The Lex Favor Reo Principle After New Criminal Code: A Corrective Justice’s Perspective

Henny Saida Flora, Fradhana Putra Disantara, Mac Thi Hoai Thuong
{"title":"The Lex Favor Reo Principle After New Criminal Code: A Corrective Justice’s Perspective","authors":"Henny Saida Flora, Fradhana Putra Disantara, Mac Thi Hoai Thuong","doi":"10.31941/pj.v22i2.2997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to analyze the existence and implications of the lex favor reo principle after the ratification of the new Criminal Code in relation to aspects of corrective justice. This research is normative legal research by prioritizing conceptual and statutory approaches. The results of the study show that the existence of the lex favor reo principle after the ratification of the new Criminal Code, namely as formulated in Article 3 juncto Article 618 of the new Criminal Code, the existence and applicability of the lex favor reo principle can be immediately enforced. The implication of the lex favor reo principle in optimizing aspects of corrective justice after the ratification of the new Criminal Code is that the implementation of the lex favor reo principle has implications for the existence of criminal sanctions experienced by defendants in the old Criminal Code. Suggestions in this study are that for law enforcement officials, special attention is needed when trying a crime, especially by first paying attention to the lex favor reo principle to see which sanctions are more profitable for the accused.","PeriodicalId":471669,"journal":{"name":"Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum (edisi elektronik)","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum (edisi elektronik)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i2.2997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the existence and implications of the lex favor reo principle after the ratification of the new Criminal Code in relation to aspects of corrective justice. This research is normative legal research by prioritizing conceptual and statutory approaches. The results of the study show that the existence of the lex favor reo principle after the ratification of the new Criminal Code, namely as formulated in Article 3 juncto Article 618 of the new Criminal Code, the existence and applicability of the lex favor reo principle can be immediately enforced. The implication of the lex favor reo principle in optimizing aspects of corrective justice after the ratification of the new Criminal Code is that the implementation of the lex favor reo principle has implications for the existence of criminal sanctions experienced by defendants in the old Criminal Code. Suggestions in this study are that for law enforcement officials, special attention is needed when trying a crime, especially by first paying attention to the lex favor reo principle to see which sanctions are more profitable for the accused.
新刑法典后的法惠原则:一个矫正司法的视角
本研究的目的在于分析新刑法典批准后,对矫正司法方面的法律利益原则的存在及其影响。这项研究是规范性的法律研究,优先考虑概念和成文法的方法。研究结果表明,在新刑法典批准后,即新刑法典第3条至第618条所规定的法惠原则的存在,法惠原则的存在和适用可以立即得到执行。重审法原则在新刑法典批准后优化矫正司法方面的意义在于,重审法原则的实施对旧刑法典中被告人所经历的刑事制裁的存在具有启示意义。本研究的建议是,对于执法人员来说,在审判犯罪时需要特别注意,特别是首先要注意法对法原则,看看哪种制裁对被告更有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信