Openness to the Future Scale: The Russian Adaptation and Validization

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
A.S. Khegay, A.A. Zolotareva, T.A. Kashtanova, J.S. Vitko, A.A. Lebedeva
{"title":"Openness to the Future Scale: The Russian Adaptation and Validization","authors":"A.S. Khegay, A.A. Zolotareva, T.A. Kashtanova, J.S. Vitko, A.A. Lebedeva","doi":"10.17759/cpp.2023310206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Introduction.</strong> The Openness to the Future Scale (OFS) was developed in 2018 to measure a new phenomenon in the field of positive psychology [5]. Contemporary professionals use it in research on both positive psychological resources and clinical psychological phenomena. <strong>Objective.</strong> The aim of this study was to adapt the Russian&amp;ndash;language version of the Openness to the Future Scale on a population&amp;ndash;based sample. <strong>Method.</strong> There were three groups of respondents: 374 volunteers from the general population, 72 homeless people temporarily living in the &amp;laquo;Warm Reception&amp;raquo; shelter, and 68 young adult graduates of orphanages and teenagers living in orphanages and dormitories at educational institutions. All participants filled out the Russian version of the Openness to the Future Scale, and participants in the second and third groups additionally filled out measures to assess psychological resources. <strong>Results.</strong> Confirmatory factor analysis showed a single&amp;ndash;factor model identical to the factor structure of the original version of the Openness to the Future Scale, which confirmed the factor validity of the adapted instrument. The Cronbach's &amp;alpha;&amp;ndash;value was 0,83, which is evidence in favor of the internal reliability of the Russian version of the Openness to the Future Scale. Openness to the future scores were higher for male and younger respondents compared to female and older respondents. Openness to the future was positively correlated with life attitudes in the homeless and with resilience and proactive coping in young adult graduates and adolescents from orphanages. <strong>Conclusion.</strong> The basic psychometric properties of the adapted instrument allow recommending it as a research tool. This pilot study determines the need for further psychometric examinations of the Russian&amp;ndash;language version of the Openness to the Future Scale, including by expanding the study sample, involving experts and respondents from different age and clinical groups, and comparing self&amp;ndash;report data with objective psychometric assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":43458,"journal":{"name":"Konsultativnaya Psikhologiya i Psikhoterapiya-Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Konsultativnaya Psikhologiya i Psikhoterapiya-Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2023310206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The Openness to the Future Scale (OFS) was developed in 2018 to measure a new phenomenon in the field of positive psychology [5]. Contemporary professionals use it in research on both positive psychological resources and clinical psychological phenomena. Objective. The aim of this study was to adapt the Russian&ndash;language version of the Openness to the Future Scale on a population&ndash;based sample. Method. There were three groups of respondents: 374 volunteers from the general population, 72 homeless people temporarily living in the &laquo;Warm Reception&raquo; shelter, and 68 young adult graduates of orphanages and teenagers living in orphanages and dormitories at educational institutions. All participants filled out the Russian version of the Openness to the Future Scale, and participants in the second and third groups additionally filled out measures to assess psychological resources. Results. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a single&ndash;factor model identical to the factor structure of the original version of the Openness to the Future Scale, which confirmed the factor validity of the adapted instrument. The Cronbach's &alpha;&ndash;value was 0,83, which is evidence in favor of the internal reliability of the Russian version of the Openness to the Future Scale. Openness to the future scores were higher for male and younger respondents compared to female and older respondents. Openness to the future was positively correlated with life attitudes in the homeless and with resilience and proactive coping in young adult graduates and adolescents from orphanages. Conclusion. The basic psychometric properties of the adapted instrument allow recommending it as a research tool. This pilot study determines the need for further psychometric examinations of the Russian&ndash;language version of the Openness to the Future Scale, including by expanding the study sample, involving experts and respondents from different age and clinical groups, and comparing self&ndash;report data with objective psychometric assessments.

面向未来的开放尺度:俄罗斯的适应与验证
p style=" font - family:宋体;">面向未来的开放性量表(OFS)于2018年开发,用于衡量积极心理学领域的一个新现象[5]。当代专业人士将其用于积极心理资源和临床心理现象的研究。& lt; strong>客观灵活;/ strong>本研究的目的是在基于人口的样本上调整俄语版本的“对未来的开放性”量表。& lt; strong>方法灵活;/ strong>调查对象分为三组:374名来自普通民众的志愿者,72名临时住在“温暖接待区”的无家可归者。收容所,68名孤儿院的青年毕业生和生活在孤儿院和教育机构宿舍的青少年。所有的参与者都填写了俄语版的“对未来的开放性”量表,第二组和第三组的参与者额外填写了心理资源评估量表。& lt; strong>结果。;/ strong>验证性因子分析显示单一因子模型与原始版本的对未来的开放性量表的因子结构相同,这证实了调整后的工具的因子效度。Cronbach's α值为0.83,这是支持俄文未来开放性量表内部信度的证据。与女性和老年受访者相比,男性和年轻受访者对未来得分的开放性更高。对未来的开放程度与无家可归者的生活态度呈正相关,与青年毕业生和孤儿院青少年的弹性和主动应对呈正相关。& lt; strong>结论。;/ strong>调整后的仪器的基本心理测量特性允许推荐它作为一种研究工具。本初步研究确定了对俄语版“面向未来的开放性量表”进行进一步心理测量测试的必要性,包括扩大研究样本,让不同年龄和临床群体的专家和受访者参与,并将自我报告数据与客观心理测量评估进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
28.60%
发文量
12
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信