Diagnostics of Suicidal Risk in Adolescents: Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
A.Y. Razvaliaeva, N.A. Polskaya, A.Ya. Basova
{"title":"Diagnostics of Suicidal Risk in Adolescents: Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews","authors":"A.Y. Razvaliaeva, N.A. Polskaya, A.Ya. Basova","doi":"10.17759/cpp.2023310202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Study relevance.</strong> Revealing groups of people at high risk of suicide is important for suicide prevention, especially among adolescents, and the practical way of achieving it is screening adolescents for suicide risk. A major obstacle to the development of screening protocols and other preventive procedures is lack of data or conflicting data on measures that can be used in adolescent samples. <strong>Objective</strong>. The current systematic review of systematic reviews was carried out to discover measures of suicide risk with a good predictive validity on adolescent samples. Recommendations for screening implementation were also narratively reviewed. <strong>Method</strong>. Literature search was carried out in PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, EBSCO Academic Search Premier, EBSCO Health Source: Nursing and Academic Edition, and Elibrary. 10 papers that satisfied all inclusion criteria (systematic reviews of measures assessing the risk of suicide in children and adolescents) were included in the study. <strong>Results</strong>. The reviews included in the study were of satisfactory quality. Predictive validity was reported for 18 measures, 16 of them were self-report, and 2 were versions of the Implicit Associative Test. Computerized tests showed relatively low predictive validity coefficients, while self-report measures (including screening questions) had higher predictive validity. <strong>Conclusion</strong>. More studies of predictive validity of the suicide screening measures on adolescent samples are needed. The decision to use a measure in the screening protocol should be also based on practical considerations and resources available to medical workers on cite.</p>","PeriodicalId":43458,"journal":{"name":"Konsultativnaya Psikhologiya i Psikhoterapiya-Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Konsultativnaya Psikhologiya i Psikhoterapiya-Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2023310202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study relevance. Revealing groups of people at high risk of suicide is important for suicide prevention, especially among adolescents, and the practical way of achieving it is screening adolescents for suicide risk. A major obstacle to the development of screening protocols and other preventive procedures is lack of data or conflicting data on measures that can be used in adolescent samples. Objective. The current systematic review of systematic reviews was carried out to discover measures of suicide risk with a good predictive validity on adolescent samples. Recommendations for screening implementation were also narratively reviewed. Method. Literature search was carried out in PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, EBSCO Academic Search Premier, EBSCO Health Source: Nursing and Academic Edition, and Elibrary. 10 papers that satisfied all inclusion criteria (systematic reviews of measures assessing the risk of suicide in children and adolescents) were included in the study. Results. The reviews included in the study were of satisfactory quality. Predictive validity was reported for 18 measures, 16 of them were self-report, and 2 were versions of the Implicit Associative Test. Computerized tests showed relatively low predictive validity coefficients, while self-report measures (including screening questions) had higher predictive validity. Conclusion. More studies of predictive validity of the suicide screening measures on adolescent samples are needed. The decision to use a measure in the screening protocol should be also based on practical considerations and resources available to medical workers on cite.

青少年自杀风险的诊断:系统综述的系统综述
p style="text-align: align;"><strong>揭示自杀高危人群对预防自杀非常重要,尤其是在青少年中,实现这一目标的实际方法是对青少年进行自杀风险筛查。制定筛查方案和其他预防程序的一个主要障碍是缺乏可用于青少年样本的措施的数据或相互矛盾的数据。& lt; strong> Objective< / strong>。目前的系统综述的系统综述进行了发现自杀风险的措施具有良好的预测效度的青少年样本。还叙述了关于筛选实施的建议。& lt; strong> Method< / strong>。在PubMed、Cochrane系统评价数据库、EBSCO学术检索Premier、EBSCO健康来源:护理与学术版和图书馆进行文献检索,符合所有纳入标准(评估儿童和青少年自杀风险措施的系统评价)的10篇论文被纳入研究。& lt; strong> Results< / strong>。纳入研究的综述质量令人满意。共报告了18项量表的预测效度,其中16项为自述量表,2项为内隐联想测验。计算机化测试显示相对较低的预测效度系数,而自我报告测量(包括筛选问题)具有较高的预测效度。& lt; strong> Conclusion< / strong>。自杀筛查措施对青少年样本的预测效度需要更多的研究。在筛查方案中使用某种措施的决定还应基于实际考虑和医疗工作者可获得的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
28.60%
发文量
12
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信