Opportunities and challenges in cross-border healthcare

Yimeng Wei
{"title":"Opportunities and challenges in cross-border healthcare","authors":"Yimeng Wei","doi":"10.56226/65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The dynamic nature of healthcare delivery and patient mobility in the area has led to an increased focus on cross-border healthcare within the European Union (EU). Cross-border healthcare plans and strategies must take into account the EU's dedication to supporting the \"four freedoms\" of free movement of people, capital, goods, and services. To grasp the opportunities and problems present in this field, it is essential to comprehend how the four Freedoms interact with cross-border healthcare. With a focus on case studies based on the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), this article seeks to examine the benefits and drawbacks of cross-border healthcare within the EU. Methods This article uses the content analysis method to collect all of the case information on the European High Court's website to date and determine the most popular topics. Following that, using case analysis, the typical cases of these dispute-prone locations will be examined to determine the key issues in the area. Results The statistical analysis demonstrates that social security, employee regulations, and freedom to provide services account for the three highest percentages of subject matters addressed by the CJEU. The analysis reveals existing gaps and inconsistencies in the interpretation and implementation of the legal framework. The case study of the CJEU highlights the challenges and complexities associated with harmonizing healthcare systems across member states. Main Contribution to Evidence-Based Practice The main contribution is the provision of evidence-based insights and knowledge that equip stakeholders in the healthcare sector with a holistic view of the field. It allows for informed decision-making, the formulation of effective policies, and the advancement of cross-border healthcare to benefit patients and healthcare systems across the EU.","PeriodicalId":492225,"journal":{"name":"International Healthcare Review (online)","volume":"41 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Healthcare Review (online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56226/65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The dynamic nature of healthcare delivery and patient mobility in the area has led to an increased focus on cross-border healthcare within the European Union (EU). Cross-border healthcare plans and strategies must take into account the EU's dedication to supporting the "four freedoms" of free movement of people, capital, goods, and services. To grasp the opportunities and problems present in this field, it is essential to comprehend how the four Freedoms interact with cross-border healthcare. With a focus on case studies based on the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), this article seeks to examine the benefits and drawbacks of cross-border healthcare within the EU. Methods This article uses the content analysis method to collect all of the case information on the European High Court's website to date and determine the most popular topics. Following that, using case analysis, the typical cases of these dispute-prone locations will be examined to determine the key issues in the area. Results The statistical analysis demonstrates that social security, employee regulations, and freedom to provide services account for the three highest percentages of subject matters addressed by the CJEU. The analysis reveals existing gaps and inconsistencies in the interpretation and implementation of the legal framework. The case study of the CJEU highlights the challenges and complexities associated with harmonizing healthcare systems across member states. Main Contribution to Evidence-Based Practice The main contribution is the provision of evidence-based insights and knowledge that equip stakeholders in the healthcare sector with a holistic view of the field. It allows for informed decision-making, the formulation of effective policies, and the advancement of cross-border healthcare to benefit patients and healthcare systems across the EU.
跨境医疗保健的机遇和挑战
该地区医疗保健服务和患者流动性的动态性质导致了对欧盟(EU)内跨境医疗保健的日益关注。跨境医疗保健计划和战略必须考虑到欧盟致力于支持人员、资本、货物和服务自由流动的“四大自由”。要把握这一领域存在的机遇和问题,就必须了解四大自由如何与跨境医疗保健相互作用。本文以基于欧盟法院(CJEU)的案例研究为重点,试图研究欧盟内部跨境医疗保健的利弊。方法采用内容分析法收集迄今为止欧洲高等法院网站上的所有案件信息,并确定最受欢迎的话题。然后,利用个案分析,审查这些易发生争端地点的典型案例,以确定该地区的关键问题。结果统计分析表明,社会保障、员工规章制度和提供服务的自由是法院审理的三个最高比例的事项。分析揭示了在法律框架的解释和执行方面存在的差距和不一致之处。欧洲司法联盟的案例研究突出了协调各成员国卫生保健系统的挑战和复杂性。主要贡献是提供基于证据的见解和知识,使医疗保健部门的利益相关者对该领域有一个整体的看法。它允许明智的决策,制定有效的政策,并推进跨境医疗保健,使整个欧盟的患者和医疗保健系统受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信