Public friendliness towards Frontline Healthcare workers in Kolkata, India: Preparedness towards a future pandemic

Shibaji Gupta, Abhishek De, Rahul Biswas, Baijayanti Baur, Arup Chakraborty
{"title":"Public friendliness towards Frontline Healthcare workers in Kolkata, India: Preparedness towards a future pandemic","authors":"Shibaji Gupta, Abhishek De, Rahul Biswas, Baijayanti Baur, Arup Chakraborty","doi":"10.51957/healthline_522_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: A new wave of COVID-19 infection has hit China of late and India due to her geographical proximity is at risk. More than 700 doctors in India have died on the frontline during COVID-19. Despite their sacrifices and service, discretionary behaviour by the public have been frequently reported. Objective: To assess the attitude and perception towards frontline Health Care Workers (HCW’s) among residents of a selected zone of Kolkata (India). Method: An observational study of cross-sectional design was performed in December 2022, using a pre-designedstructured questionnaire, that was sent to the registered email address of the families residing in the selected area of a zone located in Southern Kolkataand response from one eligible member per family was assessed. Of 142 families residing in the area, responses from 119 families were obtained. Results: Most participants agreed or strongly agreed to co-operating with HCW’s during door-to-door screening campaigns and supporting their families (94.8% and 83.7% respectively). Majority (74.4%) favoured functioning of private clinics; however, 60.7% didn’t want to allow doctors to work post-COVID recovery. Though 64.9% believed HCW’s were taking adequate measures to contain disease spread, 77.8% wanted to maintain more than required ‘safe distance’ from them and 35.1% favoured keeping them away from neighbourhood. About 67% thought HCW’s were properly trained and equipped to handle COVID-19 cases (47.8%). Participants with age more than 33 years (p=0.030), males (p=0.044) and who sought health advice in last month (p=0.016)were found to have a favourable attitude. Conclusion: The study finds a mixed opinion in the public about HCWs. Considering the difficulties faced byHCWs, which affected the functioning of the healthcare system, this scenario can be tricky while tackling similar emergencies of the future. Hence, measures to reduce societal stigma against HCWs is of great necessity.","PeriodicalId":33836,"journal":{"name":"Healthline","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthline","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51957/healthline_522_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A new wave of COVID-19 infection has hit China of late and India due to her geographical proximity is at risk. More than 700 doctors in India have died on the frontline during COVID-19. Despite their sacrifices and service, discretionary behaviour by the public have been frequently reported. Objective: To assess the attitude and perception towards frontline Health Care Workers (HCW’s) among residents of a selected zone of Kolkata (India). Method: An observational study of cross-sectional design was performed in December 2022, using a pre-designedstructured questionnaire, that was sent to the registered email address of the families residing in the selected area of a zone located in Southern Kolkataand response from one eligible member per family was assessed. Of 142 families residing in the area, responses from 119 families were obtained. Results: Most participants agreed or strongly agreed to co-operating with HCW’s during door-to-door screening campaigns and supporting their families (94.8% and 83.7% respectively). Majority (74.4%) favoured functioning of private clinics; however, 60.7% didn’t want to allow doctors to work post-COVID recovery. Though 64.9% believed HCW’s were taking adequate measures to contain disease spread, 77.8% wanted to maintain more than required ‘safe distance’ from them and 35.1% favoured keeping them away from neighbourhood. About 67% thought HCW’s were properly trained and equipped to handle COVID-19 cases (47.8%). Participants with age more than 33 years (p=0.030), males (p=0.044) and who sought health advice in last month (p=0.016)were found to have a favourable attitude. Conclusion: The study finds a mixed opinion in the public about HCWs. Considering the difficulties faced byHCWs, which affected the functioning of the healthcare system, this scenario can be tricky while tackling similar emergencies of the future. Hence, measures to reduce societal stigma against HCWs is of great necessity.
公众对印度加尔各答一线医护人员的友好态度:为未来的大流行做好准备
导读:新一波COVID-19感染最近袭击了中国,由于地理位置接近,印度处于危险之中。在2019冠状病毒病期间,印度有700多名医生死在前线。尽管他们做出了牺牲和贡献,公众的随意行为还是经常被报道出来。目的:了解印度加尔各答某地区居民对一线医护人员的态度和认知。方法:于2022年12月进行了一项横断面设计的观察性研究,使用预先设计的结构化问卷,将问卷发送到居住在加尔各答南部选定区域的家庭的注册电子邮件地址,并评估每个家庭一名符合条件的成员的回答。在居住在该地区的142个家庭中,获得了119个家庭的答复。结果:大多数参与者同意或强烈同意在上门筛查活动中与HCW合作并支持其家庭(分别为94.8%和83.7%)。大多数人(74.4%)赞成私人诊所的运作;然而,60.7%的人不希望医生在covid - 19后恢复工作。尽管64.9%的人认为医护人员采取了适当的措施来控制疾病传播,77.8%的人希望与他们保持超过要求的"安全距离",35.1%的人赞成让他们远离邻居。约67%的人认为医护人员接受了适当的培训和装备,可以处理COVID-19病例(47.8%)。年龄在33岁以上(p=0.030)、男性(p=0.044)以及在最近一个月内寻求过健康建议(p=0.016)的参与者对健康持积极态度。结论:研究发现公众对卫生保健工作者的看法不一。考虑到医护人员所面临的困难,这些困难影响了医疗保健系统的运作,在处理未来类似的紧急情况时,这种情况可能会很棘手。因此,采取措施减少对卫生保健工作者的社会污名是非常必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信