ANALISIS KEWENANGAN DPR TERHADAP POLEMIK PENGGANTIAN HAKIM MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI

Fuad Abdul Azis, Irham Ramur
{"title":"ANALISIS KEWENANGAN DPR TERHADAP POLEMIK PENGGANTIAN HAKIM MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI","authors":"Fuad Abdul Azis, Irham Ramur","doi":"10.58326/jurnallisyabab.v4i1.153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Therefore, the Indonesian constitution guarantees the independence of the judiciary from the intervention of other institutions. The polemic of the removal of a judge of the Constitutional Court by the House of Representatives has left a negative precedent in the Indonesian state administration. Moreover, Indonesia adheres to a system of separation of power or power sharing, where no one institution is higher than another state institution. Judicial power institutions are required to have freedom in carrying out their duties and functions. The dynamics of dismissing the Constitutional Court judge annulled the independence of the Constitutional Court. From the point of view of its own authority, the DPR cannot remove a judge from the Constitutional Court.","PeriodicalId":489007,"journal":{"name":"Lisyabab Jurnal Studi Islam dan Sosial","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lisyabab Jurnal Studi Islam dan Sosial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58326/jurnallisyabab.v4i1.153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Therefore, the Indonesian constitution guarantees the independence of the judiciary from the intervention of other institutions. The polemic of the removal of a judge of the Constitutional Court by the House of Representatives has left a negative precedent in the Indonesian state administration. Moreover, Indonesia adheres to a system of separation of power or power sharing, where no one institution is higher than another state institution. Judicial power institutions are required to have freedom in carrying out their duties and functions. The dynamics of dismissing the Constitutional Court judge annulled the independence of the Constitutional Court. From the point of view of its own authority, the DPR cannot remove a judge from the Constitutional Court.
众议院对宪法法院推翻法官的民意调查
因此,印度尼西亚宪法保障司法独立,不受其他机构的干预。众议院罢免宪法法院一名法官的争论在印度尼西亚国家行政当局留下了一个消极的先例。此外,印度尼西亚坚持权力分立或权力分享制度,没有一个机构高于另一个国家机构。司法权机构应当有履行职责的自由。罢免宪法裁判所法官的动态使宪法裁判所的独立性无效。从其本身的权威来看,民主人民共和国不能将一名法官从宪法法院撤职。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信