Application of accounting for the assessment of war losses for agribusiness enterprises of Ukraine

IF 1.1 Q3 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Valerii Zhuk, Mykola Pugachov, Oleksandr Shpykuliak, Yuliya Bezdushna, Yevheniya Popko
{"title":"Application of accounting for the assessment of war losses for agribusiness enterprises of Ukraine","authors":"Valerii Zhuk, Mykola Pugachov, Oleksandr Shpykuliak, Yuliya Bezdushna, Yevheniya Popko","doi":"10.51599/are.2023.09.03.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. The military aggression of the russian federation against Ukraine led to the disruption of logistics processes and the destruction of the production capacity of the agribusiness. This study aims to describe an accounting toolkit to determine and evaluate the direct losses of agricultural enterprises due to the war.
 Methodology / approach. This study is based on the use of Ukrainian regulatory documents. The authors of this study applied synthesis methods when summarizing information on estimates of war damage. They used analytical methods in monitoring the world and national experience of such assessment. The cost method was used during the approbation. It provided for the use of the estimate program “Building technologies: Estimate 8”. Determining the volumes of repair and construction works was carried out in accordance with the State Construction Standards and Resource Elemental Estimate Standards of Ukraine. In addition, modelling, analogy and comparison methods were also used.
 Results. In this study, the authors proposed a simple algorithm of actions, which allows for detecting direct damage by enterprises in a short time. The algorithm is based on the use of five accounting methods: (1) Inventory method, (2) Documentation method, (3) Evaluation method, (4) Accounts and balance method, (5) Reporting method. The specifics of the application of each method are described in detail, taking into account the requirements of accounting legislation for the recognition and assessment, and inventory of assets of agribusiness enterprises. Experimental calculations (using the example of damage to real estate as a result of hostilities) allowed us to conclude that the damage calculated by the individual (object-by-object) approach (USD 63.88 billion) is 30 % higher than the quick estimate of the World Bank (USD 50.4 billion) and 20 % higher than expert estimates made in Ukraine (USD 50.4 billion).
 Originality / scientific novelty. According to the research results, a methodical algorithm to estimate direct war losses for Ukrainian agribusiness enterprises based on accounting methods has been proposed. Using accounting tools to evaluate the direct losses is essential for the following reason. Let’s suppose that the accounting system does not confirm the data on direct losses. In this case, misunderstandings may arise between the participants of socio-economic relations, who operate with general (forecasted) figures. At the same time, verified accounting data on direct losses can be evidence in court and are the basis for receiving compensation or financial assistance.
 Practical value / implications. The practical significance of the proposed methodical algorithm lies in the ability to systematically recognize and assess direct losses of agribusiness enterprises, taking into account the specifics of their assets, based on the accountant's professional judgment, without the involvement of outside experts.","PeriodicalId":32464,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Resource Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Resource Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2023.09.03.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose. The military aggression of the russian federation against Ukraine led to the disruption of logistics processes and the destruction of the production capacity of the agribusiness. This study aims to describe an accounting toolkit to determine and evaluate the direct losses of agricultural enterprises due to the war. Methodology / approach. This study is based on the use of Ukrainian regulatory documents. The authors of this study applied synthesis methods when summarizing information on estimates of war damage. They used analytical methods in monitoring the world and national experience of such assessment. The cost method was used during the approbation. It provided for the use of the estimate program “Building technologies: Estimate 8”. Determining the volumes of repair and construction works was carried out in accordance with the State Construction Standards and Resource Elemental Estimate Standards of Ukraine. In addition, modelling, analogy and comparison methods were also used. Results. In this study, the authors proposed a simple algorithm of actions, which allows for detecting direct damage by enterprises in a short time. The algorithm is based on the use of five accounting methods: (1) Inventory method, (2) Documentation method, (3) Evaluation method, (4) Accounts and balance method, (5) Reporting method. The specifics of the application of each method are described in detail, taking into account the requirements of accounting legislation for the recognition and assessment, and inventory of assets of agribusiness enterprises. Experimental calculations (using the example of damage to real estate as a result of hostilities) allowed us to conclude that the damage calculated by the individual (object-by-object) approach (USD 63.88 billion) is 30 % higher than the quick estimate of the World Bank (USD 50.4 billion) and 20 % higher than expert estimates made in Ukraine (USD 50.4 billion). Originality / scientific novelty. According to the research results, a methodical algorithm to estimate direct war losses for Ukrainian agribusiness enterprises based on accounting methods has been proposed. Using accounting tools to evaluate the direct losses is essential for the following reason. Let’s suppose that the accounting system does not confirm the data on direct losses. In this case, misunderstandings may arise between the participants of socio-economic relations, who operate with general (forecasted) figures. At the same time, verified accounting data on direct losses can be evidence in court and are the basis for receiving compensation or financial assistance. Practical value / implications. The practical significance of the proposed methodical algorithm lies in the ability to systematically recognize and assess direct losses of agribusiness enterprises, taking into account the specifics of their assets, based on the accountant's professional judgment, without the involvement of outside experts.
乌克兰农业综合企业战争损失评估会计的应用
目的。俄罗斯联邦对乌克兰的军事侵略导致后勤进程中断,破坏了农业综合企业的生产能力。本研究旨在描述一个会计工具来确定和评估农业企业因战争而造成的直接损失。 方法论/方法。本研究基于对乌克兰监管文件的使用。本研究的作者在总结战争损失估计信息时采用了综合方法。它们使用分析方法监测世界和国家在这种评估方面的经验。审批时采用成本法。它提供了评估程序“构建技术:评估8”的使用。根据乌克兰国家建筑标准和资源元素估算标准确定了维修和建筑工程量。此外,还采用了建模、类比、对比等方法。 结果。在本研究中,作者提出了一种简单的行为算法,可以在短时间内发现企业的直接损害。该算法基于五种会计方法的使用:(1)库存法,(2)文件法,(3)评估法,(4)账户和余额法,(5)报告法。考虑到会计立法对农业综合企业资产确认和评估的要求,详细描述了每种方法的具体应用。实验计算(以敌对行动造成的房地产损失为例)使我们得出结论,通过个体(逐个对象)方法计算的损失(638.8亿美元)比世界银行的快速估计(504亿美元)高出30%,比乌克兰专家估计的(504亿美元)高出20%。原创性/科学新颖性。根据研究结果,提出了一种基于会计方法估算乌克兰农业综合企业直接战争损失的方法算法。使用会计工具来评估直接损失是必要的,原因如下。让我们假设会计系统不确认直接损失的数据。在这种情况下,社会经济关系的参与者之间可能会产生误解,他们使用一般(预测)数字。同时,经核实的直接损失会计数据可以作为法庭证据,是获得赔偿或经济援助的依据。 实用价值/含义。所提出的方法算法的实际意义在于,能够在不需要外部专家参与的情况下,根据会计师的专业判断,系统地确认和评估农业综合企业的直接损失,同时考虑到其资产的具体情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agricultural and Resource Economics
Agricultural and Resource Economics Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
30.80%
发文量
51
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信