{"title":"Parochialism and Its Meanings in the Latin American Social Sciences: Experiments with Web of Science and SciELO","authors":"Lucas Carvalho, Antonio Brasil","doi":"10.1525/gp.2023.88389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we discuss parochialism in the social sciences (anthropology, political science, and sociology) via scientific indexing data. We take parochialism to mean the discussion of problems and themes related to the researchers’ national societies. To this end, we selected from the Web of Science and SciELO databases documents that have at least one author with institutional affiliation in the United States, Brazil, Argentina, Chile, or Mexico, from 2002 to 2021, totaling 175,821 documents. Based on scientometric techniques, text mining, and network analysis, we propose a multilevel approach to the topic of parochialism in the social sciences. The results point to close degrees of parochialism in all the selected national cases, varying in meaning according to the level of analysis (coauthorship, bigrams, and bibliographic references).","PeriodicalId":91118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global health perspectives","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global health perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/gp.2023.88389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this article, we discuss parochialism in the social sciences (anthropology, political science, and sociology) via scientific indexing data. We take parochialism to mean the discussion of problems and themes related to the researchers’ national societies. To this end, we selected from the Web of Science and SciELO databases documents that have at least one author with institutional affiliation in the United States, Brazil, Argentina, Chile, or Mexico, from 2002 to 2021, totaling 175,821 documents. Based on scientometric techniques, text mining, and network analysis, we propose a multilevel approach to the topic of parochialism in the social sciences. The results point to close degrees of parochialism in all the selected national cases, varying in meaning according to the level of analysis (coauthorship, bigrams, and bibliographic references).
在本文中,我们通过科学索引数据讨论了社会科学(人类学、政治学和社会学)中的狭隘主义。我们认为狭隘是指研究人员对与本国社会相关的问题和主题的讨论。为此,我们从Web of Science和SciELO数据库中选择了2002年至2021年间至少有一位作者与美国、巴西、阿根廷、智利或墨西哥的机构有关联的文献,共计175,821篇文献。基于科学计量技术、文本挖掘和网络分析,我们提出了一种多层次的方法来研究社会科学中的狭隘主义。结果表明,在所有选定的国家案例中,狭隘的程度都很接近,根据分析水平(合著、双引号和参考书目),狭隘的含义也有所不同。