Thinking Process of Junior High School Students in Solving Mathematics Problems Based on Emotional Quotient

Rafika Kamila Sari, Endah Budi Rahaju
{"title":"Thinking Process of Junior High School Students in Solving Mathematics Problems Based on Emotional Quotient","authors":"Rafika Kamila Sari, Endah Budi Rahaju","doi":"10.26740/mathedunesa.v12n2.p635-651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thinking process is a series of cognitive processes that occur in someone’s mental and mind including the stages of remembering, considering, making arguments, and making decisions. Differences in students' thinking processes in solving math problems can be influenced by emotional quotient. This study uses three stages of the thinking process which include (1) Forming understanding, (2) Forming opinions, and (3) Forming conclusions. The aim of this study is to describe the thinking processes of junior high school students with high and low emotional quotient in solving problems of flat side of space. This study is a qualitative descriptive study. The instruments used were the Emotional Quotient Questionnaire, Mathematical Ability Test, Problem Solving Test, and interview guides. This study was conducted on class VIII students of junior high school with the subject of one high emotional quotient student and one low emotional quotient student. The results of this study indicate that in the stage of understanding the problem, both students with high and low emotional quotient can re-explain the contents of the given problem, determine what is known and what is asked in the problem, and choose information to use and information that is not used to solve the problem. In the stage of making a problem solving plan, both students with high and low emotional quotient can determine concepts related to the problem. Students with high emotional quotient can determine more than one way of solving and choosing the method used to solve problems, while students with low quotient only know one way of solving problems. In the stage of carrying out the plan, high emotional quotient students can implement the steps according to the previously made settlement plan to obtain the final answer, while low quotient students cannot implement the steps to the end because she is unsure of the steps chosen. In the stage of re-examining the answers, students with high emotional quotient can determine the final conclusion of the results, while students with low emotional quotient cannot determine the final conclusion because she cannot solve the problem.","PeriodicalId":31516,"journal":{"name":"MATHEdunesa","volume":"149 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MATHEdunesa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v12n2.p635-651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thinking process is a series of cognitive processes that occur in someone’s mental and mind including the stages of remembering, considering, making arguments, and making decisions. Differences in students' thinking processes in solving math problems can be influenced by emotional quotient. This study uses three stages of the thinking process which include (1) Forming understanding, (2) Forming opinions, and (3) Forming conclusions. The aim of this study is to describe the thinking processes of junior high school students with high and low emotional quotient in solving problems of flat side of space. This study is a qualitative descriptive study. The instruments used were the Emotional Quotient Questionnaire, Mathematical Ability Test, Problem Solving Test, and interview guides. This study was conducted on class VIII students of junior high school with the subject of one high emotional quotient student and one low emotional quotient student. The results of this study indicate that in the stage of understanding the problem, both students with high and low emotional quotient can re-explain the contents of the given problem, determine what is known and what is asked in the problem, and choose information to use and information that is not used to solve the problem. In the stage of making a problem solving plan, both students with high and low emotional quotient can determine concepts related to the problem. Students with high emotional quotient can determine more than one way of solving and choosing the method used to solve problems, while students with low quotient only know one way of solving problems. In the stage of carrying out the plan, high emotional quotient students can implement the steps according to the previously made settlement plan to obtain the final answer, while low quotient students cannot implement the steps to the end because she is unsure of the steps chosen. In the stage of re-examining the answers, students with high emotional quotient can determine the final conclusion of the results, while students with low emotional quotient cannot determine the final conclusion because she cannot solve the problem.
基于情商的初中生解题思维过程
思维过程是发生在人的精神和头脑中的一系列认知过程,包括记忆、思考、论证和决策的阶段。学生解决数学问题的思维过程差异会受到情商的影响。本研究采用三个阶段的思维过程,包括(1)形成理解,(2)形成意见,(3)形成结论。本研究旨在探讨高、低情商初中生在解决空间平面问题时的思维过程。本研究为定性描述性研究。使用的工具是情商问卷、数学能力测试、问题解决测试和访谈指南。本研究以初八班学生为研究对象,研究对象为1名高情商学生和1名低情商学生。本研究结果表明,在理解问题的阶段,高情商学生和低情商学生都可以重新解释给定问题的内容,确定问题中已知的和问的内容,并选择使用的信息和不使用的信息来解决问题。在制定问题解决方案阶段,高情商学生和低情商学生都能确定与问题相关的概念。情商高的学生可以确定一种以上的解题方法并选择解决问题的方法,而情商低的学生只知道一种解题方法。在执行方案阶段,情商高的学生可以根据之前制定的解决方案执行步骤,从而得到最终的答案,而情商低的学生由于不确定所选择的步骤,无法将步骤执行到底。在重新检查答案的阶段,情商高的学生可以确定结果的最终结论,而情商低的学生无法确定最终结论,因为她无法解决问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信