Comparison of Pin Site Infection Rate between Schanz Screws And K-Wires in Ilizarov Fixator for Tibial Fracture

Imran Khan
{"title":"Comparison of Pin Site Infection Rate between Schanz Screws And K-Wires in Ilizarov Fixator for Tibial Fracture","authors":"Imran Khan","doi":"10.34297/ajbsr.2023.18.002509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Different methods are used to fix external fixator after tibial fracture each having advantages and disadvantages. Objectives: To compare frequency of pin site infection rate between Schanz screws and k-wires in Ilizarov fixator for tibial fracture. Material and Methods: This Randomized control trial Study was conducted in the Department of Orthopedics, Lady Reading Hospital Medical Teaching Institute Peshawar Pakistan from September 2022 till March 2023 on 166 patients aged 20 to 60 years of both gender undergoing Ilizarov fixation after isolated fracture of tibia were enrolled using non-probability consecutive sampling technique, after approval of hospital ethical committee and written informed consent of patients. Patients were randomly divided into two groups using computer generated random sequence number. Patients in group A were stabilized using K-wires and patients in group B were stabilized using K-wire and Schanz screws. Pin site infection was noted in both groups at the end of 12 weeks. Data was entered and analyzed using SPSS 22. Results: In our study 166 patients were enrolled, 83 patients in each group. Mean age was 35.83±7.1 years in group A and 37.7±11.6 years in group B. There were 66.3% males in group A and 69.9% males in group B, females were 33.7% in group and 30.1% in group B. Pin site infection was more common in K-wire group as compared to Schanz group i.e., 18.1%versus 7.2%, p-value 0.036. Conclusion: Schanz screw is associated with decrease pin site infection rate as compared to K-wire in Ilizarov fixator for tibial fracture.","PeriodicalId":93072,"journal":{"name":"American journal of biomedical science & research","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of biomedical science & research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34297/ajbsr.2023.18.002509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Different methods are used to fix external fixator after tibial fracture each having advantages and disadvantages. Objectives: To compare frequency of pin site infection rate between Schanz screws and k-wires in Ilizarov fixator for tibial fracture. Material and Methods: This Randomized control trial Study was conducted in the Department of Orthopedics, Lady Reading Hospital Medical Teaching Institute Peshawar Pakistan from September 2022 till March 2023 on 166 patients aged 20 to 60 years of both gender undergoing Ilizarov fixation after isolated fracture of tibia were enrolled using non-probability consecutive sampling technique, after approval of hospital ethical committee and written informed consent of patients. Patients were randomly divided into two groups using computer generated random sequence number. Patients in group A were stabilized using K-wires and patients in group B were stabilized using K-wire and Schanz screws. Pin site infection was noted in both groups at the end of 12 weeks. Data was entered and analyzed using SPSS 22. Results: In our study 166 patients were enrolled, 83 patients in each group. Mean age was 35.83±7.1 years in group A and 37.7±11.6 years in group B. There were 66.3% males in group A and 69.9% males in group B, females were 33.7% in group and 30.1% in group B. Pin site infection was more common in K-wire group as compared to Schanz group i.e., 18.1%versus 7.2%, p-value 0.036. Conclusion: Schanz screw is associated with decrease pin site infection rate as compared to K-wire in Ilizarov fixator for tibial fracture.
胫骨骨折Ilizarov固定架中Schanz螺钉与k -丝钉钉位感染率的比较
胫骨骨折后固定外固定架的方法不同,各有优缺点。目的:比较胫骨骨折Ilizarov固定架中Schanz螺钉与k-钢丝的针位感染频率。材料与方法:本随机对照试验研究于2022年9月至2023年3月在巴基斯坦白沙瓦雷丁女士医院医学教学研究所骨科进行,采用非概率连续抽样技术,经医院伦理委员会批准并获得患者书面知情同意,对166例20 - 60岁的男女患者进行了孤立性胫骨骨折后Ilizarov固定。采用计算机生成的随机序列号将患者随机分为两组。A组采用k -丝固定,B组采用k -丝和Schanz螺钉固定。12周后两组均出现针部感染。数据输入和分析使用SPSS 22。结果:本研究共纳入166例患者,每组83例。A组平均年龄为35.83±7.1岁,B组平均年龄为37.7±11.6岁,其中男性占66.3%,B组占69.9%,女性占33.7%,B组占30.1%。K-wire组Pin位点感染发生率高于Schanz组,分别为18.1%和7.2%,p值为0.036。结论:与k -丝在Ilizarov固定架中相比,Schanz螺钉可降低胫骨骨折的钉位感染率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信