Biospheric Values Predict Ecological Cooperation in a Commons Dilemma Scenario

IF 2 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Adam C. Davis, Steven Arnocky, Mirella L. Stroink
{"title":"Biospheric Values Predict Ecological Cooperation in a Commons Dilemma Scenario","authors":"Adam C. Davis, Steven Arnocky, Mirella L. Stroink","doi":"10.1089/eco.2021.0067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In ecological commons dilemma research, environmental values tend to be treated as a monolith. However, environmental values vary and they do not equally predict proenvironmental behavior. In this study, we investigated the impact of three kinds of proenvironmental values (egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric) on competitive and cooperative behavior in a hypothetical ecological commons dilemma scenario. Two hundred Canadian undergraduate students completed an online survey assessing proenvironmental value orientation and commons dilemma decision-making tendencies. In line with our hypothesis, controlling for demographic characteristics (e.g., gender) and key facets of social desirability (e.g., impression management), egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric values positively predicted competition, altruistic cooperation, and ecological cooperation, respectively, within the commons dilemma. Results show that to promote the sustainable consumption of shared ecological resources, it is prudent for educators, environmental managers, and policy makers to encourage the expression of biospheric values.","PeriodicalId":46262,"journal":{"name":"Ecopsychology","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecopsychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2021.0067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In ecological commons dilemma research, environmental values tend to be treated as a monolith. However, environmental values vary and they do not equally predict proenvironmental behavior. In this study, we investigated the impact of three kinds of proenvironmental values (egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric) on competitive and cooperative behavior in a hypothetical ecological commons dilemma scenario. Two hundred Canadian undergraduate students completed an online survey assessing proenvironmental value orientation and commons dilemma decision-making tendencies. In line with our hypothesis, controlling for demographic characteristics (e.g., gender) and key facets of social desirability (e.g., impression management), egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric values positively predicted competition, altruistic cooperation, and ecological cooperation, respectively, within the commons dilemma. Results show that to promote the sustainable consumption of shared ecological resources, it is prudent for educators, environmental managers, and policy makers to encourage the expression of biospheric values.
在公地困境情景下生物圈价值预测生态合作
在生态公地困境研究中,环境价值往往被视为一个整体。然而,环境价值各不相同,它们并不能平等地预测亲环境行为。在本研究中,我们研究了在一个假设的生态公地困境情景下,三种亲环境价值观(利己主义、利他主义和生物圈)对竞争和合作行为的影响。200名加拿大本科生完成了一项评估亲环境价值取向和公地困境决策倾向的在线调查。根据我们的假设,在控制人口特征(如性别)和社会可取性的关键方面(如印象管理)的情况下,利己主义、利他主义和生物圈价值观分别积极地预测了公地困境中的竞争、利他主义合作和生态合作。结果表明,为了促进共享生态资源的可持续消费,教育工作者、环境管理者和政策制定者应鼓励表达生物圈价值观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecopsychology
Ecopsychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信