{"title":"Education Prototyping: a Methodological Device for Technical Democracy","authors":"Teresa Swist, Kalervo N. Gulson, Greg Thompson","doi":"10.1007/s42438-023-00426-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The potential of applying a ‘technical democracy’ (Callon et al. 2009) to the context of sociotechnical controversies in education is the focus of this paper. This process reflects an emergent 'thought collective' (Fleck 1979) whose common interests, yet diverse expertise, are articulated through provisional objects and infrastructure for collective and experimental knowledge production. The technique of ‘prototyping’ was then deployed for a design experiment to: first, slow down, or suspend, existing power relations of co-evolving technologies and methodologies and, second, to accelerate, or expand, new possibilities and configurations for democratisation. Education prototyping is then introduced, with the intent to co-produce pluralistic spaces that expose challenges and test possibilities. Key aspects include the following: (i) prototyping dynamics: problematization and prefiguration; and, (ii) prototyping practices: spanning the temporal, methodological, relational, material, and spatial. These aspects were tested in the context of a research project exploring automated essay scoring in Australian schools. While always situated and partial, we argue that prototyping offers a unique device to interrupt and experiment with the politics of collaboratively researching increasingly networked and commercialised technologies across education and society.","PeriodicalId":489236,"journal":{"name":"Postdigital Science and Education","volume":"48 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postdigital Science and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-023-00426-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract The potential of applying a ‘technical democracy’ (Callon et al. 2009) to the context of sociotechnical controversies in education is the focus of this paper. This process reflects an emergent 'thought collective' (Fleck 1979) whose common interests, yet diverse expertise, are articulated through provisional objects and infrastructure for collective and experimental knowledge production. The technique of ‘prototyping’ was then deployed for a design experiment to: first, slow down, or suspend, existing power relations of co-evolving technologies and methodologies and, second, to accelerate, or expand, new possibilities and configurations for democratisation. Education prototyping is then introduced, with the intent to co-produce pluralistic spaces that expose challenges and test possibilities. Key aspects include the following: (i) prototyping dynamics: problematization and prefiguration; and, (ii) prototyping practices: spanning the temporal, methodological, relational, material, and spatial. These aspects were tested in the context of a research project exploring automated essay scoring in Australian schools. While always situated and partial, we argue that prototyping offers a unique device to interrupt and experiment with the politics of collaboratively researching increasingly networked and commercialised technologies across education and society.
将“技术民主”(Callon et al. 2009)应用于教育社会技术争议背景的潜力是本文的重点。这一过程反映了一个新兴的“思想集体”(Fleck 1979),他们的共同利益,但不同的专业知识,通过集体和实验知识生产的临时对象和基础设施来表达。“原型”技术随后被用于设计实验:首先,减缓或暂停共同发展的技术和方法的现有权力关系,其次,加速或扩展民主化的新可能性和配置。然后引入教育原型,目的是共同产生多元化的空间,暴露挑战和测试可能性。关键方面包括以下方面:(i)原型动力学:问题化和预配置;(ii)原型实践:跨越时间、方法、关系、材料和空间。这些方面在一个研究项目的背景下进行了测试,该项目探索了澳大利亚学校的自动作文评分。我们认为,原型设计提供了一种独特的手段,可以中断和实验跨教育和社会合作研究日益网络化和商业化的技术的政治。