{"title":"Diagnostic performance between RT-PCR and chest CT in outpatients with clinically suspected COVID-19","authors":"Elif TÜKENMEZ TİGEN, Buket ERTURK SENGEL, Canan CİMSİT, Hande PERK GURUN, Çiğdem APAYDIN KAYA, Volkan KORTEN","doi":"10.5472/marumj.1379916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To investigate the diagnostic performance between chest computed tomography (CT) and reverse transcription-polymerase
 chain reaction (RT-PCR) in outpatients with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
 Patients and Methods: Between March and June 2020, a total of 812 patients with clinically suspected COVID-19 who underwent both
 chest CT and initial-single RT-PCR on admission to outpatient units were retrospectively enrolled. CT severity-score (CT-SS) was
 calculated and data were matched with PCR results.
 Results: Of 812 patients, 54% (439/812) had positive RT-PCR results, and 47% (425/812) had a positive chest CT scan. With RT-PCR
 results as reference, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy of chest CT in defining COVID-19 infection were 60%, (95% CI 56-65%,
 265/439 patients), 57% (95% CI 52-62%, 213/373), 59% (95% CI 55-62%, 478/812), respectively. Three hundred eighty-seven (47%)
 patients had no CT findings, 380/812 (46.8%) had mild, 45/812 (5.5%) had moderate, and no patients in the severe group
 Conclusion: Chest CT did not show high sensitivity for the diagnosis of COVID-19 for outpatients. We suggest RT-PCR should be
 the primary diagnostic tool. Chest CT might be considered if there is a strong clinical suspicion with repeatedly negative RT-PCR test
 results, ensuring infection prevention and control measures can be preserved.","PeriodicalId":43341,"journal":{"name":"Marmara Medical Journal","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marmara Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5472/marumj.1379916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the diagnostic performance between chest computed tomography (CT) and reverse transcription-polymerase
chain reaction (RT-PCR) in outpatients with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Patients and Methods: Between March and June 2020, a total of 812 patients with clinically suspected COVID-19 who underwent both
chest CT and initial-single RT-PCR on admission to outpatient units were retrospectively enrolled. CT severity-score (CT-SS) was
calculated and data were matched with PCR results.
Results: Of 812 patients, 54% (439/812) had positive RT-PCR results, and 47% (425/812) had a positive chest CT scan. With RT-PCR
results as reference, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy of chest CT in defining COVID-19 infection were 60%, (95% CI 56-65%,
265/439 patients), 57% (95% CI 52-62%, 213/373), 59% (95% CI 55-62%, 478/812), respectively. Three hundred eighty-seven (47%)
patients had no CT findings, 380/812 (46.8%) had mild, 45/812 (5.5%) had moderate, and no patients in the severe group
Conclusion: Chest CT did not show high sensitivity for the diagnosis of COVID-19 for outpatients. We suggest RT-PCR should be
the primary diagnostic tool. Chest CT might be considered if there is a strong clinical suspicion with repeatedly negative RT-PCR test
results, ensuring infection prevention and control measures can be preserved.
期刊介绍:
Marmara Medical Journal, Marmara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi tarafından yılda üç kere yayımlanan multidisipliner bir dergidir. Bu dergide tıbbın tüm alanlarına ait orijinal araştırma makaleleri, olgu sunumları ve derlemeler İngilizce veya Türkçe olarak yer alır.