{"title":"The Influence of Parenting Styles on Child Development","authors":"Sanober Khanum, Rabia Mushtaq, Muhammad Danish Kamal, Zuhaib Nishtar, Kashif Lodhi","doi":"10.61506/02.00022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Influence of Parenting Styles on Child Development is a quantitative survey research study that investigates the intricate connection between parenting styles and their profound impact on the development of children. Employing a convenient sampling technique, the study involved a sample size of 150(83 males, 67 females) parents, aiming to explore the diverse parenting styles and their potential implications for child development across various domains. This research examines four primary parenting styles: authoritative, authoritarian, permissive, and neglectful, each characterized by distinct combinations of parental warmth and control. By surveying and analyzing the responses and behaviors of participating parents, the study illuminates the far-reaching influence of these parenting styles on child development. In terms of cognitive development, the study's findings reveal significant differences based on parenting style. Authoritative parenting, characterized by high levels of warmth and reasonable control, is associated with positive cognitive outcomes in children. Such children tend to exhibit better problem-solving skills, higher academic achievement, and greater intellectual curiosity. Conversely, authoritarian parenting, which emphasizes strict control and lacks warmth, tends to yield children with increased anxiety, lower self-esteem, and diminished cognitive growth. Emotional development is another critical dimension explored in this research. Children raised by authoritative parents typically demonstrate enhanced emotional regulation and resilience. On the contrary, children subjected to authoritarian parenting often struggle with emotional expression and may face challenges in forming healthy emotional bonds. The study also delves into social development, highlighting the profound impact of parenting styles in this realm. Authoritative parenting contributes to the development of socially competent and well-adjusted children, while authoritarian parenting may lead to social withdrawal or aggressive behavior in children. The research underscores the importance of a balanced and supportive approach to parenting in fostering healthy social relationships and interpersonal skills. Overall, this quantitative survey research study sheds light on the pivotal role of parenting styles in shaping the trajectory of child development. Its findings underscore the significance of authoritative parenting, which combines warmth and appropriate levels of control, as an effective approach to nurturing well-rounded and thriving children.","PeriodicalId":46316,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy Research in Tourism Leisure and Events","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Policy Research in Tourism Leisure and Events","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Influence of Parenting Styles on Child Development is a quantitative survey research study that investigates the intricate connection between parenting styles and their profound impact on the development of children. Employing a convenient sampling technique, the study involved a sample size of 150(83 males, 67 females) parents, aiming to explore the diverse parenting styles and their potential implications for child development across various domains. This research examines four primary parenting styles: authoritative, authoritarian, permissive, and neglectful, each characterized by distinct combinations of parental warmth and control. By surveying and analyzing the responses and behaviors of participating parents, the study illuminates the far-reaching influence of these parenting styles on child development. In terms of cognitive development, the study's findings reveal significant differences based on parenting style. Authoritative parenting, characterized by high levels of warmth and reasonable control, is associated with positive cognitive outcomes in children. Such children tend to exhibit better problem-solving skills, higher academic achievement, and greater intellectual curiosity. Conversely, authoritarian parenting, which emphasizes strict control and lacks warmth, tends to yield children with increased anxiety, lower self-esteem, and diminished cognitive growth. Emotional development is another critical dimension explored in this research. Children raised by authoritative parents typically demonstrate enhanced emotional regulation and resilience. On the contrary, children subjected to authoritarian parenting often struggle with emotional expression and may face challenges in forming healthy emotional bonds. The study also delves into social development, highlighting the profound impact of parenting styles in this realm. Authoritative parenting contributes to the development of socially competent and well-adjusted children, while authoritarian parenting may lead to social withdrawal or aggressive behavior in children. The research underscores the importance of a balanced and supportive approach to parenting in fostering healthy social relationships and interpersonal skills. Overall, this quantitative survey research study sheds light on the pivotal role of parenting styles in shaping the trajectory of child development. Its findings underscore the significance of authoritative parenting, which combines warmth and appropriate levels of control, as an effective approach to nurturing well-rounded and thriving children.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure & Events provides a unique forum for critical discussion of public policy debates relating to the fields of tourism, leisure and events. This encompasses the economic, social, cultural, political and environmental dimensions of official intervention. In addition to high quality theoretical and empirical papers, the journal publishes contributions examining the value of contrasting methodologies, or advocacy of novel methods. Inter- and multi-disciplinary submissions are particularly welcome. In order to foster debate and extend the scope of discussion, it publishes shorter carefully argued position statements on specific, topical interventions in the Contemporary Policy Debates section. In addition, the journal’s novel Dialogues section involves ‘point/counter-point’ debates between contributors on a range of policy-related or policy research-related topics. These may interrogate key concepts from different cultural, theoretical or spatial perspectives, or discuss potential responses to a range of practical challenges involved in undertaking policy-related research in the fields of tourism, leisure and events. With a swiftly growing academic reputation, the journal is ‘B’ rated by the Australian Business Deans Council (ABDC). It has received citations from a number of senior practitioners and influential bodies, including the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).