Bienestar, salud mental óptima y florecimiento: esclareciendo y diferenciando conceptos complejos

IF 0.6 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ahmad Ramsés Barragán Estrada
{"title":"Bienestar, salud mental óptima y florecimiento: esclareciendo y diferenciando conceptos complejos","authors":"Ahmad Ramsés Barragán Estrada","doi":"10.24265/liberabit.2023.v29n2.680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Backgrounds: this theoretical article reviews empirically and in detail the concepts of well-being, optimal/positive mental health, types of well-being and flourishing, with a view to clarification and differentiation based on what the current scientific literature offers, and given that they are often used as synonyms, or as interchangeable terms. State of the art: various criteria of inclusion and reference of what we usually consider \"positive\" and \"negative\" in scientific studies of well-being and distress (disease, pathogenic, decay) are explained and proposed as a framework and reliable guide for future research and work methodologies related to the constructs studied here, as well as a means of support in the elaboration and enrichment of the same definitions. In addition, specific and differentiated concepts of well-being, optimal mental health and flourishing, which are recognized as independent but interrelated, are proposed and articulated. Conclusions: the review of the literature and analysis of the information led to the emergence of a new concept called \"integrative wellbeing\", which seeks to compile the existing types of wellbeing and mental health that together are conducive to individual and social flourishing. Thus, we sought to have an impact on the use of adequate, current and functional terminology, due to the complexity and dynamism offered by the terms; trusting, in addition, that it will allow researchers and various professionals, the conformation and development of evaluation instruments, as well as possible practical applications in clinical, educational, social, political, labor or other fields.","PeriodicalId":42891,"journal":{"name":"Liberabit-Revista de Psicologia","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liberabit-Revista de Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24265/liberabit.2023.v29n2.680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds: this theoretical article reviews empirically and in detail the concepts of well-being, optimal/positive mental health, types of well-being and flourishing, with a view to clarification and differentiation based on what the current scientific literature offers, and given that they are often used as synonyms, or as interchangeable terms. State of the art: various criteria of inclusion and reference of what we usually consider "positive" and "negative" in scientific studies of well-being and distress (disease, pathogenic, decay) are explained and proposed as a framework and reliable guide for future research and work methodologies related to the constructs studied here, as well as a means of support in the elaboration and enrichment of the same definitions. In addition, specific and differentiated concepts of well-being, optimal mental health and flourishing, which are recognized as independent but interrelated, are proposed and articulated. Conclusions: the review of the literature and analysis of the information led to the emergence of a new concept called "integrative wellbeing", which seeks to compile the existing types of wellbeing and mental health that together are conducive to individual and social flourishing. Thus, we sought to have an impact on the use of adequate, current and functional terminology, due to the complexity and dynamism offered by the terms; trusting, in addition, that it will allow researchers and various professionals, the conformation and development of evaluation instruments, as well as possible practical applications in clinical, educational, social, political, labor or other fields.
幸福,最佳心理健康和繁荣:澄清和区分复杂的概念
背景:这篇理论文章以经验和详细的方式回顾了幸福、最佳/积极心理健康、幸福类型和繁荣的概念,以期根据当前科学文献提供的内容进行澄清和区分,并考虑到它们经常被用作同义词或可互换的术语。最新进展:在福祉和痛苦(疾病、致病性、衰退)的科学研究中,我们通常认为的"积极"和"消极"的各种纳入和参考标准被解释和提出,作为与本文研究的结构相关的未来研究和工作方法的框架和可靠指南,以及在阐述和丰富相同定义方面的支持手段。此外,提出并阐述了幸福感、最佳心理健康和繁荣的具体和不同概念,这些概念被认为是独立但相互关联的。结论:对文献的回顾和信息的分析导致了一个名为“综合幸福感”的新概念的出现,该概念旨在汇编现有的有利于个人和社会繁荣的幸福感和心理健康类型。因此,由于术语的复杂性和动态性,我们试图对适当的、当前的和功能性术语的使用产生影响;此外,相信它将使研究人员和各种专业人员能够形成和发展评估工具,并可能在临床、教育、社会、政治、劳动或其他领域得到实际应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Liberabit-Revista de Psicologia
Liberabit-Revista de Psicologia PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
14.30%
发文量
9
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信