L1-L2 congruency as a criterion to identify collocations based on contrastive analysis

Maryam Barghamadi, James Rogers, Joanne Arciuli, Weifeng Han, Amanda Muller
{"title":"L1-L2 congruency as a criterion to identify collocations based on contrastive analysis","authors":"Maryam Barghamadi, James Rogers, Joanne Arciuli, Weifeng Han, Amanda Muller","doi":"10.29140/ajal.v6n1.716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In second language learning research, L1-L2 congruency refers to the similarity in form and meaning of the way a word or phrase is said between two languages. If there is low L1-L2 congruency, the learning burden of a word or phrase can be higher, and thus, such items should be focused on more in teaching to help learners avoid errors. For example, an unacceptable structure could be produced when second language learners use direct or literal translation to formulate multiword units (MWUs) in the target language. This study used L1-L2 congruency as a criterion to identify English MWUs with low congruency with their Persian equivalents to create a resource for Persian-speaking English learners. An L1-L2 contrastive analysis was conducted on a list of approximately 11,000 high-frequency MWUs. This list was translated, and the items were given ratings regarding their congruency in Persian. The results revealed that more than 65% of the items examined were incongruent with their word-for-word translations, demonstrating that L1-L2 congruency is a significant factor in selecting MWUs for Persian-speaking English learners. Since focusing on incongruent items may help learners avoid errors, the results of this study can help improve the efficacy of English acquisition by Persian-speaking learners through its identification of particular MWUs that have low congruency between the two languages.","PeriodicalId":477449,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of applied linguistics","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of applied linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29140/ajal.v6n1.716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In second language learning research, L1-L2 congruency refers to the similarity in form and meaning of the way a word or phrase is said between two languages. If there is low L1-L2 congruency, the learning burden of a word or phrase can be higher, and thus, such items should be focused on more in teaching to help learners avoid errors. For example, an unacceptable structure could be produced when second language learners use direct or literal translation to formulate multiword units (MWUs) in the target language. This study used L1-L2 congruency as a criterion to identify English MWUs with low congruency with their Persian equivalents to create a resource for Persian-speaking English learners. An L1-L2 contrastive analysis was conducted on a list of approximately 11,000 high-frequency MWUs. This list was translated, and the items were given ratings regarding their congruency in Persian. The results revealed that more than 65% of the items examined were incongruent with their word-for-word translations, demonstrating that L1-L2 congruency is a significant factor in selecting MWUs for Persian-speaking English learners. Since focusing on incongruent items may help learners avoid errors, the results of this study can help improve the efficacy of English acquisition by Persian-speaking learners through its identification of particular MWUs that have low congruency between the two languages.
基于对比分析,以L1-L2一致性为判断搭配的标准
在第二语言学习研究中,L1-L2一致性是指两种语言之间的单词或短语在形式和意义上的相似性。如果一个单词或短语的L1-L2一致性较低,那么这个单词或短语的学习负担可能会更高,因此,在教学中应该更多地关注这些项目,以帮助学习者避免错误。例如,当第二语言学习者使用直接或直译在目标语言中形成多词单位(mwu)时,可能会产生不可接受的结构。本研究以母语与第二语言的一致性为标准,识别与波斯语对等语一致性较低的英语MWUs,为波斯语英语学习者提供参考资料。对大约11000个高频mwu进行了L1-L2对比分析。这个列表是翻译的,并且根据它们在波斯语中的一致性给出了评分。结果显示,超过65%的被检查项目与他们的逐字翻译不一致,这表明母语-二语一致性是波斯语英语学习者选择mwu的重要因素。由于关注不一致的项目可以帮助学习者避免错误,本研究的结果可以通过识别两种语言之间一致性较低的特定mwu来帮助波斯语学习者提高英语习得效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书