COVID-19 sceptics’ attitudes and expectations toward the media: Understanding the role of moral judgements on trust and distrust in journalistic communication on COVID-19

IF 0.8 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Anastasiya Kosyk, Anna Kirsten, Andreas M. Scheu, Bernadette Uth
{"title":"COVID-19 sceptics’ attitudes and expectations toward the media: Understanding the role of moral judgements on trust and distrust in journalistic communication on COVID-19","authors":"Anastasiya Kosyk, Anna Kirsten, Andreas M. Scheu, Bernadette Uth","doi":"10.5771/2192-4007-2023-2-3-155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the COVID-19 pandemic, the German population has become polarised and distrust in social institutions has grown. Despite generally high levels of trust in sci- ence, we have witnessed the emergence of science and COVID-19 sceptics, who are critical of widely accepted scientific knowledge about COVID-19 health risks, treatment and vac- cines. While journalistic information on scientific topics is assumed to be central to knowl- edge formation, little is known thus far about the use of media and the formation of COVID-19 sceptics’ attitudes. This exploratory interview study therefore investigated the trust and distrust expressed by German COVID-19 sceptics regarding journalistic informa- tion on COVID-19. Results indicate that COVID-19 sceptics perceive themselves as criti- cal, responsible media users and informed recipients. They increasingly distrust journalistic science coverage due to what they view as moral failures in journalism; as a result, they prefer alternative media that they believe to be morally superior.","PeriodicalId":32930,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Communication Media","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Communication Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2023-2-3-155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the German population has become polarised and distrust in social institutions has grown. Despite generally high levels of trust in sci- ence, we have witnessed the emergence of science and COVID-19 sceptics, who are critical of widely accepted scientific knowledge about COVID-19 health risks, treatment and vac- cines. While journalistic information on scientific topics is assumed to be central to knowl- edge formation, little is known thus far about the use of media and the formation of COVID-19 sceptics’ attitudes. This exploratory interview study therefore investigated the trust and distrust expressed by German COVID-19 sceptics regarding journalistic informa- tion on COVID-19. Results indicate that COVID-19 sceptics perceive themselves as criti- cal, responsible media users and informed recipients. They increasingly distrust journalistic science coverage due to what they view as moral failures in journalism; as a result, they prefer alternative media that they believe to be morally superior.
COVID-19怀疑论者对媒体的态度和期望:理解关于信任和不信任的道德判断在COVID-19新闻传播中的作用
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,德国人口两极分化,对社会机构的不信任加剧。尽管人们普遍高度信任科学,但我们目睹了科学和COVID-19怀疑论者的出现,他们对有关COVID-19健康风险、治疗和疫苗的广泛接受的科学知识持批评态度。虽然关于科学主题的新闻信息被认为是知识形成的核心,但迄今为止,人们对媒体的使用和COVID-19怀疑论者态度的形成知之甚少。因此,这项探索性访谈研究调查了德国COVID-19怀疑论者对COVID-19新闻信息表达的信任和不信任。结果表明,COVID-19怀疑论者认为自己是批判性的、负责任的媒体用户和知情的接受者。他们越来越不信任新闻科学报道,因为他们认为这是新闻的道德失败;因此,他们更喜欢他们认为在道德上更优越的另类媒体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studies in Communication Media
Studies in Communication Media Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
50 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信