Legionellosis

PhD Jason D. Bannan
{"title":"Legionellosis","authors":"PhD Jason D. Bannan","doi":"10.1016/S1069-417X(00)80033-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Legionellosis is a respiratory tract infection with considerable morbidity and mortality that is being recognized more commonly as an important cause of community-acquired pneumonia as well as nosocomial pneumonia. As with all severe respiratory infections, an aggressive diagnostic approach is warranted for legionellosis. Clearly the most rapid diagnostic measures available should be employed in the diagnosis of these infections. However, rapidity is of no value with tests that are low in specificity and may provide ambiguous results. The standards in <em>Legionella</em> diagnosis are culture, DFA, and urinary antigen tests. The methods have been improved, but the principals have remained the same for the past two decades. Culture and antigen testing are highly specific, while DFA and urine antigen testing provide rapid results. Newer rapid tests emploring genetic detection are being developed, and will be increasingly incorporated by clinical microbiologists. Therapy, however, should not be dictated by the results of the diagnostic efforts as a delay in instituting appropriate therapy for legionellosis significantly increases the morbidity and mortality of this disease. Accordingly, empirical therapy for <em>Legionella</em> spp. should be included in the treatment of severe community-acquired pneumonia. Although intravenous erythromycin has historically been the drug of choice, newer macrolides such as azithromycin as well as fluoroquinolones have superior in vitro activity, greater intracellular and pulmonary tissue penetration, and are available in intravenous form. Parenteral therapy should be given until there is a clear clinical response. Rifampin is also highly active against <em>Legionella</em> spp. and may be combined with a newer macrolide or a fluoroquinolone in cases of severe illness. Therapy can be switched to oral dosing after a clinical response and should be continued for three weeks in immunocompromised patients, two weeks in others.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100102,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobics and Infectious Diseases Newsletter","volume":"16 10","pages":"Pages 73-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1069-417X(00)80033-3","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobics and Infectious Diseases Newsletter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1069417X00800333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Legionellosis is a respiratory tract infection with considerable morbidity and mortality that is being recognized more commonly as an important cause of community-acquired pneumonia as well as nosocomial pneumonia. As with all severe respiratory infections, an aggressive diagnostic approach is warranted for legionellosis. Clearly the most rapid diagnostic measures available should be employed in the diagnosis of these infections. However, rapidity is of no value with tests that are low in specificity and may provide ambiguous results. The standards in Legionella diagnosis are culture, DFA, and urinary antigen tests. The methods have been improved, but the principals have remained the same for the past two decades. Culture and antigen testing are highly specific, while DFA and urine antigen testing provide rapid results. Newer rapid tests emploring genetic detection are being developed, and will be increasingly incorporated by clinical microbiologists. Therapy, however, should not be dictated by the results of the diagnostic efforts as a delay in instituting appropriate therapy for legionellosis significantly increases the morbidity and mortality of this disease. Accordingly, empirical therapy for Legionella spp. should be included in the treatment of severe community-acquired pneumonia. Although intravenous erythromycin has historically been the drug of choice, newer macrolides such as azithromycin as well as fluoroquinolones have superior in vitro activity, greater intracellular and pulmonary tissue penetration, and are available in intravenous form. Parenteral therapy should be given until there is a clear clinical response. Rifampin is also highly active against Legionella spp. and may be combined with a newer macrolide or a fluoroquinolone in cases of severe illness. Therapy can be switched to oral dosing after a clinical response and should be continued for three weeks in immunocompromised patients, two weeks in others.

军团菌病
军团菌病是一种发病率和死亡率相当高的呼吸道感染,目前被普遍认为是社区获得性肺炎和医院获得性肺炎的重要原因。与所有严重呼吸道感染一样,军团菌病需要积极的诊断方法。显然,在诊断这些感染时应采用现有的最快速诊断措施。然而,对于特异性低且可能提供模糊结果的测试,快速是没有价值的。军团菌的诊断标准是培养、DFA和尿抗原检测。虽然方法有所改进,但在过去的二十年里,原则一直保持不变。培养和抗原检测具有高度特异性,而DFA和尿抗原检测可提供快速结果。正在开发利用基因检测的较新的快速检测方法,临床微生物学家将越来越多地采用这些方法。然而,治疗不应由诊断工作的结果决定,因为对军团菌病实施适当治疗的延误会大大增加这种疾病的发病率和死亡率。因此,应将军团菌的经验性治疗纳入重症社区获得性肺炎的治疗。虽然静脉注射红霉素历来是首选药物,但较新的大环内酯类药物,如阿奇霉素和氟喹诺酮类药物具有更好的体外活性,更大的细胞内和肺组织穿透性,并且可以静脉注射。应给予肠外治疗,直到有明确的临床反应。利福平对军团菌也非常有效,在病情严重的情况下可与较新的大环内酯类药物或氟喹诺酮类药物联合使用。在出现临床反应后,治疗可转为口服给药,免疫功能低下患者应持续三周,其他患者应持续两周。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信