Decolonising marketing: five fundamental decisions for customer engagement

IF 3.7 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Wilhelmina Johanna Greeff
{"title":"Decolonising marketing: five fundamental decisions for customer engagement","authors":"Wilhelmina Johanna Greeff","doi":"10.1108/ejm-05-2022-0394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This paper aims to offer practical, data-led guidance for the decolonisation of marketing strategy, especially as it relates to customer engagement. It does so with an acute understanding of the constraints of brand legitimacy. Design/methodology/approach The findings of this paper are informed both by a conceptual unpacking of institutional, decolonisation and customer engagement literature, as well as an empirical methodology that presents an embedded single case study of a top-ranking banking brand, using in-depth qualitative interviews as well as content analyses of brand communications. Findings The paper examines the notion of institutional brand legitimacy alongside the decolonisation of customer engagement. It offers five empirically driven decisions that marketers must consider when they attempt to decolonise their customer engagement strategies. These revolve around a decolonised bottom-up approach; establishing new biases for customer insights; the management of opposing forces; being strategically transformative; and going beyond diversity. Research limitations/implications A single brand case study is offered that uses a relatively small sample of interviewees and does not include customers of the brand. Further research is therefore needed to reflect other organisational contexts and stakeholders. Just so, the paper specifically looks at the ways in which decolonisation and institutional legitimacy intersect for customer engagement. Further studies that focus on other organisational concepts impacted by decolonisation would be thought-provoking. Originality/value To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first empirical investigation that offers practical guidance for the decolonisation of marketing strategies – as it relates to customer engagement or any other facets of marketing.","PeriodicalId":48401,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Marketing","volume":"52 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-05-2022-0394","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to offer practical, data-led guidance for the decolonisation of marketing strategy, especially as it relates to customer engagement. It does so with an acute understanding of the constraints of brand legitimacy. Design/methodology/approach The findings of this paper are informed both by a conceptual unpacking of institutional, decolonisation and customer engagement literature, as well as an empirical methodology that presents an embedded single case study of a top-ranking banking brand, using in-depth qualitative interviews as well as content analyses of brand communications. Findings The paper examines the notion of institutional brand legitimacy alongside the decolonisation of customer engagement. It offers five empirically driven decisions that marketers must consider when they attempt to decolonise their customer engagement strategies. These revolve around a decolonised bottom-up approach; establishing new biases for customer insights; the management of opposing forces; being strategically transformative; and going beyond diversity. Research limitations/implications A single brand case study is offered that uses a relatively small sample of interviewees and does not include customers of the brand. Further research is therefore needed to reflect other organisational contexts and stakeholders. Just so, the paper specifically looks at the ways in which decolonisation and institutional legitimacy intersect for customer engagement. Further studies that focus on other organisational concepts impacted by decolonisation would be thought-provoking. Originality/value To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first empirical investigation that offers practical guidance for the decolonisation of marketing strategies – as it relates to customer engagement or any other facets of marketing.
非殖民化营销:客户参与的五个基本决策
本文旨在为营销策略的非殖民化提供实用的,以数据为主导的指导,特别是因为它涉及到客户参与。它对品牌合法性的限制有着敏锐的理解。设计/方法/方法本文的研究结果既来自对机构、非殖民化和客户参与文献的概念分析,也来自一种实证方法,该方法采用深度定性访谈和品牌传播的内容分析,对顶级银行品牌进行了嵌入式单一案例研究。本文考察了机构品牌合法性的概念以及客户参与的非殖民化。它提供了五个经验驱动的决策,当营销人员试图去殖民化他们的客户参与策略时,他们必须考虑这些决策。这些都围绕着自下而上的非殖民化方法;为客户洞察建立新的偏见;对抗:对对立力量的控制;战略变革;超越多样性。研究局限/启示提供了一个单一的品牌案例研究,使用了相对较小的受访者样本,不包括该品牌的客户。因此,需要进一步的研究来反映其他组织背景和利益相关者。正因为如此,本文专门研究了非殖民化和机构合法性在客户参与方面的交叉方式。进一步研究受非殖民化影响的其他组织概念将是发人深省的。原创性/价值就作者所知,这是第一次实证调查,为营销策略的非殖民化提供了实用指导——因为它与客户参与或营销的任何其他方面有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: The EJM is receptive to all areas of research which are relevant to marketing academic research, some examples are: ■Sustainability and ethical issues in marketing ■Consumer behaviour ■Advertising and branding issues ■Sales management and personal selling ■Methodology and metatheory of marketing research ■International and export marketing ■Services marketing ■New product development and innovation ■Retailing and distribution ■Macromarketing and societal issues ■Pricing and economic decision making in marketing ■Marketing models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信