.005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1572312716300272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In both statistical non-inferiority (NI) and superiority (S) tests, the critical region must be a Barnard convex set for two main reasons. One, being computational in nature, based on the fact that calculating test sizes is a computationally intensive problem due to the presence of a nuisance parameter. However, this calculation is considerably reduced when the critical region is a Barnard convex set. The other reason is that in order for the NI/S statistical tests to make sense, its critical regions must be Barnard convex sets. While it is indeed possible for NI/S tests’ critical regions to not be Barnard convex sets, for the reasons stated above, it is desirable that they are. Therefore, it is important to generate, from a given NI/S test, a test which guarantees that the critical regions are Barnard convex sets. We propose a method by which, from a given NI/S test, we construct another NI/S test, ensuring that the critical regions corresponding to the modified test are Barnard convex sets, we illustrate this through examples. This work is theoretical because the type of developments refers to the general framework of NI/S testing for two independent binomial proportions and it is applied because statistical tests that do not ensure that their critical regions are Barnard convex sets may appear in practice, particularly in the clinical trials area.

构造检验来比较临界区域保证为Barnard凸集的两个比例
在统计非劣效性(NI)和优越性(S)检验中,关键区域必须是Barnard凸集,主要有两个原因。其一,本质上是计算性的,基于这样一个事实,即计算测试大小是一个计算密集的问题,因为存在一个讨厌的参数。然而,当临界区域是Barnard凸集时,这种计算大大减少。另一个原因是,为了使NI/S统计检验有意义,它的临界区域必须是Barnard凸集。虽然NI/S测试的关键区域确实有可能不是Barnard凸集,但由于上述原因,它们是可取的。因此,从给定的NI/S测试中生成一个保证关键区域是Barnard凸集的测试是很重要的。我们提出了一种方法,通过该方法,我们从给定的NI/S测试中构造另一个NI/S测试,确保修改后的测试对应的临界区域是Barnard凸集,我们通过实例说明了这一点。这项工作是理论性的,因为发展类型涉及两个独立二项比例的NI/S测试的一般框架,它被应用是因为不确保其关键区域是巴纳德凸集的统计测试可能出现在实践中,特别是在临床试验领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Statistical Methodology
Statistical Methodology STATISTICS & PROBABILITY-
CiteScore
0.59
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Statistical Methodology aims to publish articles of high quality reflecting the varied facets of contemporary statistical theory as well as of significant applications. In addition to helping to stimulate research, the journal intends to bring about interactions among statisticians and scientists in other disciplines broadly interested in statistical methodology. The journal focuses on traditional areas such as statistical inference, multivariate analysis, design of experiments, sampling theory, regression analysis, re-sampling methods, time series, nonparametric statistics, etc., and also gives special emphasis to established as well as emerging applied areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信