Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment of Sensor Maintenance Work Activity on The Suramadu Bridge Steel Box Girder Area

Nabylla Sharfina Sekar Nurriwanti, Y. Denny A. Wahyudiono, Indriati Paskarini, Ayu Pertimasari Sekar Handayani
{"title":"Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment of Sensor Maintenance Work Activity on The Suramadu Bridge Steel Box Girder Area","authors":"Nabylla Sharfina Sekar Nurriwanti, Y. Denny A. Wahyudiono, Indriati Paskarini, Ayu Pertimasari Sekar Handayani","doi":"10.20473/ijosh.v12i2.2023.227-236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The steel box girder of Suramadu Bridge is a confined work area with sensor maintenance activities and potential hazards. The purpose of this study was to determine the potential hazards and risk levels in the Suramadu Bridge steel box girder work area. Methods: This descriptive study involved cross-sectional data collection. This study used a qualitative risk assessment method. The primary data used in this research included interviews with informants, which consisted of five key informants from experts and five main informants from technicians. The secondary data of the study include a job safety analysis document issued by the Suramadu Bridge Structural Health Monitoring System (SHMS). Risk assessment was performed by determining the level of likelihood and consequences using a risk analysis matrix. Data processing techniques and analysis are based on job safety analysis documents and interviews, whereas the risk analysis table is based on AS/NZS 4360 (2004). Results: The study results show that sensor maintenance work in the steel box girder area involves eight activities, 15 potential hazards, and 19 risks. Conclusion: The study concludes that, Out of the 19 identified risks, three risks (16%) were in the low-risk category, 15 risks (79%) were in the medium-risk category, and one risk (5 %) was in the high-risk category with the potential for fire.","PeriodicalId":33133,"journal":{"name":"The Indonesian Journal of Occupational Safety and Health","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Indonesian Journal of Occupational Safety and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/ijosh.v12i2.2023.227-236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The steel box girder of Suramadu Bridge is a confined work area with sensor maintenance activities and potential hazards. The purpose of this study was to determine the potential hazards and risk levels in the Suramadu Bridge steel box girder work area. Methods: This descriptive study involved cross-sectional data collection. This study used a qualitative risk assessment method. The primary data used in this research included interviews with informants, which consisted of five key informants from experts and five main informants from technicians. The secondary data of the study include a job safety analysis document issued by the Suramadu Bridge Structural Health Monitoring System (SHMS). Risk assessment was performed by determining the level of likelihood and consequences using a risk analysis matrix. Data processing techniques and analysis are based on job safety analysis documents and interviews, whereas the risk analysis table is based on AS/NZS 4360 (2004). Results: The study results show that sensor maintenance work in the steel box girder area involves eight activities, 15 potential hazards, and 19 risks. Conclusion: The study concludes that, Out of the 19 identified risks, three risks (16%) were in the low-risk category, 15 risks (79%) were in the medium-risk category, and one risk (5 %) was in the high-risk category with the potential for fire.
Suramadu大桥钢箱梁区传感器维修作业危害识别与风险评估
苏拉玛杜大桥钢箱梁是一个封闭的工作区域,有传感器维护活动和潜在的危险。本研究的目的是确定苏拉玛杜大桥钢箱梁工作区域的潜在危害和风险水平。方法:采用横断面数据收集的描述性研究。本研究采用定性风险评估方法。本研究中使用的主要数据包括对举报人的访谈,其中包括来自专家的五个关键举报人和来自技术人员的五个主要举报人。本研究的次要资料包括苏拉玛杜桥梁结构健康监测系统(SHMS)发布的工作安全分析文件。通过使用风险分析矩阵确定可能性和后果的水平来进行风险评估。数据处理技术和分析基于工作安全分析文件和访谈,而风险分析表基于AS/NZS 4360(2004)。结果:研究结果表明,钢箱梁区域的传感器维修工作涉及8项活动,15个潜在危害,19个风险。结论:研究得出结论,在确定的19个风险中,3个风险(16%)属于低风险类别,15个风险(79%)属于中等风险类别,1个风险(5%)属于潜在火灾的高风险类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信