Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Nature of Analgesia in the Medical-Surgical Emergency Department of CHU-Donka

Amadou Yalla Camara, Abdoulaye Touré, Almamy Bangoura, M’mah Lamine Camara, Thierno Sadou Diallo, Boubacar Atigou Dramé, Joseph Donamou
{"title":"Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Nature of Analgesia in the Medical-Surgical Emergency Department of CHU-Donka","authors":"Amadou Yalla Camara, Abdoulaye Touré, Almamy Bangoura, M’mah Lamine Camara, Thierno Sadou Diallo, Boubacar Atigou Dramé, Joseph Donamou","doi":"10.4236/ojem.2023.114015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Pain assessment is an essential step towards pain relief. In our context, however, it is insufficient in emergency departments. The aim was to assess the nature and effectiveness of the analgesia used in the emergency department of the CHU-Donka. Method: This was a single-centre prospective observational study conducted over one month (November 2020) in the medical-surgical emergency department of CHU-Donka. All patients aged 18 or over admitted to the emergency department with moderate to severe acute pain were included. Results: We enrolled 880 patients, 615 of whom (69.88%) were in pain. Males predominated (65.2%), with a sex ratio of 1.87. The average age was 44.78 ± 16.41 years, with extremes ranging from 18 to 85 years. The most represented age group was 18 - 34 years, with 66.18%. Initial assessment of pain by nursing staff in 3 cases. Initial assessment of pain by the investigator was 100%, 74% moderate and 26% severe. No reassessment of pain by nursing staff. Reassessment by the interviewer was 100% and found 5% no pain, 61% mild pain, 24% moderate pain and 10% severe pain. With an average numerical scale of 3.77 ± 2.61 and extremes from 0 to 10. Average length of stay was 2.85 ± 1.48 hours, with extremes ranging from 45 minutes to 8 hours. Analgesia was administered with paracetamol alone (43.58%), combined with tramadol or nefopam. No patient received morphine. Conclusion: This study revealed a lack of pain assessment in our department.","PeriodicalId":289242,"journal":{"name":"Open Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojem.2023.114015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pain assessment is an essential step towards pain relief. In our context, however, it is insufficient in emergency departments. The aim was to assess the nature and effectiveness of the analgesia used in the emergency department of the CHU-Donka. Method: This was a single-centre prospective observational study conducted over one month (November 2020) in the medical-surgical emergency department of CHU-Donka. All patients aged 18 or over admitted to the emergency department with moderate to severe acute pain were included. Results: We enrolled 880 patients, 615 of whom (69.88%) were in pain. Males predominated (65.2%), with a sex ratio of 1.87. The average age was 44.78 ± 16.41 years, with extremes ranging from 18 to 85 years. The most represented age group was 18 - 34 years, with 66.18%. Initial assessment of pain by nursing staff in 3 cases. Initial assessment of pain by the investigator was 100%, 74% moderate and 26% severe. No reassessment of pain by nursing staff. Reassessment by the interviewer was 100% and found 5% no pain, 61% mild pain, 24% moderate pain and 10% severe pain. With an average numerical scale of 3.77 ± 2.61 and extremes from 0 to 10. Average length of stay was 2.85 ± 1.48 hours, with extremes ranging from 45 minutes to 8 hours. Analgesia was administered with paracetamol alone (43.58%), combined with tramadol or nefopam. No patient received morphine. Conclusion: This study revealed a lack of pain assessment in our department.
中东卡内科外科急诊科镇痛效果及性质评价
疼痛评估是缓解疼痛的重要步骤。然而,在我们的情况下,这在急诊科是不够的。目的是评估在中央东卡医院急诊科使用的镇痛药的性质和有效性。方法:这是一项单中心前瞻性观察研究,于2020年11月在中央东卡医院内科外科急诊科进行了为期一个月的研究。所有年龄在18岁或以上,因中度至重度急性疼痛而入住急诊科的患者均被纳入研究。结果:纳入880例患者,其中615例(69.88%)处于疼痛状态。男性占多数(65.2%),性别比为1.87。平均年龄44.78±16.41岁,极值18 ~ 85岁。最具代表性的年龄组是18 - 34岁,占66.18%。护理人员对3例患者疼痛进行初步评估。研究者对疼痛的初步评估为100%,74%为中度,26%为重度。无护理人员重新评估疼痛。采访者的重新评估率为100%,发现5%无疼痛,61%轻度疼痛,24%中度疼痛,10%重度疼痛。平均数值尺度为3.77±2.61,极值范围为0 ~ 10。平均住院时间为2.85±1.48小时,极值为45分钟至8小时。单独使用扑热息痛镇痛(43.58%),联合曲马多或尼福泮镇痛。没有病人接受吗啡治疗。结论:本研究揭示了我科缺乏疼痛评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信