The Seated Trunk Control Test: Investigation of Reliability and Known-Groups Validity Using Individuals Post-Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2023-11-17 Print Date: 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1123/jsr.2022-0460
Travis R Pollen, Chelsey Roe, Darren L Johnson, Sheri P Silfies, Brian Noehren
{"title":"The Seated Trunk Control Test: Investigation of Reliability and Known-Groups Validity Using Individuals Post-Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.","authors":"Travis R Pollen, Chelsey Roe, Darren L Johnson, Sheri P Silfies, Brian Noehren","doi":"10.1123/jsr.2022-0460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Decreased trunk neuromuscular control is a risk factor for both upper- and lower-extremity injuries, yet there are few reliable and valid clinical tests to identify deficits.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and known-groups validity of a novel clinical test, the seated trunk control test (STCT).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional reliability and known-groups validity study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Laboratory.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>89 unique participants: 34 were 3 months postoperative anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and 55 healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For the STCT, participants sat on a balance board with their eyes closed for three 30-second trials while investigators counted balance errors. Intraclass correlations (ICCs) were used to assess interrater reliability (N = 20) and test-retest reliability (N = 40). To assess known-groups validity, independent t tests were used to compare STCT errors at 3 months post-ACLR with healthy matched controls (N = 34/group). Area under a receiver operating characteristic curve identified an optimal cutoff for distinguishing between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The STCT had perfect interrater reliability (ICC2,3 = 1.00) and good test-retest reliability (ICC3,3 = .79; 95% confidence interval = .61-.89). The ACLR group made significantly more errors on the STCT (mean [SD] = 15.5 [5.4]) than controls (mean [SD] = 8.2 [4.1]; P < .001, Cohen d = 1.52). The STCT's ability to distinguish between groups was excellent (area under a ROC curve = 0.86). A cutoff of 12 errors maximized sensitivity (76%) and specificity (85%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The STCT is reliable between raters and across days. It also has excellent ability to distinguish between individuals with a recent ACLR and healthy matched controls, which provides initial evidence to suggest that the STCT may be clinically useful for identifying deficits in trunk neuromuscular control.</p>","PeriodicalId":50041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2022-0460","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Decreased trunk neuromuscular control is a risk factor for both upper- and lower-extremity injuries, yet there are few reliable and valid clinical tests to identify deficits.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and known-groups validity of a novel clinical test, the seated trunk control test (STCT).

Design: Cross-sectional reliability and known-groups validity study.

Setting: Laboratory.

Participants: 89 unique participants: 34 were 3 months postoperative anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and 55 healthy controls.

Methods: For the STCT, participants sat on a balance board with their eyes closed for three 30-second trials while investigators counted balance errors. Intraclass correlations (ICCs) were used to assess interrater reliability (N = 20) and test-retest reliability (N = 40). To assess known-groups validity, independent t tests were used to compare STCT errors at 3 months post-ACLR with healthy matched controls (N = 34/group). Area under a receiver operating characteristic curve identified an optimal cutoff for distinguishing between groups.

Results: The STCT had perfect interrater reliability (ICC2,3 = 1.00) and good test-retest reliability (ICC3,3 = .79; 95% confidence interval = .61-.89). The ACLR group made significantly more errors on the STCT (mean [SD] = 15.5 [5.4]) than controls (mean [SD] = 8.2 [4.1]; P < .001, Cohen d = 1.52). The STCT's ability to distinguish between groups was excellent (area under a ROC curve = 0.86). A cutoff of 12 errors maximized sensitivity (76%) and specificity (85%).

Conclusions: The STCT is reliable between raters and across days. It also has excellent ability to distinguish between individuals with a recent ACLR and healthy matched controls, which provides initial evidence to suggest that the STCT may be clinically useful for identifying deficits in trunk neuromuscular control.

坐式躯干对照试验:对个体前交叉韧带重建后的信度和已知组效度的调查。
背景:躯干神经肌肉控制减少是上肢和下肢损伤的一个危险因素,但很少有可靠和有效的临床试验来识别缺陷。目的:本研究的目的是确定一种新型临床试验的信度和已知组效度,即坐式躯干对照试验(STCT)。设计:横断面信度和已知组效度研究。设置:实验室。参与者:89名独特参与者:34名术后3个月前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)和55名健康对照。方法:对于STCT,参与者闭着眼睛坐在平衡板上进行三次30秒的试验,同时研究人员计算平衡误差。用类内相关性(ICCs)评估组间信度(N = 20)和重测信度(N = 40)。为了评估已知组的有效性,采用独立t检验比较aclr后3个月的STCT误差与健康匹配对照(N = 34/组)。在接收者工作特征曲线下的面积确定了区分组的最佳截止。结果:STCT具有较好的量表间信度(ICC2,3 = 1.00)和较好的重测信度(ICC3,3 = 0.79;95%置信区间= 0.61 - 0.89)。ACLR组STCT误差显著高于对照组(平均[SD] = 15.5[5.4])(平均[SD] = 8.2 [4.1]);P < 0.001, Cohen d = 1.52)。STCT区分组间的能力很好(ROC曲线下面积= 0.86)。12个错误的截止值使灵敏度(76%)和特异性(85%)最大化。结论:STCT在评分者之间和跨天是可靠的。STCT还具有区分近期ACLR患者和健康对照者的出色能力,这提供了初步证据,表明STCT可能在临床上用于识别躯干神经肌肉控制缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
143
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sport Rehabilitation (JSR) is your source for the latest peer-reviewed research in the field of sport rehabilitation. All members of the sports-medicine team will benefit from the wealth of important information in each issue. JSR is completely devoted to the rehabilitation of sport and exercise injuries, regardless of the age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status of the participant. JSR publishes peer-reviewed original research, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, critically appraised topics (CATs), case studies/series, and technical reports that directly affect the management and rehabilitation of injuries incurred during sport-related activities, irrespective of the individual’s age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status. The journal is intended to provide an international, multidisciplinary forum to serve the needs of all members of the sports medicine team, including athletic trainers/therapists, sport physical therapists/physiotherapists, sports medicine physicians, and other health care and medical professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信