A prospective study to analyze the functional outcome of the femoral neck system in femoral neck fractures

Arvind Vatkar, Sachin Kale, Ronak Mishra, Sushmit Singh, Ajit Chalak, Rahul Ghodke, Sonali Das, Nikhil Issacs, Suraj Doshi
{"title":"A prospective study to analyze the functional outcome of the femoral neck system in femoral neck fractures","authors":"Arvind Vatkar, Sachin Kale, Ronak Mishra, Sushmit Singh, Ajit Chalak, Rahul Ghodke, Sonali Das, Nikhil Issacs, Suraj Doshi","doi":"10.4103/mgmj.mgmj_138_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In 2017, a new fixation device called the femoral neck system (FNS), manufactured by DePuy Synthes orthopedics company of Johnson & Johnson, was introduced to manage femoral neck fractures. The primary objective of this study was to present our firsthand experience with this device in treating femoral neck fractures and to evaluate its clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods: With ethical committee approval, we conducted a prospective study involving patients aged 18 years or older but no more than 60 years. The study included a final sample size of 30 participants, selected based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patient records were reviewed to collect data on blood loss, fracture type, internal fixation methods, and the duration of clinical follow-up. Continuous variables were analyzed, and their mean values, standard deviations, and ranges were reported. The clinical assessment of patients was carried out using the Harris hip score and postoperative X-rays at regular intervals. Results: In our study, the gender distribution among the patients showed that 60% were females and 40% were males. The patient’s average age was 44.12 years, with a standard deviation of 2 years. The functional outcomes of patients treated with FNS using the hospital for special surgery (HSS) method were compared at different postoperative time points: 6 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months. The statistical analysis revealed significant differences in functional outcomes at these time intervals. During the study, two cases of postoperative complications were observed among the patients. These complications were addressed through specific interventions, namely bipolar hemiarthroplasty and shoe raise to correct limb shortening. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that FNS yielded positive outcomes, significantly improving the HSS scores. Additionally, we observed that FNS was associated with minimal intraoperative blood loss in the cases we examined.","PeriodicalId":52587,"journal":{"name":"MGM Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MGM Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/mgmj.mgmj_138_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In 2017, a new fixation device called the femoral neck system (FNS), manufactured by DePuy Synthes orthopedics company of Johnson & Johnson, was introduced to manage femoral neck fractures. The primary objective of this study was to present our firsthand experience with this device in treating femoral neck fractures and to evaluate its clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods: With ethical committee approval, we conducted a prospective study involving patients aged 18 years or older but no more than 60 years. The study included a final sample size of 30 participants, selected based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patient records were reviewed to collect data on blood loss, fracture type, internal fixation methods, and the duration of clinical follow-up. Continuous variables were analyzed, and their mean values, standard deviations, and ranges were reported. The clinical assessment of patients was carried out using the Harris hip score and postoperative X-rays at regular intervals. Results: In our study, the gender distribution among the patients showed that 60% were females and 40% were males. The patient’s average age was 44.12 years, with a standard deviation of 2 years. The functional outcomes of patients treated with FNS using the hospital for special surgery (HSS) method were compared at different postoperative time points: 6 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months. The statistical analysis revealed significant differences in functional outcomes at these time intervals. During the study, two cases of postoperative complications were observed among the patients. These complications were addressed through specific interventions, namely bipolar hemiarthroplasty and shoe raise to correct limb shortening. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that FNS yielded positive outcomes, significantly improving the HSS scores. Additionally, we observed that FNS was associated with minimal intraoperative blood loss in the cases we examined.
一项分析股骨颈骨折股骨颈系统功能结局的前瞻性研究
背景:2017年,强生公司DePuy Synthes骨科公司推出了一种名为股骨颈系统(FNS)的新型固定装置,用于治疗股骨颈骨折。本研究的主要目的是介绍我们使用该装置治疗股骨颈骨折的第一手经验,并评估其临床效果。材料和方法:经伦理委员会批准,我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,涉及年龄在18岁或以上但不超过60岁的患者。该研究的最终样本量为30名参与者,根据特定的纳入和排除标准进行选择。回顾患者记录,收集出血量、骨折类型、内固定方法和临床随访时间的数据。对连续变量进行分析,并报告其平均值、标准差和极差。采用Harris髋关节评分和术后定期x光片对患者进行临床评估。结果:本组患者性别分布中,女性占60%,男性占40%。患者平均年龄44.12岁,标准差为2岁。比较采用特殊外科医院(HSS)方法治疗FNS患者在术后6周、3个月和12个月不同时间点的功能结局。统计分析显示,在这些时间间隔内,功能结果有显著差异。在研究过程中,观察到2例患者出现术后并发症。这些并发症是通过特定的干预措施解决的,即双极半关节置换术和提鞋来纠正肢体缩短。结论:我们的研究表明FNS具有积极的效果,显著提高了HSS评分。此外,我们观察到,在我们检查的病例中,FNS与最小的术中出血量相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信