Atracurium versus cisatracurium: A comparison of efficacy and safety of intubating dose in adult surgical patients

PradnyaS Joshi, Palak Bohra, Sanhita Kulkarni, VasantiM Sasturkar
{"title":"Atracurium versus cisatracurium: A comparison of efficacy and safety of intubating dose in adult surgical patients","authors":"PradnyaS Joshi, Palak Bohra, Sanhita Kulkarni, VasantiM Sasturkar","doi":"10.4103/mgmj.mgmj_225_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Our study investigated and compared the properties of atracurium and cisatracurium, nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents from the benzylisoquinolinium group. Both of these agents exhibit an intermediate duration of action. We studied the onset of neuromuscular blockade, intubating conditions, hemodynamic stability, and recovery following intubating doses. Materials and Methods: We conducted a study involving 40 patients undergoing general anesthesia, randomly assigned to two groups. Group A, consisting of 20 patients, received a dose of 0.6 mg/kg of atracurium, while Group C, also with 20 patients, received 0.15 mg/kg of cisatracurium. Throughout the surgery, we observed and recorded the time of onset of neuromuscular blockade, the intubating conditions, and the recovery following the administration of the first dose of neuromuscular blocking agents. Additionally, we continuously monitored the patient’s hemodynamic status until they recovered from the initial dose. Results: Group C exhibited a significantly faster onset of action (231.5 ± 31.2 s) than Group A (291.0 ± 14.1 s) for the administered neuromuscular blocking agents. The recovery duration following the intubating dose was notably shorter in Group A (31 ± 6.20 min) compared to Group C (50.5 ± 3.20 min). Additionally, in the cisatracurium group, all patients (100%) achieved “excellent” intubating conditions, whereas in the atracurium group, this was only the case for 60% of patients, and this difference was statistically significant. Furthermore, the atracurium group showed significantly higher heart rate and mean arterial pressure readings at different intervals than the cisatracurium group. Importantly, no adverse reactions were observed in any of the patients throughout the study. Conclusion: Compared to atracurium (0.6 mg/kg), cisatracurium at a dose of 0.15 mg/kg demonstrates superior effectiveness regarding the onset and duration of neuromuscular blockade and intubating conditions. Furthermore, cisatracurium offers a more favorable hemodynamic profile.","PeriodicalId":52587,"journal":{"name":"MGM Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MGM Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/mgmj.mgmj_225_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Our study investigated and compared the properties of atracurium and cisatracurium, nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents from the benzylisoquinolinium group. Both of these agents exhibit an intermediate duration of action. We studied the onset of neuromuscular blockade, intubating conditions, hemodynamic stability, and recovery following intubating doses. Materials and Methods: We conducted a study involving 40 patients undergoing general anesthesia, randomly assigned to two groups. Group A, consisting of 20 patients, received a dose of 0.6 mg/kg of atracurium, while Group C, also with 20 patients, received 0.15 mg/kg of cisatracurium. Throughout the surgery, we observed and recorded the time of onset of neuromuscular blockade, the intubating conditions, and the recovery following the administration of the first dose of neuromuscular blocking agents. Additionally, we continuously monitored the patient’s hemodynamic status until they recovered from the initial dose. Results: Group C exhibited a significantly faster onset of action (231.5 ± 31.2 s) than Group A (291.0 ± 14.1 s) for the administered neuromuscular blocking agents. The recovery duration following the intubating dose was notably shorter in Group A (31 ± 6.20 min) compared to Group C (50.5 ± 3.20 min). Additionally, in the cisatracurium group, all patients (100%) achieved “excellent” intubating conditions, whereas in the atracurium group, this was only the case for 60% of patients, and this difference was statistically significant. Furthermore, the atracurium group showed significantly higher heart rate and mean arterial pressure readings at different intervals than the cisatracurium group. Importantly, no adverse reactions were observed in any of the patients throughout the study. Conclusion: Compared to atracurium (0.6 mg/kg), cisatracurium at a dose of 0.15 mg/kg demonstrates superior effectiveness regarding the onset and duration of neuromuscular blockade and intubating conditions. Furthermore, cisatracurium offers a more favorable hemodynamic profile.
阿曲库铵与顺式阿曲库铵:成人手术患者插管剂量的有效性和安全性比较
背景:本研究调查并比较了苯基异喹啉类非去极化神经肌肉阻滞剂阿曲库铵和顺阿曲库铵的性质。这两种药剂的作用时间都是中等的。我们研究了神经肌肉阻滞的发作、插管条件、血流动力学稳定性和插管剂量后的恢复。材料与方法:我们对40例全麻患者进行了研究,随机分为两组。A组20例患者接受0.6 mg/kg剂量的阿曲库铵治疗,C组20例患者接受0.15 mg/kg顺阿曲库铵治疗。在整个手术过程中,我们观察并记录了神经肌肉阻滞的发生时间、插管情况以及首次给药后的恢复情况。此外,我们持续监测患者的血流动力学状态,直到他们从初始剂量恢复。结果:C组神经肌肉阻滞剂起效时间(231.5±31.2 s)明显快于a组(291.0±14.1 s)。插管后恢复时间A组(31±6.20 min)明显短于C组(50.5±3.20 min)。此外,在顺阿曲库铵组中,所有患者(100%)达到了“优秀”的插管条件,而在阿曲库铵组中,只有60%的患者达到了“优秀”的插管条件,这一差异具有统计学意义。此外,阿曲库铵组在不同时间间隔的心率和平均动脉压读数明显高于顺阿曲库铵组。重要的是,在整个研究过程中,没有观察到任何患者的不良反应。结论:与阿曲库铵(0.6 mg/kg)相比,顺阿曲库铵0.15 mg/kg剂量在神经肌肉阻断和插管条件下的起效和持续时间方面表现出优越的效果。此外,顺阿曲库铵提供了更有利的血流动力学剖面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信