O colecionador de exemplos: reflexões sobre o estatuto do exemplo a partir de Said Ali

IF 0.5 Q4 REHABILITATION
Thaís de Araujo da Costa, Vanise Gomes de Medeiros
{"title":"O colecionador de exemplos: reflexões sobre o estatuto do exemplo a partir de Said Ali","authors":"Thaís de Araujo da Costa, Vanise Gomes de Medeiros","doi":"10.21747/21833958/red12a3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we focus on a duel of titans, whose object of dispute is the language and whose arena are examples that concern the pronominal issue. Relying on the theoretical-method-ological support of the History of Linguistic Ideas from a discursive perspective, we also make use of categorizations proposed by Auroux (1998), Marcello-Nilzia and Petiot (1997) and Dias (2007) on exemplification to reflect on the reading promoted by a Brazilian scholar, Said Ali, in Questões de Português (1911), a critical review of the work Os problemas da Colocação de pronomes (1909), by Cândido de Figueiredo, a Portuguese scholar. We go through, in the materiality of the exempli-fication woven from works by Brazilian and Portuguese authors, some points of a dispute for the legitimacy of saying how the language is, and we analytically recover stumbles, failures, misun-derstandings and contradictions marked by reading gestures. In addition to contributing to stud-ies on exemplification, our work also contributes to the history of knowledge produced about the language, especially in/from Brazil. One of the results of this work lies in exposing, based on this quarrel, how language, knowledge and subjects of science are not outside of history and, therefore, of ideological determination.","PeriodicalId":41404,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Discapacidad-REDIS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Discapacidad-REDIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21747/21833958/red12a3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, we focus on a duel of titans, whose object of dispute is the language and whose arena are examples that concern the pronominal issue. Relying on the theoretical-method-ological support of the History of Linguistic Ideas from a discursive perspective, we also make use of categorizations proposed by Auroux (1998), Marcello-Nilzia and Petiot (1997) and Dias (2007) on exemplification to reflect on the reading promoted by a Brazilian scholar, Said Ali, in Questões de Português (1911), a critical review of the work Os problemas da Colocação de pronomes (1909), by Cândido de Figueiredo, a Portuguese scholar. We go through, in the materiality of the exempli-fication woven from works by Brazilian and Portuguese authors, some points of a dispute for the legitimacy of saying how the language is, and we analytically recover stumbles, failures, misun-derstandings and contradictions marked by reading gestures. In addition to contributing to stud-ies on exemplification, our work also contributes to the history of knowledge produced about the language, especially in/from Brazil. One of the results of this work lies in exposing, based on this quarrel, how language, knowledge and subjects of science are not outside of history and, therefore, of ideological determination.
《例子的收集者:赛义德·阿里对例子地位的反思》
在这篇文章中,我们关注的是一个巨人的决斗,他们争论的对象是语言,他们的竞技场是涉及代词问题的例子。依靠theoretical-method-ological支持语言思想的历史从散漫的角度来看,我们也利用Auroux提出的分类(1998),Marcello-Nilzia和Petiot(1997)和二叠纪(2007)范例反思阅读由巴西学者,阿里说,在Questoes葡萄牙商业银行(1911),再评论的工作操作系统安全da Colocacao de pronomes(1909),由葡萄牙坎德Figueiredo学者。我们从巴西和葡萄牙作家的作品中,通过物质性的例证,回顾了一些争论的要点,争论语言是如何存在的合法性,我们分析地恢复了错误,失败,误解和矛盾,这些都是通过阅读手势来标记的。除了对例证的研究做出贡献外,我们的工作也对语言知识的历史产生了贡献,特别是在巴西/来自巴西。这项工作的成果之一在于,在这场争论的基础上,揭示了语言、知识和科学主题是如何不在历史之外的,因此也就不在意识形态决定之外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
12
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信