Intrathecal cervical analgesia for cancer pain: a 12-year follow-up study in a comprehensive cancer center.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Denis Dupoiron, Florent Bienfait, Gabriel Carvajal, Valerie Seegers, Thomas Douillard, Sabrina Jubier-Hamon, Thierry Delorme, Arthur Julienne, Yves Marie Pluchon, Nicolas Ribault, Edmond Nader, Nathalie Lebrec
{"title":"Intrathecal cervical analgesia for cancer pain: a 12-year follow-up study in a comprehensive cancer center.","authors":"Denis Dupoiron, Florent Bienfait, Gabriel Carvajal, Valerie Seegers, Thomas Douillard, Sabrina Jubier-Hamon, Thierry Delorme, Arthur Julienne, Yves Marie Pluchon, Nicolas Ribault, Edmond Nader, Nathalie Lebrec","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2023-104961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intrathecal analgesia plays a key role for patients suffering refractory cancer pain. Nevertheless, intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS), requiring a cervical catheter tip implantation, have been poorly described in medical literature.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>A monocentric retrospective follow-up study was designed to evaluate results of cervical IDDS for cancer pain.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>From January 2010 to December 2022, all intrathecal-treated patients were prescribed a combined intrathecal analgesics regimen through a catheter placed in the cervical vertebral canal. Post-implant assessment of pain was determined using a numeric rating scale (NRS). Patients were followed via day-hospital visits and telephone calls at least monthly. Pain scores were compared using the Wilcoxon's signed rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-eight patients were included in this study; all received intrathecal treatments. Implanted patients suffered from severe pain (mean presurgical maximum numerical rating score 8.02±0.24 despite a mean 562.56±127.72 mg of oral morphine equivalent daily dose). Mean survival time after intrathecal treatment start was 208.48±67 days. Intrathecal drug delivery systems provided pain relief compared with initial pain score with a significant statistical difference after 1 week, 1 month, 2 and 3 months (p<0.01). A 50% reduction in initial pain level was achieved in 93% of cases during the first week of intrathecal implant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggest that long-term intrathecal treatment using a multidrug regimen for cancer-related pain through cervical intrathecal catheters was suitable and safe in our study population. We demonstrated a clinically and statistically significant pain reduction in patients using mainly a percutaneous lumbar approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"757-763"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2023-104961","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intrathecal analgesia plays a key role for patients suffering refractory cancer pain. Nevertheless, intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS), requiring a cervical catheter tip implantation, have been poorly described in medical literature.

Aims: A monocentric retrospective follow-up study was designed to evaluate results of cervical IDDS for cancer pain.

Patients and methods: From January 2010 to December 2022, all intrathecal-treated patients were prescribed a combined intrathecal analgesics regimen through a catheter placed in the cervical vertebral canal. Post-implant assessment of pain was determined using a numeric rating scale (NRS). Patients were followed via day-hospital visits and telephone calls at least monthly. Pain scores were compared using the Wilcoxon's signed rank test.

Results: Ninety-eight patients were included in this study; all received intrathecal treatments. Implanted patients suffered from severe pain (mean presurgical maximum numerical rating score 8.02±0.24 despite a mean 562.56±127.72 mg of oral morphine equivalent daily dose). Mean survival time after intrathecal treatment start was 208.48±67 days. Intrathecal drug delivery systems provided pain relief compared with initial pain score with a significant statistical difference after 1 week, 1 month, 2 and 3 months (p<0.01). A 50% reduction in initial pain level was achieved in 93% of cases during the first week of intrathecal implant.

Conclusions: Results suggest that long-term intrathecal treatment using a multidrug regimen for cancer-related pain through cervical intrathecal catheters was suitable and safe in our study population. We demonstrated a clinically and statistically significant pain reduction in patients using mainly a percutaneous lumbar approach.

鞘内宫颈镇痛治疗癌痛:一项综合性癌症中心的12年随访研究。
背景:鞘内镇痛在难治性癌性疼痛患者中起着关键作用。然而,鞘内给药系统(IDDS)需要宫颈导管尖端植入,在医学文献中很少有描述。目的:一项单中心回顾性随访研究旨在评估宫颈癌IDDS治疗癌性疼痛的结果。患者和方法:2010年1月至2022年12月,所有鞘内治疗的患者通过椎管置管给予鞘内联合镇痛方案。植入后疼痛评估采用数字评定量表(NRS)确定。患者通过每日医院访问和至少每月电话随访。疼痛评分采用Wilcoxon's sign rank检验进行比较。结果:本研究纳入98例患者;所有患者均接受鞘内治疗。植入患者疼痛严重(平均术前最高数值评分为8.02±0.24,而口服吗啡当量日平均剂量为562.56±127.72 mg)。鞘内治疗开始后的平均生存时间为208.48±67天。与初始疼痛评分相比,鞘内给药系统在1周、1个月、2个月和3个月后提供了疼痛缓解,差异有统计学意义(p)结论:结果表明,在我们的研究人群中,通过宫颈鞘内导管使用多药物方案长期治疗癌性疼痛是合适和安全的。我们证明了主要采用经皮腰椎入路的患者的临床和统计学意义显著的疼痛减轻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信