Expedited communication of CT findings for acute stroke using a HIPAA-compliant messaging system

Carlos J. Sanchez , Andres Su , Camara Sharperson , Adam B. Prater , John J. O'Keefe , Matthew E. Zygmont , Raul G. Nogueira , Michael R. Frankel , Jason W. Allen , Ryan B. Peterson
{"title":"Expedited communication of CT findings for acute stroke using a HIPAA-compliant messaging system","authors":"Carlos J. Sanchez ,&nbsp;Andres Su ,&nbsp;Camara Sharperson ,&nbsp;Adam B. Prater ,&nbsp;John J. O'Keefe ,&nbsp;Matthew E. Zygmont ,&nbsp;Raul G. Nogueira ,&nbsp;Michael R. Frankel ,&nbsp;Jason W. Allen ,&nbsp;Ryan B. Peterson","doi":"10.1016/j.neuri.2022.100058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Effective communication of radiologic findings is crucial in the acute evaluation of stroke. Conventional methods (CM) of communication can present challenges leading to delays in reporting, ultimately impacting patient outcomes. The goal of this retrospective study was to assess the utility of a HIPAA-compliant messaging system (MS) for expediting communication of CT findings by radiologists to members of the stroke team.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Multimodal stroke protocol CT examinations performed at a high-volume stroke center between January and December 2019 were identified as part of this IRB-approved retrospective study. Read-back times were determined based on templated documentation within individual radiologic reports. The time interval between identification of findings and notification was calculated for each report, and usage of CM versus MS was documented. In addition, an online voluntary survey was disseminated to staff to assess user satisfaction with the MS.</p></div><div><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><p>In total, 442 CTs were included, and 126 (29%) documented use of the MS. The MS was associated with significant reductions in median read-back times, both for all reported findings (1.5 versus 16 minutes, p&lt;0.01) and for critical findings (3 versus 15 minutes, p&lt;0.01). The majority of MS users (48/57, 84%) felt that it was an effective method of communication beneficial to patient care. Use of the MS was associated with a significant decrease in read-back times and was well accepted as a mode of communicating CT findings between radiologists and interdisciplinary members of the stroke team.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74295,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience informatics","volume":"2 2","pages":"Article 100058"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772528622000206/pdfft?md5=e97fb65e17ac5fc15cbbb2e706214cb8&pid=1-s2.0-S2772528622000206-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772528622000206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose

Effective communication of radiologic findings is crucial in the acute evaluation of stroke. Conventional methods (CM) of communication can present challenges leading to delays in reporting, ultimately impacting patient outcomes. The goal of this retrospective study was to assess the utility of a HIPAA-compliant messaging system (MS) for expediting communication of CT findings by radiologists to members of the stroke team.

Materials and methods

Multimodal stroke protocol CT examinations performed at a high-volume stroke center between January and December 2019 were identified as part of this IRB-approved retrospective study. Read-back times were determined based on templated documentation within individual radiologic reports. The time interval between identification of findings and notification was calculated for each report, and usage of CM versus MS was documented. In addition, an online voluntary survey was disseminated to staff to assess user satisfaction with the MS.

Results and conclusions

In total, 442 CTs were included, and 126 (29%) documented use of the MS. The MS was associated with significant reductions in median read-back times, both for all reported findings (1.5 versus 16 minutes, p<0.01) and for critical findings (3 versus 15 minutes, p<0.01). The majority of MS users (48/57, 84%) felt that it was an effective method of communication beneficial to patient care. Use of the MS was associated with a significant decrease in read-back times and was well accepted as a mode of communicating CT findings between radiologists and interdisciplinary members of the stroke team.

Abstract Image

使用符合hipaa的信息传递系统加速急性脑卒中CT结果的沟通
背景和目的在脑卒中的急性评估中,有效的影像学表现交流是至关重要的。传统的沟通方法(CM)可能会带来挑战,导致报告延迟,最终影响患者的治疗结果。本回顾性研究的目的是评估符合hipaa的信息传递系统(MS)在加速放射科医生与卒中团队成员沟通CT发现方面的效用。材料和方法2019年1月至12月在高容量卒中中心进行的多模式卒中CT检查被确定为irb批准的回顾性研究的一部分。根据单个放射学报告中的模板文件确定回读时间。计算每个报告的发现和通知之间的时间间隔,并记录CM与MS的使用情况。此外,还向员工分发了一项在线自愿调查,以评估用户对MS的满意度。结果和结论:总共纳入了442个ct, 126个(29%)记录了MS的使用情况。MS与中位读回时间的显著减少有关,无论是对所有报告的发现(1.5分钟对16分钟,p<0.01)还是对关键发现(3分钟对15分钟,p<0.01)。大多数MS用户(48/57,84%)认为这是一种有利于患者护理的有效沟通方法。使用MS可显著减少回读时间,并被广泛接受为放射科医生和卒中团队跨学科成员之间沟通CT结果的一种模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroscience informatics
Neuroscience informatics Surgery, Radiology and Imaging, Information Systems, Neurology, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Signal Processing, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Health Informatics, Clinical Neurology, Pathology and Medical Technology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信